Decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: What is the impact of complications on treatment outcomes?

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of treatment complications on outcomes inadult spinal deformity (ASD) using a decision analysis (DA) model.Methods: The study included 535 ASD patients (371 with non-surgical (NS) and 164 with surgical (S)treatment) from an international multicentre database of ASD patients. DA was structured in two mainsteps; 1) Baseline analysis (Assessing the probabilities of outcomes, Assessing the values of preference-utilities-, Combining information on probability and utility and assigning the quality adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for each treatment) and 2) Sensitivity analysis. Complications were analyzed as lifethreatening (LT) and nonlife threatening (NLT) and their probabilities were calculated from the databaseas well as a thorough literature review. Outcomes were analyzed as improvement, no change anddeterioration. Death/complete paralysis was considered as a separate category.Results: All 535 patients were analyzed in regard to complications. Overall, there were 78 NLT and 12 LTcomplications and 3 death/paralysis. Surgical treatment offered signiŞcantly higher chances of clinicalimprovement but also was signiŞcantly more prone to complications (31.7% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Surgical treatment of ASD is more likely to cause complications compared to NS treatment.On the other hand, surgery has been shown to provide a higher likelihood of improvement in HRQoLscores. So, the decision on the type of treatment in ASD needs to take both chances of improvement andburden associated with S or NS treatments and better be arrived by the active participation of patientsand physicians equipped with the present information.Level of evidence: Level II, Decision analysis.© 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Kaynakça

1. Acaroglu RE, Dede O. Pellise F, et al, Adult spinal deformity: very heteroge— neous population of patients with different needs. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(1):57—62.

2. Pellise F, Vila—Casademunt A, Ferrer M. et al. Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions, Eur Spine ]. 2015;24(1):3—11.

3. Everett CR. Patel RK. systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007:32(19 suppl):Sl30—S134,

4. Good CR, Auerbach JD, O'Leary PT Schuler TC. Adult spine deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4(4):159—167.

5. Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two—year quality of life in patients with adult symp— tomatic lumbar scoliosis: prospective multicenter evidence—based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2171—2178.

6. Acaroglu E. Yavuz AC. Guler UO. et al. decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: is surgery better than non—surgical treatment in improving health—related quality of life and decreasing the disease burden? Eur Spine ]. 2016 Aug:25(8):2390—2400.

Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Stobbs G, Bridwell KH. Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2007;32(20):2238—2244.

Scheer JK, Hostin R, Robinson C, et al. Operative management of adult spinal deformity results in significant increases in QALYs gained compared to non— operative management: analysis of 479 patients with minimum 2—year follow— up. Spine (Phı'lo Pa 1976). 2016 Apr 11 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27253084.

Ayhan S, Aykac B, Yuksel S, et al, Safety and efficacy of osteotomies in adult spinal deformity: what happens in the first year? Eur Spine]. 2016 Aug:25(8): 2471—2479.

Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2007;32(24):2764—2770,

Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau D, et al, Determination of minimum clini— cally important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent—segment disease, Neurosurg Spine, 2012:16(1):61—67.

Patel MS, Braybrooke ], Newey M, Sell P. comparative study of the outcomes of primary and revision lumbar discectomy surgery. Bone ]t ]. 2013;95-B(1): 90—94.

Khan KS, Bachmann LM, ter Riet G. Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta—analysis to evaluate diagnostic tests. Eur] Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;108(2):121—125,

Bekelis K, Desai A, Bakhoum SF, Missios S. predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2005—2010. Spine]. 2014;14(7):1247—1255.

McCormack RA, Hunter T, Ramos N, Michels R, Hutzler L, Bosco ]A, An analysis of causes of readmission after spine surgery. Spine (Philo Pa 1976). 2012;37(14):1260—1266.

Hellsten EK, Hanbidge MA, Manos AN, et al. An economic evaluation of peri— operative adverse events associated with spinal surgery. Spine ]. 2013:13(1): 44—53.

Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Berven S, et al. Changes in radiographic and clinical outcomes with primary treatment adult spinal deformity surgeries from two years to three— to five—years follow-up. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2010;35(20): 1849—1854.

Hassanzadeh H, ]ain A, El Dafrawy MH, et al. Clinical results and functional outcomes of primary and revision spinal deformity surgery in adults, Bone ]t Surg Am. 2013;95(15):1413—1419.

Hassanzadeh H, Jain A, El Dafrawy MH, et al. Three—column osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformity in adult patients 60 years old and older: outcome and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013:38(9):726—731.

Booth KC, Bridwell KH. Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine (Philo Po 1976). 1999:24(16):1712—1720.

Yagi M, Patel R, Boachie—Adjei O. Complications and unfavorable clinical out— comes in obese and overweight patients treated for adult lumbar or thor— acolumbar scoliosis with combined anterior/posterior surgery. Spinal Disord Tech, 2015;28(6):E368—E376,

Cho K], Suk Sl, Park SR, et al. Complications in posterior fusion and instru— mentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007;32(20):2232—2237.

Rihn ]A, Radcliff K, Hilibrand AS, et al. Does obesity affect outcomes of treat— ment for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis? Analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2012:37(23):1933—1946.

Kasliwal MK, Smith JS, Shaffrey Cl, et al. Does prior short—segment surgery for adult scoliosis impact perioperative complication rates and clinical outcome among patients undergoing scoliosis correction? Neurosurg Spine. 2012:17(2):128—133.

Schoenfeld A], Herzog ]P, Dunn ]C, Bader ]0, Belmont Jr PJ. Patient—based and surgical characteristics associated with the acute development of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(21):1892—1898.

Yadla S, Malone], Campbell PG, et al. Early complications in spine surgery and relation to preoperative diagnosis: single—center prospective study. Neurosurg Spine. 2010:13(3):360—366.

Cloyd ]M, Acosta ]r FL, Cloyd C, Ames CP. Effects of age on perioperative complications of extensive multilevel thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurg Spine. 2010:12(4):402—408.

Masuda K, Chikuda H, Yasunaga H, et al. Factors affecting the occurrence of pulmonary embolism after spinal surgery: data from the national adminis— trative database in ]apan. Spine], 2012:12(11):1029—1034.

Hartin NL, Mehbod AA, Joglekar SB, Transfeldt EE. Fusion risk score: evaluating baseline risk in thoracic and lumbar fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(25):E1616—E1623.

Schairer WW, Carrer A, Deviren V, et al. Hospital readmission after spine fusion for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2013:38(19):1681—1689. Fineberg SJ, Ahmadinia K, Patel AA, Oglesby M, Singh K. Incidence and mor— tality of cardiac events in lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2013;38(16):1422—1429.

Pull ter Gunne AF, van Laarhoven C], Cohen DB. lncidence of surgical site infection following adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of patient risk. Eur Spine ]. 2010;19(6):982—988.

Pull ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB. Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(13):1422—1428.

Guerin P, El Fegoun AB, Obeid I, et al. Incidental durotomy during spine sur— gery: incidence, management and complications. retrospective review. Injury. 2012:43(4):397—401.

Lapp MA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. [ong—term complications in adult spinal deformity patients having combined surgery comparison of primary to revision patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001;26(8):973—983.

Jo D], ]un ]K, Kim KT, Kim SM, Lumbar interbody fusion outcomes in degen— erative lumbar disease comparison of results between patients over and under 65 years of age.] Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;48(5):412—418.

Rollinghoff M, Schluter—Brust K, Groos D, et al. Mid—range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010 Mar 20;2(1):e3.

Acosta Jr FL, McClendon Jr J. O'Shaughnessy BA, et al. Morbidity and mortality after spinal deformity surgery in patients 75 years and older: complications and predictive factors.] Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(6):667—674.

Bhagat S, Vozar V, Lutchman L, Crawford R], Rai AS. Morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery: Norwich Spinal Unit experience. Eur Spine ]. 2013:22(suppl 1):S42—S46.

Fu KM, Smith JS. Polly Jr DW, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of 10,329 adults with degenerative lumbar stenosis. Neurosurg Spine, 2010:12(5):443—446.

Sansur CA, Reames DL, Smith JS, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of 10,242 adults with spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Spine. 2010:13(5):589—593,

Campbell PG, Yadla S, Nasser R, Malone J, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK. Patient comorbidity score predicting the incidence of perioperative complications: assessing the impact of comorbidities on complications in spine surgery. Neurosurg Spine. 2012:16(1):37—43.

Schoenfeld A], Carey PA, Cleveland 3rd AW, Bader ]O, Bono CM. Patient factors, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics that increase mortality and complication risk after spinal arthrodesis: prognostic study based on 5887 patients. Spine]. 2013:13(10):1171—1179,

Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar 2nd JR, Glassman SD, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults.] Bone ]t Surg Am. 2003:85—A(11):2089—2092.

Raffo CS, Lauerman WC. Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006:31(1): 99—103.

Pateder DB, Gonzales RA, Kebaish KM, et al. Pulmonary embolism after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(3):301—305,

Hamilton DK, Smith ]S, Sansur CA, et al. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2011:36(15):1218—1228.

Guyot JP, Cizik A, Bransford R, Bellabarba C, Lee M]. Risk factors for cardiac complications after spine surgery, Evid Based Spine Core]. 2010;1(2):18—25.

Schoenfeld A], Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Belmont Jr PJ. Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical quality Improvement Program. Bone ]t Surg Am. 2011;93(17):1577—1582.

Schwab FJ, Hawkinson N, Lafage V, et al. Risk factors for major peri—operative complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: multi—center review of 953 consecutive patients. Eur Spine ]. 2012:21(12):2603—2610.

Lee MJ, Hacquebord ], Varshney A, et al. Risk factors for medical complication after lumbar spine surgery: multivariate analysis of 767 patients. Spine Philo Po 1976). 2011;36(21):1801—1806.

Lee M], Konodi MA, Cizik AM, Bransford R], Bellabarba C, Chapman ]R, Risk factors for medical complication after spine surgery: multivariate analysis of 1591 patients. Spine ]. 2012;12(3):197—206.

Baker GA, Cizik AM, Bransford R], et al. Risk factors for unintended dur— otomy during spine surgery: multivariate analysis. Spine ]. 2012;12(2): 21 —126,

Pateder DB, Gonzales RA, Kebaish KM, Cohen DB, Chang ]Y, Kostuik JP. Short— term mortality and its association with independent risk factors in adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008:33(11):1224—1228.

Blamoutier A, Guigui P, Charosky S, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Groupe d'Etude de la S. Surgery of lumbar and thoracolumbar scolioses in adults over 50.

Morbidity and survival in multicenter retrospective cohort of 180 patients with mean follow—up of 4.5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012:98(5): 528—535.

Abdul—]abbar A, Takemoto S, Weber MH, et al. Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient—based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine (Phila Po 1976). 2012:37(15): 1340—1345.

Mannion AF, Fekete TF, O'Riordan D, et al. The assessment of complications after spine surgery: time for paradigm shift? Spine ]. 2013;13(6): 61 5—624.

Wu ]C, Chen YC, Liu L, et al. The risk of stroke after spinal fusion surgery: national cohort study, Spine ]. 2012;12(6):492—499.

Lonergan Tan, Place H, Taylor P. Acute complications following adult spinal deformity surgery in patients aged 70 years and older. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Oct:29(8):314—317.

E. Acaroglu et al. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumamlogica Turcica 51 (2017) 181—190 Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P. Chopin D, Study Group on S. Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine (Philu Pa 1976). 2012;37(8):693—700,

AuerbachJD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Major complications and comparison between 3—column osteotomy techniques in 105 consecutive spinal deformity procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(14):1198—1210.

Patel N, Bagan B. Vadera S. et al. Obesity and spine surgery: relation to peri— operative complications.] Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(4):291—297,

Drazin D, Shirzadi A, Rosner ]. et al, Complications and outcomes after spinal deformity surgery in the elderly: review of the existing literature and future directions. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 :31(4):E3,

DiCenso A. Cullum N. Ciliska D. lmplementing evidence—based nursing: some misconceptions. Evid Based Nurs, 1998;1(2):38—39.

Available from: http://epp.eurostat,ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index. php/Mortality_and_life_expectancy_statistics.

Kaynak Göster

  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1962
  • Yayıncı: AVES Yayıncılık

6.3b 4.4b

Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bilateral bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis shoulder with severe glenoid bone defect: A case report

Wan-Sun CHOI, Kwang-Hyun LEE, Jin-Sung PARK, Bong Gun LEE

Relationship between the mobility of medial longitudinal arch and postural control

TANSU BİRİNCİ, FEYZA ŞULE BADILLI DEMİRBAŞ

The effect of Kinesio taping on back pain in patients with Lenke Type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled trial

Yunus ATICI, Canan GONEN AYDİN, Ayşegül ATICI, Mehmet Özbey BÜYÜKKUŞÇU, Yavuz ARIKAN, Mehmet Bülent BALİOĞLU

New strategy of closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty Gun-Woo Lee, Kyung-Soon Park, Do-Youn Kim, Young-Rok Shin, Taek-Rim Yoon Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, Republic of Korea

Gun-Woo LEE, Kyung-Soon PARK, Do-Youn KİM, Young-Rok SHİN, Taek-Rim YOON

Evaluation of vitamin D levels in patients with chronic low back-leg pain

Yalkın ÇALIK, Ümit AYGÜN

A comparison of short term radiological alignment outcomes of the patient speciŞc and standard instrumentation for primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ilhan ALCELİKA, Mark BLOMŞELDA, Cenk OZTÜRKB, Ashish SONİ, Richard CHARİTYC, Alex ACORNLEYC

Influence of the different anteromedial portal on femoral tunnel orientation during anatomic ACL reconstruction

Dong-Kyu MOON, Ho-Seung JO, Dong-Yeong LEE, Dong-Geun KANG, June-Ho BYUN, Sun-Chul HWANG

Elastoplasty as a promising novel technique: Vertebral augmentation with an elastic silicone-based polymer

Alessandro GASBARRINI, Riccardo GHERMANDI, Yunus Emre AKMAN, Marco GİROLAMİ, Stefano BORIANI

Decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: What is the impact of complications on treatment outcomes?

Emre ACAROĞLU, ÜMİT ÖZGÜR GÜLER, Aysun CETİNYUREK--YAVUZ, SELCEN YÜKSEL, YASEMİN YAVUZ, Selim AYHAN, Montse DOMINGO-SABAT, Ferrán PELLISÉ, Ahmet ALANAY, Francesco S. PEREZ GRUESO, Frank KEİNSTÜCK, Ibrahim OBEID

Giant lipoma extending into two thigh canals: A case report

Melike GÜNGÖR, Emin SIR, Alper AKSOY, Şule AĞIRBAŞ