Murat ÜZEL, Ufuk Güney Özer ERGUN, MUSTAFA ÇELİK, Hasan EKERBİÇER, Ercan ÇETİNUS, Ahmet KARAOĞUZ

Hemşirelik ve ebelik bölümü öğrencilerinde gelişimsel kalça displazisi konusundaki bilgi ve tutumun değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Gelişimsel kalça displazisinin (GKD) önlenmesi ve erken tanısında, ailenin ve aile ile yakın ve sık ilişki içinde olan sağlık ekibinin, özellikle ebe ve hemşirelerin eğitimi önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, üniversitemiz Sağlık Yüksekokulu Ebelik ve Hemşirelik Bölümü öğrencileri arasında GKD ile ilgili bilgi ve tutumun değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Çalışma planı: Öğrencilere GKD konusunda genel bilgiler içeren bir eğitim verilmesi planlanarak, GKD ile ilgili tıbbi, uygulamaya dayalı ve geleneksel bilgi ve tutum içeren 28 ifadeden oluşan bir form hazırlandı. Bu form, gönüllü 232 öğrenciye, bir ortopedi uzmanı tarafından verilen 60 dakikalık eğitim öncesinde ve sonrasında uygulandı. Çalışmadan önce, 3. ve 4. sınıf öğrencileri GKD konusunda teorik ve uygulama dersleri almışlardı; 1. ve 2. sınıf öğrencileri ise konuyla ilgili ders görmemişti. Sonuçlar: Öğrencilerin GKD konusunda risk faktörleri ve önleme stratejileri ile ilgili bilgileri orta düzeydeydi; yanlış geleneksel uygulamalar konusunda bilinmesi gereken temel bilgi ve kavramlara sahip olmadıkları görüldü. Birinci testteki ortalama puan 51.52±13.90 iken, eğitimden sonra ikinci test puanı 87.86±5.90 idi (p=0.000). Birinci testte 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin puanı 3. ve 4. sınıflardan anlamlı farklılık gösterirken (p=0.00), ikinci test puanlarında sınıflara göre anlamlı farklılık yoktu (p>0.05). Çıkarımlar: Ebe ve hemşirelerin lisans eğitimi sırasında özellikle geleneksel tutumlar konusunda gerekli bilgiler eğitim programında yer almalıdır. Yeterli bilgi ve uygulama yeteneğine sahip hemşire ve ebeler ülkemizde GKD’nin önlenmesinde önemli rol oynayabilirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Fizik muayene, Ebelik, Süt çocuğu, yenidoğan, Eğitim, Sağlık personelinin tutumu, Kültür, Kalça çıkığı, doğumsal, Hemşireler

Knowledge and attitude of nursing and midwifery college students on developmental dysplasia of the hip

Objectives: It is of special importance to educate families and health care providers, in particular midwives and nurses who are in close and frequent contact with families, for the prevention and early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). A knowledge and attitude study was conducted concerning DDH among students of Nursing and Midwifery College of Kahramanmarafl Sütçü İmam University. Methods: A structured form was prepared consisting of 28 statements about medical and practical knowledge and traditional attitudes with regard to DDH and was administered to 232 voluntary students before and after an educational session of 60 minutes by a specialist in orthopedics. Prior to the study, the students of grade I and II had not received any theoretical or practical lectures about DDH, which were included in the curriculum of grades III and IV. Results: The knowledge of the students about risk factors and prevention strategies for DDH was of a moderate level. They were not sufficiently furnished with information about traditional attitudes and applications that predispose infants to DDH. The mean test scores before and after training were 51.52±13.90 and 87.86±5.90, respectively (p=0.000). Compared to grade III and IV students, grade I students performed significantly less in the former test (p=0.00); however, the scores of the latter test did not differ significantly between the grades (p>0.05). Conclusion: The curriculum during the license education of midwives and nurses should include essential information on traditional attitudes. With sufficient knowledge and application skills, midwives and nurses may play an important role in the primary and secondary prevention of DDH in our country.

Keywords:

Physical Examination, Midwifery, Infant, Newborn, Education, Attitude of Health Personnel, Culture, Hip Dislocation, Congenital, Nurses,

PDF

___

1. Ishida K. Prevention of the development of the typical dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;(126):167-9.
2. Tümer Y, Ömeroğlu H. Türkiye’de gelişimsel kalça displazisinin önlenmesi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1997;31: 176-81.
3. Yamamuro T. CDH or DDH? J Orthop Surg 2005;13:111-2.
4. Egemen A. Doğuştan kalça çıkığının önlenmesi. In: XIII. Milli Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongre Kitabı; 15-19 Mayıs 1993; Nevşehir, Türkiye. Internet erişimi: http:// www.totbid. org/EskiKongreler/19702000/detail.php?k=13&no=4.
5. Göksan SB, Lök V. Japonya’da uygulanan doğuştan kalça çıkığını önleme modelinin tanıtılması ve Türkiye’de uygulanabilirliği. In: Ege R, editör. XIII. Milli Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongre Kitabı; 15-19 Mayıs 1993; Nevşehir, Türkiye. Ankara: THK Basımevi; 1993. s. 328-30.
6. Bursalı A, Gülman B, Aktaş Ş. Gelişimsel kalça displazisi (GKD) ve yeni tanımlanan bir risk faktörü. In: Alpaslan MA, editör. XVII. Milli Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongre Kitabı; 24-29 Ekim 2001; Antalya, Türkiye. İstanbul: Turgut Yayıncılık; 2001. s. 285-6.
7. Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R. Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;76:94-100.
8. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. In: Herring JA, editor. Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2002. p. 513-654.
9. Erol B, Dormans JP. Hip disorders. In: Dormans JP, editor. Pediatric orthopaedics: core knowledge in orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2005. p. 224-37.
10. McCarthy JJ, Scoles PV, MacEwen GD. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Curr Orthop 2005;19: 223-30.
11. Yamamuro T, Ishida K. Recent advances in the prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;(184):34-40.
12. Barlow TG. Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital. dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1962;44:292-301.
13. Bialik V, Bialik GM, Wiener F. Prevention of overtreatment of neonatal hip dysplasia by the use of ultrasonography. J Pediatr Orthop B 1998;7:39-42.
14. Hiertonn T, James U. Congenital dislocation of the hip. Experiences of early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1968;50:542-5.
15. MacKenzie IG, Wilson JG. Problems encountered in the early diagnosis and management of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1981;63:38-42.
16. Cunningham KT, Moulton A, Beningfield SA, Maddock CR. A clicking hip in a newborn baby should never be ignored. Lancet 1984;1:668-70.
17. Godward S, Dezateux C. Surgery for congenital dislocation of the hip in the UK as a measure of outcome of screening. MRC Working Party on Congenital Dislocation of the Hip. Medical Research Council. Lancet 1998;351:1149-52.
18. Jones D. An assessment of the value of examination of the hip in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1977;59:318-22.
19. Feldman DS. How to avoid missing congenital dislocation of the hip. Lancet 1999;354:1490-1.
20. Patel H; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. CMAJ 2001;164:1669-77.
21. Garvey M, Donoghue VB, Gorman WA, O’Brien N, Murphy JF. Radiographic screening at four months of infants at risk for congenital hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992; 74:704-7.
22.Avci S, Sayli U. Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip by physical examination during the neonatal period: Follow-up with hip ultrasonography. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1999;33:110-2.
23. Demirhan M, Sar C, Aydinok HC, Cakmak M, Coban A. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip. Is newborn screening necessary?. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1994;28:8-14.
24.Omeroglu H, Koparal S, Bicimoglu A, Karademir A. The relationship between risk factors, clinical findings and ultrasonographic findings in developmental hip dysplasia. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1999;33:30-4.
25. Dezateux C, Godward S. A national survey of screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. Arch Dis Child 1996;74: 445-8.
26. Clinical practice guideline: early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2000;105(4 Pt 1):896-905.
27. Bloomfield L, Townsend J, Rogers C. A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians’, midwives’, GPs’ and mothers’ experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery 2003;19:37-45.
28. Bloomfield L, Rogers C, Townsend J, Wolke D, Quist-Therson E. The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs: an evaluation using video recordings. J Med Screen 2003;10:176-80.
29. Townsend J, Wolke D, Hayes J, Dave S, Rogers C, Bloomfield L, et al. Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of an extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and paediatric senior house officers. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-100.
30. Hayes J, Dave S, Rogers C, Quist-Therson E, Townsend J. A national survey in England of the routine examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery 2003;19:277-84.
31. Lee TW, Skelton RE, Skene C. Routine neonatal examination: effectiveness of trainee paediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:200-5.
32. Kutlu A, Memik R, Mutlu M, Kutlu R, Arslan A. Congenital dislocation of the hip and its relation to swaddling used in Turkey. J Pediatr Orthop 1992;12:598-602.
33. Sağlık Bakanlığı Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı. Internet erişimi: www.saglik.gov.tr.
34. Bayındır Ş, Tanış Z. Boş batın filmlerinde tesadüfen karşılaşılan doğuştan kalça çıkığı ve diğer kalça patolojileri. Hacettepe Tıp Cerrahi Bülteni 1970;3:220-31