Wenhan HUANG, Yu ZHANG, Zilong YAO, Linmin MA

Clinical examination of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 3 tests for assessing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures.Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) searches were performed. Studies selected for data extraction were those that addressed the accuracy of at least 1 physical diagnostic test for ACL rupture in comparison with a clinical reference standard such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The references of the included studies were also reviewed. Searches were limited to English and Chinese languages.Results: Sixteen studies that assessed the accuracy of the 3 tests for diagnosing ACL ruptures met the inclusion criteria. Study results were, however, heterogeneous. The Lachman test is the most sensitive test to determine ACL tears, showing a pooled sensitivity of 87.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.90). The pivot shift test is the most specific test, showing a pooled specificity of 97.5% (95% CI 0.95-0.99); additionally, it has the highest positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of 16.00 (95% CI 7.34-34.87). The Lachman test has the lowest negative likelihood ratios (LR-) of 0.17 (95% CI 0.11-0.25).Conclusion: In cases of suspected ACL injury, it is recommended to perform the pivot shift test, as it is highly specific and has greater likelihood and discrimination of accurately diagnosing ACL rupture. The Lachman test has great efficacy in ruling out a diagnosis of ACL rupture because of the lowest negative likelihood ratios.

___

Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Bahr R, Beynnon BD, Demaio M, et al. Understanding and preventing non- contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1512-32.

Steinbrück K, Wiehmann JC. Examination of the knee joint. The value of clinical findings in arthroscopic con- trol. [Article in German] Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1988;126:289-95. [Abstract]

Tonino AJ, Huy J, Schaafsma J. The diagnostic accuracy of knee testing in the acutely injured knee. Initial examination versus examination under anaesthesia with arthroscopy. Acta Orthop Belg 1986;52:479-87.

Scholten RJ, Opstelten W, van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Dev- ille WL, Bouter LM. Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 2003;52:689-94.

Richter J, Dàvid A, Pape HG, Ostermann PA, Muhr G. Diagnosis of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate liga- ment. Value of ultrasonic in addition to clinical examina- tion. [Article in German] Unfallchirurg 1996;99:124-9. [Abstract]

Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP. Clinical di- agnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta- analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006;36:267-88.

Dodd M, Trompeter A, Harrison T, Palmer S. The piv- ot shift test is of limited clinical relevance in the arthritic anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Knee Surg 2010;23:131-5.

Rayan F, Bhonsle S, Shukla DD. Clinical, MRI, and ar- throscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Int Orthop 2009;33:129-32.

Spahn G, Wittig R, Kahl E, Klinger HM, Mückley T, Hofmann GO. Evaluation of cartilage defects in the knee: validity of clinical, magnetic-resonance-imaging and ra- diological findings compared with arthroscopy. [Article in German] Unfallchirurg 2007;110:414-24. [Abstract]

Thomas S, Pullagura M, Robinson E, Cohen A, Banasz- kiewicz P. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in our current management of ACL and meniscal injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:533-6.

Esmaili Jah AA, Keyhani S, Zarei R, Moghaddam AK. Accuracy of MRI in comparison with clinical and ar- throscopic findings in ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee. Acta Orthop Belg 2005;71:189-96.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann In- tern Med 2011;155:529-36.

Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, et al. Conducting systematic re- views of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002;2:9.

Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 1976;4:84-93.

Mitsou A, Vallianatos P. Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign. Injury 1988;19(6):427-8.

Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. The pivot shift phenomenon: results and description of a modified clini- cal test for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 1988;16:571-6.

Tanaka M, Vyas D, Moloney G, Bedi A, Pearle AD, Musahl V. What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:737-42.

Steinbrück K, Wiehmann JC. Examination of the knee joint. The value of clinical findings in arthroscopic con- trol. [Article in German] Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1988;126:289-95. [Abstract]

Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240:1285-93.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 1994;308:1552.