___

• An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the US. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145-172.
• Ball, D. L. (1988). The subject matter preparation of prospective mathematics teachers: challenging the myths. East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
• Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes, & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Ball, D. L., & Wilson, S. M. (1990). Knowing the subject and learning to teach it: Examining assumptions about becoming a mathematics teacher. (Research Report No. 90-7). East Lansing, MI: NCRTL, Michigan State University.
• Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?. American Educator, 29(1), 14-17.
• Barrantes, M., & Blanco, L. J. (2006). A study of prospective primary teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning school geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(5), 411-436.
• Baştürk, S. (2009). Ortaöğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarına göre fen-edebiyat fakültelerindeki alan eğitimi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(10), 137-160.
• Battista, M. T. (2003). Computer technologies and teaching geometry through problem solving. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten–grade 6 (pp. 229–238). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Baturo, A., & Nason, R. (1996). Student teachers’ subject matter knowledge within the domain of area measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(3), 235-268.
• Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: findings from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Best, j. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2005). Research in education, London: Pearson.
• Blegen, M. B., & Kennedy, C. (2000). Principals and teachers, leading together. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 1-6.
• Bragg, P., & Outhred, L. (2000). Students’ knowledge of length units: do they know more than rules about rulers?. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by Tadeo Nakarahara and Masataka Koyama (Vol. 2, pp. 97-104).
• Brahier, D. J., & Schäffner, M. (2004). The Effects of a Study‐Group Process on the Implementation of Reform in Mathematics Education. School Science and Mathematics, 104(4), 170-178.
• Burmester, M., Wu, H. 2001. Some Lessons from California. Https://Math.Berkeley.Edu/~Wu/Pspd4c.Pdf Bütün, M. (2005). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin alan eğitimi bilgilerinin nitelikleri üzerine bir çalışma. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
• Casa, T. M., Spinelli, A. M., & Gavin, M. K. (2006). This about covers it! Strategies for finding area. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(3), 168-173.
• Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1986). Geometry and geometric measurement. Arithmetic Teacher, 33(6), 29-32.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.) Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390-441). NY: Jossey-Bass.
• Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653-689.
• Goldsmith, L., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for developing teachers. In E. Fennema, & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp.19-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Grossman, P., Schoenfeld, A., & Lee, C. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 201-231).
• Hiebert, J. (1981). Cognitive development and learning linear measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 197–211.
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511.
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
• Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1, 111-155.
• Holm, J. (2014). Improving mathematics teaching through professional learning groups (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON.
• Huang, C. C. (2006). The understanding of multiplication of preservice elementary school teachers in Taiwan. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Northern Colorado,
• Huang, H. M. E. (2014). Third-to fourth-grade students’ conceptions of multiplication and area measurement. ZDM, 46(3), 449-463.
• Huang, H. M. E., & Witz, K. G. (2013). Children conception of area measurement and their strategies for solving area measurent problems. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 10-26.
• Işıksal, M. (2006). A study on pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge regarding the multiplicatıon and division of fractions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
• Kajander, A. (2010). Mathematics teacher preparation in an era of curriculum change: The development of mathematics for teaching. Canadian Journal of Education, 33(1), 228-255
• Kamii, C., & Kysh, J. (2006). The difficulty of "lenght x width": Is a square the unit of measurent?. Journnal of Mathematical Behaviour, 25, 105-115.
• Kılcan, S. (2006). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin kavramsal bilgileri: Kesirlerle bölme. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
• Kordaki, M. (2003). The effect of tools of a computer microworld on students’ strategies regarding the concept of conservation of area. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 177-209.
• Kutluk, B. (2011). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin örüntü kavramna ilişkin öğrenci güçlükleri bilgilerinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
• Leavitt, T. A. (2008). German mathematics teachers’ subject content and pedagogical content knowledge (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
• Licwinko, S. E. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ understanding of and strategies addressing problematic elementary mathematıcs topics. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Columbia University.
• Lundin, J. C. (2007). Effects of mathematics content courses on content knowledge for teaching mathematics for elementary preservice teachers. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The University of Alabama
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• McMillan, J. S., & Schumacher, J. S. (2006). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
• Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
• Mewborn, D. (2001). Teachers content knowledge, teacher education, and their effects on the preparation of elementary teachers in the United States. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 3, 28-36.
• Mewborn, D. S. (2003). Teaching, teachers’ knowledge, and their professional development. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 45–52). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13, 125-145
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. (Edited by J. Kilpartrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell). Washington: National Academy Press.
• Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
• Nitabach, E. and Lehrer, R. (1996). Developing spatial sense through area measurement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2, 473-476.
• O’Keefe, M., & Bobis, J. (2008). Primary teachers’ perceptions of their knowledge and understanding of measurement. In M. Goss, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds), Navigating currents a directions (pp. 391- 398). Brisbane, OLD: MERGA.
• Outhred, L., & McPhail, D. (2000). A framework for teaching early measurement. In J. Bana, & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond (pp. 487-494). Perth: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated.
• Outhred, L., & Mitchelmore, M. (2004). Students’ Structuring of Rectangular Arrays. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
• Padinjarekkara, J. (2007). Elementary mathematics teaching in İndia's Jharkhand: mathematical knowledge and social status. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Marquette University.
• Price, J. & Ball, D. L. (1997). There’s always another agenda: Marshalling resources for mathematics reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29, 637-666.
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. The Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
• Schifter, D., & Simon, M. A. (1992). Assessing teachers’ development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 187-197.
• Shahbari, J. A. (2017). Mathematical and Pedagogical Knowledge amongst First-and Second-Grade Inservice and Pre-service Mathematics Teachers. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning, 18(1).
• Sherin, M. G. (2000). Viewing teaching on videotape. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 36-38
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
• Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1994). Mathematical modeling as a component of understanding ratio-asmeasure: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(2), 183-197.
• Smith III, J. P., Males, L. M., & Gonulates, F. (2016). Conceptual limitations in curricular presentations of area measurement: One nation’s challenges. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(4), 239-270.
• Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Reston, VA: Information Age.
• Sowder, J., Armstrong, B., Lamon, S., Simon, M., Sowder, L., & Thompson, A. (1998). Educating teachers to teach multiplicative structures in the middle grades. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 127-155.
• Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-191). Mahwah, JN: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Stein, M. K., Baxter, J. A., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 639-663.
• Stephan, M., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Linear and area measurement in prekindergarten to grade 2. Learning and teaching measurement, 3-16.
• Strutchens, M. E., Harris, K. A., & Martin, W. G. (2001). Assessing geometric and measurement understanding using manipulatives. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(7), 402-405.
• Sullivan, P. (2004). Some ways of knowing mathematics and some implications for teacher education (editorial). Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 295–298.
• Tipps, S., Johnson, A., & Kennedy, L. M. (2011). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics. Cengage Learning.
• Türnüklü, E., & Yeşildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Preservice primary mathematics teachers’ perspectives in Turkey. Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1, 1-13.
• Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. New York, NY: Pearson.
• Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
• Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), 1-30.
• Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.