MERKEZ BANKASI BAĞIMSIZLIĞININ BÜTÇE AÇIKLARINA ETKİSİ: GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELER AÇISINDAN BİR İNCELEME

Merkez bankalarının bağımsızlığı konusu, özellikle son otuz yılda yoğun olarak tartışılır hale gelmiştir. Birincil hedefi fiyat istikrarını sağlamak olan merkez bankalarının bağımsızlığı fikri teorik açıdan zaman tutarsızlığı, kamu tercihi teorisi ve hoş olmayan monetarist aritmetik ekseninde şekillenmiştir. Hem gelişmiş hem de gelişmekte olan ülkeleri yakından ilgilendiren bu kurumsal gelişme, enflasyonla mücadele açısından para politikasının bağımsızlığını vurgulamaktadır. Bağımsız merkez bankaları hükümetleri mali disiplini sağlamaya yönlendirirken, bağımsız olmayan merkez bankaları ise hükümetlerin gevşek maliye politikası uygulamasına izin verebilmektedir. Literatüre bakıldığında, merkez bankası bağımsızlığının bütçe açıkları üzerindeki etkisini ele alan güncel çalışma sayısının yetersiz olduğu görülmektedir. Merkez bankası bağımsızlığı ile bütçe açıkları arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen makalede, 1980-2014 dönemi 66 gelişmekte olan ülke açısından panel veri analizi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Ele alınan dönem için merkez bankası bağımsızlığı göstergeleri olan merkez bankası başkanı değişim hızı (MBDH) ve yasal bağımsızlık (YB) için zaman değişimleri sıfırdır. Dolayısıyla, merkez bankası bağımsızlığı değişkeni ve kukla değişkenler birimler arası değişimleri ortadan kaldırdığından sabit etkiler modeli (fixed effect) kullanılamamaktadır. Değişkenler arasında bir ilişkinin olup olmadığını test etmek için Genelleştirilmiş En Küçük Kareler (GLS) ve Hausman-Taylor (HT) yöntemleri uygulanmıştır. Merkez bankalarının hem yasal hem de fiili bağımsızlığının ele alındığı çalışmada, merkez bankasının fiili bağımsızlığı ile bütçe açıkları arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür.

THE EFFECT OF THE CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE ON BUDGET DEFICITS: AN INVESTIGATION FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

The issue of the independence of central banks has been intensely debated, especially in the last three decades. The idea of the independence of central banks, whose primary objective is to ensure price stability, is shaped on the axis theoretically by time inconsistency, public choice theory, and unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. The institutional development, which closely concerns both developed and developing countries, emphasizes the independence of monetary policy in terms of combatting inflation. Independent central banks are driving governments to ensure fiscal discipline, while non-independent central banks can allow governments to implement loose fiscal policy. In the literature, the number of recent studies addressing the impact of central bank independence on budget deficits seems to be insufficient. Generalized Least Squares (GLS) and Hausman-Taylor (HT) methods were applied to test the relationship between variables. In this article, which examines the relationship between central bank independence and budget deficits, a panel data analysis was conducted for 66 developing countries in the period 1980-2014. For the period covered, central bank independence indicators, such as the head of the central bank turnover rate (MBDH) and legal independence (YB) are time-invariant variables. Therefore, since the central bank independence variable and dummy variables eliminate individual specific effects, the fixed effect model could not be used. Generalized Least Squares (GLS) and Hausman-Taylor (HT) methods were applied to test whether there was a relationship between the variables. In the study, which discussed both legal and actual independence of central banks, a negative relationship was found between central bank actual independence and budget deficits.

___

  • Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and Politics. NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Vol. 3, MIT Press, 13-62.
  • Alesina, A. (1989). Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies. Economic Policy. Vol. 4(8), 57-98.
  • Alesina, A. ve Summers, L. H. (1993). Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. Vol. 25(2), 151-162.
  • Bade, R. ve Parkin, M. (1988). Central Bank Laws and Monetary Policy. University of Western Ontario. 1-28.
  • Baltagi, B. H. ve Akom, S. K. (1990). On Efficient Estimation with Panel Data: An Empirical Comparison of Instrumental Variables Estimators. Journal of Applied Econometrics. Vol. 5(4), 401-406
  • Barro, R. J. ve Gordon, D. B. (1983). Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 12(1), 101-121
  • Beblavy, M. (2003). Central Bankers and Central Bank Independence. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 50(1), 61-68.
  • BIS. (2009). Accountability, Transparency and Oversight. Issues in the Governance of Central Banks. 135-150.
  • Bodea, C. ve Higashijima. (2017). Central Bank Independence and Fiscal Policy: Can the Central Bank Restrain Deficit Spending?. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 47(1), 47-70.
  • Burdekin, R. ve Laney, L. O. (1986). Fiscal Policymaking and Central Bank Institutional Constraint. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Research Paper. Nu. 8606, ABD.
  • Burdekin, C. R. ve Laney, L. O. (2016). Fiscal Policymaking and the Central Bank Institutional Constraint Una Vez Más: New Latin American Evidence. Public Choice. Vol. 167(3-4), 277-289.
  • Canzoneri, M. B., Cumby, R. E. ve Diba, B. T. (2002). Should the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve Be Concerned about Fiscal Policy. Rethinking Stabilization Policy: A Symposium Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Wyoming, 333-389
  • Chelliah R. J. (1971). Trends in Taxation in Developing Countries. IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 18(2), 254-331.
  • Combes, J. L. ve Sedik, T. S. (2006). How Does Trade Openness Influence Budget Deficits in Developing Countries? IMF Working Paper. Nu. 06/3.
  • Cukierman, A. (1992). Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence. MIT Press.
  • Cukierman A., Webb S. B. ve Neyapti B. (1992). Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review. Vol. 6(3), 353-398.
  • Cukierman, A. ve Webb, S. B. (1995). Political Influence on the Central Bank: International Evidence. The World Bank Economic Review. Vol. 9(3), 397-423.
  • Cukierman, A. (2008). Central Bank Independence and Monetary Policymaking Institutions- Past, Present and Future. European Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 24(4), 722-736.
  • Debelle, G. ve Fischer, S. (1994). “How Independent Should a Central Bank Be?”. Goals, Guidelines and Constraints Facing Monetary Policymakers. Nu. 38, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 195-221.
  • Dreher, vd. (2010). When Is A Central Bank Governor Replaced? Evidence Based on A New Data Set. Journal of Macroeconomics. Vol. 32(3), 766-781.
  • Edwards, S. ve Tabellini, G. (1990). Explaining Fiscal Policies and Inflation in Developing Countries. NBER Working Papers Series. Nu. 3493, Cambridge.
  • Eijffinger, S. ve Schaling, E. (1993). Central Bank Independence in Twelve Industrial Countries. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. Vol. 46(184), 1-41.
  • Eijffinger, S. ve De Haan, J. (1996). The Political Economy of Central Bank Independence. Special Papers in International Economics. Princeton University, No. 19, Princeton.
  • Fisher, S. (1995). Central Bank Independence Revisited. The American Economic Review. Vol. 85(2), Washington, 201-206.
  • Fuhrer, J. C. (1997). Central Bank Independence and Inflation Targeting: Monetary Policy Paradigms for the Next Millennium. New England Economic Review. Boston, 19-36.
  • Gardner, R. (1998). Unobservable Individual Effects in Unbalanced Panel Data. Economic Letters. Vol. 58(1), 39-42.
  • Garriga, A. C. (2016). "Central Bank Independence in the World: A New Data Set". International Interactions. Vol. 42(5), 849-868.
  • Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D. ve Tabellini, G. (1991). Political and Monetary Institutions and Public Financial Policies in the Industrial Countries. Economic Policy. Vol. 6(13), 341-392.
  • Hausman, J. A. ve Taylor, W. E. (1981). Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects. Econometrica. Vol. 49(6), 1377-1398.
  • Jonsson, G. (1995). Institutions and Macroeconomic Outcomes- The Empirical Evidence. Swedish Economic Policy Review. Vol. 2, 181-212.
  • Krichel, T., Levine, P. ve Pearlman, J. (1996). Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Monetary Union: Credible Inflation Targets or Monetized Debt? Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. Vol. 132(1), San Francisco, 28-54.
  • Loungani, P. ve Sheets, N. (1997). Central Bank Independence, Inflation and Growth in Transition Economies. Journal of Money. Ohio State University Press, Vol. 29(3), 381-399.
  • Lucotte, Y. (2009). The Influence of Central Bank Independence on Budget Deficits in Developing Countries: New Evidence from Panel Data Analysis. Université d’Orléans. CNRS, 2009.
  • Mas, I. (1995). Central Bank Independence: A Critical View from a Developing Country Perspective. World Development. Elsevier Science, Vol. 23(10), 1639- 1652.
  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society. Vol. 46(1), 69-85.
  • Oktar, S. (1996). Merkez Bankalarının Bağımsızlığı. İstanbul: Bilim Teknik Yayınevi. Oritani, Y. (2010). Public Governance of Central Banks: An Approach from New Institutional Economics. BIS Working Papers. Nu. 299, Basel.
  • Polillo, S. ve Guillen, M. F. (2005). Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 110(6), 1764-1802.
  • Pollard, S. P. (1993). Central Bank Independence and Economic Performance. Review. Haziran, 21-36.
  • Rogoff, K. (1985). The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target. Quaterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 100(4), 1169-1189.
  • Schwödiauer, G., Komarov, V. ve Akimova, I. (2006). Central Bank Independence, Accountability and Transparency: The Case of Ukraine. FEMM Working Paper Series. Nu. 30.
  • Sikken, B. ve De Haan, J. (1998). Budget Deficits, Monetization, and Central-Bank Independence in Developing Countries. Oxford Economic Papers. Vol. 50(3), 493-511.
  • Swinburne, M. ve Branco, M. C. (1991). Central Bank Independence: Issues and Experience 1. IMF Working Paper. Nu. 91/58, Washington.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2018). İleri Panel Veri Analizi. 3. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi. TCMB. (2012). Merkez Bankası Bağımsızlığı. Ankara.
  • Woo, J. (2003). Economic, Political and Institutional Determinants of Public Deficits. Journal of Public Economics. Nu. 87, 87-426