MRI delineation of the morphometric characteristics of type I split cord malformations: a retrospective analysis of 29 cases

Objective: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the morphometric characteristics by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of type I split cord malformation (SCM) patients.Methods: All subjects received conventional MRI with the Achieva 3.0T system (Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA), including T1WI/axial and sagittal T2WI/axial FLAIR. Transverse diameter (TD) and sagittal diameter (SD) of the split cord, TD of the convex (TDconvex) and the concave (TDconcave), cranial SD (SDcranial), and caudal SD (SDcaudal) were recorded on the sagittal image combined with the two-dimensional view. Statistical comparison was performed within and between the groups.Results: Twenty-nine type I SCM patients were included, 24 (82.8%) of whom had scoliosis. Mean TD and SD of the split cord were 0.55±0.31 cm and 7.52±4.03 cm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in TD, SD, and other parameters among the 3 groups. However, mean TD of the split cord in type I SCM patients with congenital scoliosis (0.49±0.29 cm) was significantly greater than in those without congenital scoliosis (0.18±0.44 cm) (p<0.05). TDconvex was significantly smaller than TDconcave in type I SCM patients with congenital scoliosis (p<0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between SDcranial and SDcaudal in type I SCM patients with congenital scoliosis (p>0.05); however, SDcranial was significantly smaller than SDcaudal in Group 2.Conclusion: Our study provides the first MRI characterization of the morphometric features of type I SCM, and our findings will help orthopedic surgeons in better navigating the surgical field in corrective surgery of congenital scoliosis of type I SCM patients.

___

Pang D. Split cord malformation: Part II: Clinical syn- drome. Neurosurgery 1992;31:481-500.

Zani DD, De Zani D, Morandi N, Biggi M, Belloli AG, Riccaboni P, et al. Imaging diagnosis-split cord malforma- tion. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:57-60.

Alzhrani GA, Al-Jehani HM, Melançon D. Multi-level Split Cord Malformation: Do We Need a New Classifica- tion? J Clin Imaging Sci 2014;4:32.

Liljenqvist UR. Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "vertebral column resection for com- plex congenital kyphoscoliosis and type I split cord mal- formation" (Hua Hui, Zhen-Xing Zhang, Tuan-Min Yang, Bao-Rong He, Ding-Jun Hao). Eur Spine J 2014;23:1164- 5.

Kumar R, Bansal KK, Chhabra DK. Split cord malfor- mation (scm) in paediatric patients: outcome of 19 cases. Neurol India 2001;49:128-33.

Sinha S, Agarwal D, Mahapatra AK. Split cord malfor- mations: an experience of 203 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22:3-7.

Ayvaz M, Akalan N, Yazici M, Alanay A, Acaroglu RE. Is it necessary to operate all split cord malformations before corrective surgery for patients with congenital spinal defor- mities? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2413-8.

Akay KM, Izci Y, Baysefer A, Timurkaynak E. Split cord malformation in adults. Neurosurg Rev 2004;27:99-105.

Zuccaro G. Split spinal cord malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19:104-5.

Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. Split spinal cord malfor- mation. Clin Anat 2007;20:15-8.

Peart O. Split cord malformation. Radiol Technol 2004;76:168.

Yu B, Wang YP, Qiu GX, Zhang JG, Li JY, Shen JX, et al. Corrective surgery of congenital scoliosis with type II split spinal cord malformation. Chin Med Sci J 2006;21:48- 52.

Qureshi MA, Asad A, Pasha IF, Malik AS, Arlet V. Staged corrective surgery for complex congenital scoliosis and split cord malformation. Eur Spine J 2009;18:1249-54.

Lao L, Zhong G, Li X, Liu Z. Split spinal cord malforma- tion: report of 5 cases in a single Chinese center and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg 2013;49:69-74.

Tsai TJ, Michaud LJ. Split cord malformation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92:839.

Erşahin Y. Split cord malformation types I and II: a person- al series of 131 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2013;29:1515- 26.

Jindal A, Mahapatra AK. Split cord malformations--a clin- ical study of 48 cases. Indian Pediatr 2000;37:603-7.

Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Biancheri R, Cama A. Mag- netic resonance imaging of spinal dysraphism. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:375-409.

Schijman E. Split spinal cord malformations: report of 22 cases and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19(2):96-103.

Kumar R, Singh SN, Bansal KK, Singh V. Comparative study of complex spina bifida and split cord malformation. Indian J Pediatr 2005;72:109-15.

Mahapatra AK, Gupta DK. Split cord malformations: a clinical study of 254 patients and a proposal for a new clinical-imaging classification. J Neurosurg 2005;103(6 Suppl):531-6.

Ozturk E, Sonmez G, Mutlu H, Sildiroglu HO, Velioglu M, Basekim CC, et al. Split-cord malformation and accom- panying anomalies. J Neuroradiol 2008;35:150-6.

Proctor MR, Scott RM. Long-term outcome for patients with split cord malformation. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10:5.

Shokouhi G, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM. Type I split cord mal- formation with an usual bony morphology. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2007;66:78-9.

Liu W, Zheng D, Cui S, Zhang C, Liu Y, Jia Y, et al. Char- acteristics of osseous septum of split cord malformation in patients presenting with scoliosis: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 2009;45:350-3.

Mahapatra AK. Split cord malformation - A study of 300 cases at AIIMS 1990-2006. J Pediatr Neurosci 2011;6(Suppl 1):41-5.

Borkar SA, Mahapatra AK. Split cord malformations: A two years experience at AIIMS. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:56-60.

Gupta DK, Mahapatra AK. Proposal for a new clinico- radiological classification of type I split-cord malforma- tions: a prospective study of 25 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 2006;42:341-6.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Results of a universal ultrasonographic hip screening program at a single institution

Olcay GÜLER, ALİ ŞEKER, Serhat MUTLU, Mehmet Halis ÇERÇİ, Baran KÖMÜR, Mahir MAHİROĞULLARI

Congenital bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation in unusual location and age: a case report

Sami SÖKÜCÜ, Osman Emre AYCAN, Yavuz ARIKAN, Yavuz Selim KABUKÇUOĞLU

Results of closing wedge osteotomy in the treatment of sagittal imbalance due to ankylosing spondylitis

FATİH YILDIZ, TURGUT AKGÜL, Mehmet EKİNCİ, Fatih DİKİCİ, Cüneyt ŞAR, Ünsal DOMANİÇ

A new femoral nail with single distal locking screw for maximum interfragment rotational stability

Ahmet Adnan KARAARSLAN, Hakan AYCAN, Yaman ÖRGEN, AHMET KARAKAŞLI, Fatih ERTEM, Erhan SESLİ

Turkish version of the modified Constant-Murley score and standardized test protocol: reliability and validity

Derya ÇELİK

Comminution plays no role in worsening fracture healing of conservatively treated middle third clavicular fractures

Likit RUGPOLMUANG, Thos HARNROONGROJ, Narumol SUDJAI, Thossart HARNROONGROJ

MRI delineation of the morphometric characteristics of type I split cord malformations: a retrospective analysis of 29 cases

Qing XIA, Jian Min SUN

Effectiveness of closed suction drainage tip culture in hip arthroplasty

Jai Hyung PARK, Hyun-Chul SHON, Ji Wan KİM, Se-Jin PARK, Taeg Su KO, Jong-Hyon PARK

Mobile- versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial featuring 6-10-year follow-up

Ali BAKTIR, Fatih KARAASLAN, Emre YURDAKUL, Sinan KARAOĞLU

Adult spinal deformity: a very heterogeneous population of patients with different needs

Rıfat Emre ACAROĞLU, Özgür DEDE, Ferrán PELLISÉ, Ümit O GÜLER, Montse SÀBAT DOMINGO, Ahmet ALANAY, Francisco Sanchez GRUESO PÉREZ