Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between the induction of early postoperative inflammatoryresponse and muscle tissue injury biomarkers after treatment of pertrochanteric fractures by dynamic hip screw (DHS) orproximal femoral nail (PFN).Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 40 patients with AO-Müller/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31.A1–31.A2 pertrochanteric fractures were enrolled and allocated one of the two groups based on the treatment type: groupDHS, (n =20,mean age = 78.4 ± 6.9 years) and group PFN (n = 20, mean age = 77.75 ± 7.0 years). Operation time was recorded inboth groups. In each patient, circulating levels of high sensitivity interleukin-6 (hs-IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and creatinekinase (CK), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured from blood samples collected 1 hour preoperatively and24 hours postoperatively.Results: The operation time was slightly shorter in group PFN than in group DHS (51.9 ± 21.1 and 38 ± 15.2 min, respectively;P = 0.02). DHS and PFN both increased hs-IL-6 (143.81 ± 89.12 and 94.13 ± 67.14, respectively), CRP (98.84 ± 31.81 and 104.4 ±31.80, respectively), and CK (400.8 ± 31.81 and 250.7 ± 31.80, respectively) 24 hours postoperatively. However, PFNcompared to DHS resulted in a lesser increase from baseline to 24 hours postoperatively only in hs IL-6 (58.91 ± 59.02 vs113.30 ± 76.24, respectively; P = 0.0016) and CK (163.6 ± 123.3 vs 310.0 ± 198.3, respectively; P < 0.0001). Moreover, there wasa positive correlation of CK levels’ surgery time in DHS (r = 0.38, P = 0.0065) and PFN (r = 0.45, P = 0.0013).Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that PFN can induce a lower early postoperative inflammatory response andmuscle tissue injury based on the assessment of hs-IL-6 and CK levels, compared to DHS in after the treatment patientspertrochanteric fractures.Level of Evidence: Level II, Therapeutic Study
___
1. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1573-1579. 10.1001/ jama.2009.1462
2. Roberts SE, Goldacre MJ. Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98: Database study. BMJ. 2003;327(7418):771-775. 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.771
3. Parker MJ, Handoll HHG. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD000093 .10.1002/14651858. CD000093.pub5
4. Oh JH, Hwang JH, Sahu D. Nailing of intertrochanteric fractures: Review on pitfalls and technical tips. JOTR. 2010;14:3-7 .10.1016/j.jotr.2010.08.006
5. Yu X, Wang H, Duan X, Liu M, Xiang Z. Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture—A metaanalysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018;52(4):299-307. 10.1016/j.aott. 2018.02.009
6. Ebrahimpour A, Okhovatpour MA, Sadighi M, Sarejloo AH, Sajjadi MRM. Comparative investigation of percutaneous plating and intramedullary nailing effects on IL-6 production in patients with tibia shaft fracture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(6):478-481. 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.006
7. Hildebrand F, Pape HC, Krettek C. Die bedeutung der zytokine in der posttraumatischen entzündungsreaktion. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:793-803. 10.1007/ s00113-005-1005-1
8. Sedlář M, Kudrnová Z, Erhart D, et al. Older age and type of surgery predict the early inflammatory response to hip trauma mediated by interleukin-6 (IL-6)). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;51(1).e1-e6. 10.1016/j.archger.2009.06.006
9. Del Prete F, Nizegorodcew T, Regazzoni P. Quantification of surgical trauma: Comparison of conventional and minimally invasive surgical techniques for pertrochanteric fracture surgery based on markers of inflammation (interleukins). J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;13(3):125-130. 10.1007/s10195-012- 0199-6
10. Lasanianos NG, Kanakaris NK, Dimitriou R, Pape HC, Giannoudis PV. Second hit phenomenon: Existing evidence of clinical implications. Injury. 2011;42:617-629. 10.1016/j.injury.2011.02.011
11. Wang Q, Lin F, Huang B, Pan LH. The effectiveness and safety of general and spinal anesthesia on systemic inflammatory response in patients with tumor-type total knee arthroplasty. Oncol Res Treat. 2020;43(9):428-434. 10. 1159/000507892
12. Eroğlu M, Kokulu S, Koca HB, Demirboğan ME, Baki ED, Özcan Ö. The effects of general and spinal anesthesia on systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2016;27(3):153- 159. 10.5606/ehc.2016.31
13. Gallucci S, Provenzano C, Mazzarelli P, Scuderi F, Bartoccioni E. Myoblasts produce IL-6 in response to inflammatory stimuli. Int Immunol. 1998;10(3):267- 273. 10.1093/intimm/10.3.267
14. Marino M, Palmieri G, Peruzzi M, Scuderi F, Bartoccioni EA. A study of inflammatory/necrosis biomarkers in the fracture of the femur treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation. Mediators Inflammation. 2015;2015:1-5. 10. 1155/2015/189864
15. Parratte S, Pesenti S, Argenson J. Obesity in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1):S91-S97.10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.003
16. Roytblat L, Rachinsky M, Fisher A. et al. Raised interleukin-6 levels in obese patients. Obes Res. 2000;8(9):673-675. 10.1038/oby.2000.86
17. Neumaier M, Metak G, Scherer MA. C-reactive protein as a parameter of surgical trauma: CRP response after different types of surgery in 349 hip fractures. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(5):788-790. 10.1080/17453670610013006
18. Garnavos C, Xirou ST, Nikolatos A, et al. Alteration of body temperature, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein after reamed intramedullary nailing: A prospective study. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(5):323-328 .10. 1097/01.bot.0000157912.84057.f1
19. Beloosesky Y, Hendel D, Weiss A, et al. Cytokines and C-reactive protein production in hip-fracture-operated elderly patients. J Gerontol, Ser A. 2007;62(4):420-426. 10.1093/gerona/62.4.420
20. Ellitsgaard N, Andersson AP, Jensen KV, Jorgensen M. Changes in C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after hip fractures. Int Orthop. 1991;15(4):311-314. 10.1007/BF00186867
21. Aalto K, Osterman K, Peltola H, Rasanen J. Changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984. ;(184):118-120.
22. Honsawek S, Deepaisarnsakul B, Tanavalee A, et al. Relationship of serum IL-6, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and knee skin temperature after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study. Int Orthop. 2011;35(1):31-35. 10.1007/s00264-010-0973-0
23. Hong JY, Suh SW, Park JH, Shin YS, Yoon JR, Yang JH. Comparison of softtissue serum markers in stable intertrochanteric fracture: Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail—A preliminary study. Injury. 2011;42(2):204-208. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.008
24. Ganapathi MK, May LT, Schultz D, et al. Role of interleukin-6 in regulating synthesis of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A in human hepatoma cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;157(1):271-277. 10.1016/S0006- 291X(88)80043-3
25. Laurence AS. Serum myoglobin and creatine kinase following surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(6):763-766. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013590
26. Arts MP, Nieborg A, Brand R, Peul WC. Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(3):282-286. 10.3171/SPI-07/09/282
27. Sharma A, Sethi A, Sharma S. Treatment of stable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur with proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw: A comparative study. Rev Bras Ortop. 2018;53(4):477-481. 10.1016/j.rbo.2017.07.002
28. Wagman Y, Segal O, Dudkiewicz I, Steinberg E. Markers of muscle damage for comparing soft tissue injury following proximal femur nail and dynamic hip screw operations for intertrochanteric hip fractures. Injury. 2016;47(12):2764- 2768. 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.018
29. Tonotsuka H, Sugiyama H, Tanaka D, Ito T, Amagami A, Marumo K. Postoperative creatine kinase elevation following hip arthroscopy and associated risk factors. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019;53(6):397-401. 10.1016/j.aott. 2019.08.011