Doğum analjezisi: Epidural hasta kontrollü analjezi ile intravenöz hasta kontrollü analjezinin karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Çalışmamızda doğum analjezisi yöntemlerinden, hasta kontrollü epidural analjezi (HKEA) ile hasta kontrollü intravenöz remifentanil analjezisi (HKİVA), hasta memnuniyeti, vizüel analog skala (VAS), anne ve yenidoğan yan etkileri açısından karşılaştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Tek fetüse sahip, doğum analjezisi isteyen 37 gebe HKİVA (Grup 2) ve HKEA (Grup 1) gruplarına ayrıldı. Grup 1 için hazırlanan 100 mL epidural mayi içinde 1.25 mg/mL bupivakain, 2 mcg/mL fentanil bulunmaktaydı. Başlangıç dozu, 5 mL’lik bölünmüş dozlar halinde 15 mL uygulandı. Devamında 5 mL/saat bazal infüzyon, 5 mL hasta kontrollü bolus ve 20 dk kilit olarak ayarlandı. Grup 2 için hazırlanan solüsyona, 100 mL mayi içine 2 mg remifentanil konuldu. 20 mcg/h infüzyon dozu, 0.05 mcg/kg hasta kontrollü bolus ve 5 dk kilit olarak ayarlandı. Gebelerin, doğum eylemi bitene kadar VAS, maternal kalp hızı, kan basıncı, oksijen satürasyonu, bulantı, kusma, kaşıntı, sedasyon, fetal kalp hızı ve doğum eylemi sonunda yenidoğan Apgar skoru ve anne memnuniyetleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: İki grubun da yeterli düzeyde analjezi sağlayabildiği görülmüştür. Ancak VAS değerleri grup HKİVA’da daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Anne memnuniyetleri ve yenidoğan Apgar skorları benzerdi. Her iki grupta da oksijen desteği gerektiren satürasyon düşüklüğü saptanmamasına rağmen, oksijen satürasyonları Grup 2’de daha düşük seyretti. Yan etki ve hasta memnuniyetleri her iki grupta da benzer bulundu. Sonuç: Remifentanil ile intravenöz HKA’da, anne memnuniyeti yeterli görülse de, HKEA ile karşılaştırıldığında 2. saatten sonraki VAS skorları daha yüksekti. Biz HKEA’nın doğum analjezisinde altın standart olduğunu düşünmekle birlikte, epidural kateter uygulamasının kontrendike olduğu veya gebenin epidural girişimi istemediği durumlarda, HKİVA’nın epidural analjeziye iyi bir alternatif olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

Labor analgesia: Comparison of epidural patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

Objectives: In our study, patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient controlled intravenous remifentanil analgesia (PCIVA) were compared for VAS, and also their side effects on mother and newborn. Methods: In this study, 37 pregnant women with a single fetus, who had labor analgesia, were divided into groups of PCIVA (Group 2) and PCEA (Group 1). Bupivacaine 1.25 mg/ml and fentanyl 2 mcg/ml in 100 ml epidural solution were prepared for Group 1. The infusion dose was 15 ml, 5 ml divided doses. We set 5 ml/h basal infusion, 5 ml patient-controlled bolus and 20 min lock time. We prepared 2 mg remifentanil in 100 ml intravenous solution for Group 2. We set 20 mcg/h infusion, 0.05mcg/ kg patient-controlled bolus and five min lock time. VAS, maternal-fetal heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, nauseavomiting and sedation were recorded during labor. We recorded Apgar scores and maternal satisfaction at the end of labor. Results: The findings showed that both groups could provide adequate analgesia. However, VAS scores were higher in Group PCIVA. The mother satisfaction and newborn’s Apgar scores were similar. In both groups, desaturation, which is requiring oxygen support, was not determined. The oxygen saturations were lower in Group 2. The side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Although PCIVA was found to be satisfactory concerning maternal satisfaction, VAS after 2nd hour were higher compared to PCEA. PCEA is the gold standard in labor analgesia. However, we believe that PCIVA is a good alternative to epidural analgesia in cases where epidural analgesia is contraindicated or where the patient does not want an epidural.

___

  • 1. Stocki D, Matot I, Einav S, Eventov-Friedman S, Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and respiratory effects of patient-controlled intravenous remifentanil analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia in laboring wpmen. Anesth Analg 2014;118(3):589–97.
  • 2. Ohashi Y, Baghirzada L, Sumikura H, Balki M. Remifentanil for labor analgesia:a comprehensive review. J Anesth 2016;30(6):1020–30.
  • 3. Sng BL, Kwok SC, Sia AT. Modern neuroaxial labour analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015;28(3):285–9.
  • 4. Frölich MA. Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: John F. Butterworth, David C. Mackey, John D, editors. Morgan and Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. Wasnick; 2013. p. 705–11.
  • 5. Evron S, Ezri T, Protianov M, Muzikant G, Sadan O, Herman A, et al. The effects of remifentanil or acetaminophen with epidural ropivacaine on body temperature during labor. J Anesth 2008;22(2):105–11.
  • 6. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(3):CD009234.
  • 7. Weibel S, Jelting Y, Afshari A, Pace NL, Eberhart LH, Jokinen J, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteralmethods for painmanagement in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD011989.
  • 8. Irestedt L. Current status of nitrous oxide for obstetric pain relief. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38(8):771–2.
  • 9. Kranke P, Girard T, Lavand’homme P, Melber A, Jokinen J, Muellenbach RM, et al. Must we press on until a young mother dies? Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour may not be suited as a “poor man’s epidural”. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:139.
  • 10. Klomp T, van Poppel M, Jones L, Lazet J, Di Nisio M, Lagro-Janssen AL. Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(9):CD009351.
  • 11. Tuckey JP, Prout RE, Wee MY. Prescribing intramuscular opioids for labour analgesia in consultant-led maternity units: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17(1):3–8.
  • 12. Roelants F, De Franceschi E, Veyckemans F, Lavand’homme P. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient. Can J Anaesth 2001;48(2):175–8.
  • 13. Bosilkovska M, Walder B, Besson M, Daali Y, Desmeules J. Analgesics in patients with hepatic impairment: pharmacology and clinical implications. Drugs 2012;72(12):1645– 69.
  • 14. Bonner JC, McClymont W. Respiratory arrest in an obstetric patient using remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia 2012;67(5):538–40.
  • 15. Glass PS, Hardman D, Kamiyama Y, Quill TJ, Marton G, Donn KH, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short-acting opioid: remifentanil (GI87084B). Anesth Analg 1993;77(5):1031–40.
  • 16. Hill D. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia should be routinely available for use in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17(4):336–9.
  • 17. Pruefer C, Bewlay A. Respiratory arrest with remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia--another case. Anaesthesia 2012;67(9):1044–5.
  • 18. Lin R, Tao Y, Yu Y, Xu Z, Su J, Liu Z. Intravenous remifentanil versus epidural ropivacaine with sufentanil for labour analgesia: a retrospective study. PLoS One 2014;9(11):e112283.
  • 19. Ateş Y, Yücesoy CA, Unlü MA, Saygin B, Akkaş N. The mechanical properties of intact and traumatized epidural catheters. Anesth Analg 2000;90(2):393–9.
  • 20. Gülcü N. The diagnosis and treatment in epidural catheter breakages. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;33:29–32.
  • 21. Collier C. Epidural catheter breakage: a possible mechanism. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000;9(2):87–93.
  • 22. Hobaika AB. Breakage of epidural catheters: etiology, prevention, and management. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2008;58(3):227–33.
  • 23. Lee YH, Hwang HY, Sim WS, Yang M, Lee CJ. Breakage of a thoracic epidural catheter during its removal -A case report. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010;58(6):569–72.
  • 24. Asai T, Yamamoto K, Hirose T, Taguchi H, Shingu K. Breakage of epidural catheters: a comparison of an arrow reinforced catheter and other nonreinforced catheters. Anesth Analg 2001;92(1):246–8.
  • 25. Üşar P, Kar AA, Çıtak G, Maral J, Canlı Ş. Breakage of an Epidural Catheter Inserted for Labor Analgesia. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015;43(4):282–4.
  • 26. Nishio I, Sekiguchi M, Aoyama Y, Asano S, Ono A. Decreased tensile strength of an epidural catheter during its removal by grasping with a hemostat. Anesth Analg 2001;93(1):210–2, TOC.
  • 27. Tveit TO, Seiler S, Halvorsen A, Rosland JH. Labour analgesia: a randomised, controlled trial comparing intravenous remifentanil and epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012;29(3):129–36.
  • 28. Stourac P, Suchomelova H, Stodulkova M, Huser M, Krikava I, Janku P, et al. Comparison of parturient - controlled remifentanil with epidural bupivacain and sufentanil for labour analgesia: randomised controlled trial. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2014;158(2):227– 32.
  • 29. Shen MK, Wu ZF, Zhu AB, He LL, Shen XF, Yang JJ, et al. Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial of maternal and neonatal effects of patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous infusion. Anaesthesia 2013;68(3):236–44.
  • 30. Singh SK, Yahya N, Misiran K, Masdar A, Nor NM, Yee LC. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome. Braz J Anesthesiol 2016;66(3):259– 64.
  • 31. Segal S. Labor epidural analgesia and maternal fever. Anesth Analg 2010;111(6):1467–75.
  • 32. Douma MR, Middeldorp JM, Verwey RA, Dahan A, Stienstra R. A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011;20(2):118– 23.
  • 33. Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Leveno KJ. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labour. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86(5):783–9.
  • 34. Olufolabi AJ, Booth JV, Wakeling HG, Glass PS, Penning DH, Reynolds JD. A preliminary investigation of remifentanil as a labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2000;91(3):606–8.
  • 35. Vincent RD Jr, Chestnut DH. Epidural analgesia during labor. Am Fam Physician. 1998 58(8):1785–92.
  • 36. Gomar C, Fernandez C. Epidural analgesia-anaesthesia in obstetrics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17(9):542–58.
  • 37. Leighton BL, Halpern SH. Epidural analgesia:effects on labor progress and maternal andneonatal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2002;26(2):122–35.
  • 38. Lurie S, Matzkel A. Epidural anesthesia shortens duration of labor in singleton vertex presentation spontaneous delivery. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;17(3):203–5.
  • 39. Owen MD, D’Angelo R, Gerancher JC, Thompson JM, Foss ML, Babb JD, et al. 0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125 bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion. Anesth Analg 1998;86(3):527–31.
  • 40. Hill D. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia should be routinely available for use in labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2009;17:336–42.
  • 41. Ismail MT, Hassanin MZ. Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286(6):1375–81.
  • 42. Evron S, Glezerman M, Sadan O, Boaz M, Ezri T. Remifentanil: a novel systemic analgesic for labor pain. Anesth Analg 2005;100(1):233–8.
  • 43. Schnabel A, Hahn N, Broscheit J, Muellenbach RM, Rieger L, Roewer N, et al. Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012;29(4):177–85.
  • 44. Volikas I, Butwick A, Wilkinson C, Pleming A, Nicholson G. Maternal and neonatal side-effects of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth 2005;95(4):504–9.
  • 45. Volmanen P, Akural E, Raudaskoski T, Ohtonen P, Alahuhta S. Comparison of remifentanil and nitrous oxide in labour analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49(4):453–8.
  • 46. Blair JM, Hill DA, Fee JP. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. Br J Anaesth 2001;87(3):415–20.
  • 47. Blair JM, Dobson GT, Hill DA, McCracken GR, Fee JP. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine. Anaesthesia 2005;60(1):22–7.
  • 48. Volikas I, Male D. A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2001;10(2):86–90.
  • 49. Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, van der Linden PD, Stienstra R. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patientcontrolled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth 2010;104(2):209–15.
  • 50. Volmanen P, Akural EI, Raudaskoski T, Alahuhta S. Remifentanil in obstetric analgesia: a dose-finding study. Anesth Analg 2002;94(4):913–7.
  • 51. Genç Moralar D, Aygen Türkmen U, Altan A, Arısoy R, Tahaoğlu E, Ozakın E. The comparison of epidural continuous infusion and epidural patient controlled bolus administration in labor analgesia. Agri 2013;25(1):19–26.
  • 52. Wang LZ, Chang XY, Liu X, Hu XX, Tang BL. Comparison of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized clinical trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123(2):178–83.
  • 53. Liu ZQ, Chen XB, Li HB, Qiu MT, Duan T. A comparison of remifentanil parturient-controlled intravenous analgesia with epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2014;118(3):598–603.
  • 54. Balki M, Kasodekar S, Dhumne S, Bernstein P, Carvalho JC. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens. Can J Anaesth 2007;54(8):626–33.
  • 55. Kan RE, Hughes SC, Rosen MA, Kessin C, Preston PG, Lobo EP. Intravenous remifentani placental transfer, maternal and meonatal effects. Anesthesiology 1998;88(6):1467–74.
Ağrı-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0012
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Distal approach for percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of lumbar medial branches in patients with lumbar facet arthropathy: A retrospective analysis

Tülin ARICI, Ertuğrul KILIÇ

Supraskapular ve aksiller sinir bloğunun artroskopik omuz cerrahisinde postoperative ağrı, sevofluran tüketimi ve görsel netliğe etkileri

Sevtap CEMALOĞLU, Taylan AKKAYA, Derya ÖZKAN, Faruk Mehmet CATMA

Fluoroscopy-guided genicular nerves pulsed radiofrequency for chronic knee pain treatment

ŞULE ARICAN, GÜLÇİN HACIBEYOĞLU, Özlem AKKOYUN, SEMA TUNCER UZUN, Ruhiye REİSLİ

Atipik nedenli nöropatik ağrı; oral antikoagülan tedavi altında spontan epidural kanama

Melis TOSUN, Emre Sertaç BINGÜL, Volkan DEMİRDÖĞEN, YAVUZ DEMİRDÖĞEN

Internal carotid artery dissection which mimicry trigeminal neuralgia and cluster headache

Zeynep ISSI, Yüksel ERKİN, Vesile ÖZTÜRK

Doğum analjezisi: Epidural hasta kontrollü analjezi ile intravenöz hasta kontrollü analjezinin karşılaştırılması

Tayfun SÜĞÜR, Esra KIZILATEŞ, Ali KIZILATEŞ, Kerem İNANOĞLU, Bilge KARSLI

Ultrasound-guided single shot preemptive erector spinae plane block for thoracic surgery in a pediatric patient

Bahadır ÇİFTÇİ, Mürsel EKİNCİ

Ekstrakorporeal şok dalga litotripside ultrasound eşliğinde uygulanan quadratus lumborum bloğunun analjezik etkinliği

Ahmet Murat YAYIK, Şaban Oğuz DEMIRDÖĞEN, Elif ORAL AHISKALIOĞLU, Şenol ADANUR, Ali AHISKALIOĞLU, Özlem Dilara ERGÜNEY, Hacı Ahmet ALICI

Ultrasonografi rehberliğinde uygulanan kaudal epidural enjeksiyon sırasında sakral hiatusdaki anatomik farklılıklar ve başarı oranına etkisi

Erhan GÖKÇEK, Ayhan KAYDU

Pediatrik hastada preemtif erector spina plan bloğunun toraks cerrahisi sonrası analjezik etkinliği

Mürsel EKİNCİ, Bahadır ÇİFTÇİ