Comparison of effectiveness of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebra fractures

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebra fractures.Methods: TheŞles of the patients who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporoticvertebrae fractures were retrieved from the archives. Forty-three patients with complete follow-up datawere included in the study group. The patients were evaluated for radiological outcomes in terms of localkyphosis angle, wedging index, compression ratio, visual analog pain scale (VAS) and Oswestry DisabilityIndex (ODI).Results: In the study group, kyphoplasty was performed on 24 vertebrae of 22 patients (17 females, 5males; mean age: 73 years) whereas vertebroplasty was applied on 24 vertebrae of 21 (16 females, 5males; mean age: 74.7 years) patients. The mean follow-up time was 26 months. When the VAS and ODIvalues of the groups were analyzed, both groups showed statistically signiŞcant progress after theoperation. Radiological data showed that the kyphoplasty group showed statistically signiŞcantimprovement in the sagittal index values whereas the vertebroplasty group did not. The overallcomplication ratio was 4%.Conclusion: Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are effective treatment methods for functional recovery and pain relief in osteoporotic fractures of the vertebra. Although radiological outcomes of thekyphoplasty seem to be better, this does not have any clinical relevance. We suggest vertebroplasty overkyphoplasty since it is an easier method to manage.Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

___

1. Steindler A. The classic: osteoporosis. 1956. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443: 3e9. discussion 2.

2. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(Suppl. 2):S3eS7.

3. Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkk€ anen L, et al. Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18: 1254e1260.

4. Lavelle W, Carl A, Lavelle ED, Khaleel MA. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:299e314.

5. Altun NS¸ . Torakolomber vertebra kırıklarının tedavi oncesi ve sonras € ı degerlendirilmesi. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg. 1993;4:30e34.

6. Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:1083e1087.

7. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2940e2952. discussion 2952.

8. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:581e585. discussion 585.

9. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1537e1541.

10. Deramond H, Depriester C, Toussaint P, Galibert P. Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 1997;1:285e296.

11. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P. Longterm observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:1410e1414.

12. Kaufmann TJ, Jensen ME, Schweickert PA, Marx WF, Kallmes DF. Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1860e1863.

13. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1511e1515.

14. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1631e1638.

15. Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P. Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2747e2755.

16. Boszczyk BM, Bierschneider M, Schmid K, Grillhosl A, Robert B, Jaksche H. € Microsurgical interlaminary vertebro- and kyphoplasty for severe osteoporotic fractures. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:32e37.

17. Majd ME, Farley S, Holt RT. Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine J. 2005;5:244e255.

18. Shedid D, Togawa D, Lieberman IH. Kyphoplasty: vertebral augmentation for compression fractures. Clin Geriatr Med. 2006;22:535e544.

19. Harrop JS, Prpa B, Reinhardt MK, Lieberman I. Primary and secondary osteoporosis' incidence of subsequent vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:2120e2125.

20. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285:320e323.

21. Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV, Pfiefer BA, Pazianos AG, Choi IS. Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology. 2003;226:119e124.

22. Lee BJ, Lee SR, Yoo TY. Paraplegia as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. Spine. 2002;27: 419e422.

23. Lin EP, Ekholm S, Hiwatashi A, Westesson PL. Vertebroplasty: cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:175e180.

24. Padovani B, Kasriel O, Brunner P, Peretti-Viton P. Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:375e377.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Investigation of candidate genes for osteoarthritis based on gene expression profiles

Shuanghai DONG, Tian XİA, Lei WANG, Qinghua ZHAO, Jiwei TİAN

Kinesio taping as a treatment method in the acute phase of ACL reconstruction: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

SELVİN BALKİ, HANIM EDA GÖKTAŞ, Zekeriya ÖZTEMUR

Revision surgeries following artiŞcial disc replacement of cervical spine

Jong-Beom PARK, Han CHANG, Jin S. YEOM, Kyung-Soo SUK, Dong-Ho LEE, Jae Chul LEE

Weakening iliopsoas muscle in healthy adults may induce stiff knee pattern

N. Ekin AKALAN, Shavkat KUCHIMOV, Adnan APTİ, Yener TEMELLİ, Anand NENE

Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classiŞcations used for adult femoral neck fracture?

Ali TURGUT, Mert KUMBARACI, Önder KALENDERER, Gokhan ILYAS, Tayfun BACAKSIZ, Levent KARAPINARZ

Anamnestic prediction of bucket handle compared to other tear patterns of the medial meniscus in stable knees

Barak HAVİV, Shlomo BRONAK, Yona KOSASHVİLİ, Rafael THEİN

Flexor tendon complications in comminuted distal radius fractures treated with anatomic volar rim locking plates

ADNAN KARA, Haluk ÇELİK, Yunus ÖÇ, Metin UZUN, Mehmet ERDİL, Cihangir TETİK

Primary total knee arthroplasty for elderly complex tibial plateau fractures

Jie-Feng HUANG, Jian-Jian SHEN, Jun-Jie CHEN, Pei-Jian TONG

Posterior ankle impingement syndrome in football players: Case series of 26 elite athletes

Savaş KUDAŞ, GÜRHAN DÖNMEZ, Çetin IŞIK, MEHMET MESUT ÇELEBİ, NURDAN ÇAY, Murat BOZKURT

Bone resorption, matrix metalloproteinases and caffeic acid phenethyl ester

Sümeyya AKYOL, S. Fatih KURŞUNLU, Ömer AKYOL