Evaluation of cancer related missense mutations in CENPH

Objective: CENPH, centromere protein H, is one of the constitutive kinetochore proteins. High expression of CENPH has been shown in various forms of cancers; however, studies searching the effect of CENPH mutations in cancers are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the potential effects of the missense mutations of CENPH that have been identified in different cancers. Materials and Methods: Missense CENPH mutations, which have been observed in cancers, were downloaded from the COSMIC v89. The effect of missense mutations was predicted by using PredictSNP1.0. The protein structure of the CENPH protein was generated with I-TASSER and missense mutations were visualized on CENPH protein with UCSF Chimera. Structural effects of selected mutations were assessed with HOPE. Results: 34 missense mutations were observed in human cancers. Of the 34 missense mutations 18 mutations were predicted as deleterious and 16 mutations were predicted as neutral with ranging expected accuracies. Predicted missense mutations showed a scattered pattern on 3D CENPH protein. Two of the predicted deleterious missense mutations with higher expected accuracy were further analyzed and assessed according to amino acid properties. Conclusion: This study provided a systematic analysis and evaluation of missense mutations on a CENPH protein that have been observed in different cancers.

___

[1] Sugata N, Li S, Earnshaw WC, Yen TJ, Yoda K, Masumoto H, et al. Human CENP-H multimers colocalize with CENP-A and CENP-C at active centromere--kinetochore complexes. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:2919-26.

[2] Amaro AC, Samora CP, Holtackers R, Wang E, Kingston IJ, Alonso M, et al. Molecular control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and chromosome oscillations. Nat Cell Biol 2010;12:319-29.

[3] Orthaus S, Ohndorf S, Diekmann S. RNAi knockdown of human kinetochore protein CENP-H. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;348:36-46.

[4] Liao WT, Feng Y, Li ML, Liu GL, Li MZ, Zeng MS, et al. Overexpression of centromere protein H is significantly associated with breast cancer progression and overall patient survival. Chin J Cancer 2011;30:627-37.

[5] Guo XZ, Zhang G, Wang JY, Liu WL, Wang F, Dong JQ, et al. Prognostic relevance of Centromere protein H expression in esophageal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2008;8:233.

[6] Lu G, Shan T, He S, Ren M, Zhu M, Hu Y, et al. Overexpression of CENP-H as a novel prognostic biomarker for human hepatocellular carcinoma progression and patient survival. Oncol Rep 2013;30:2238-44.

[7] Wu X, Lin Y, Shi L, Huang Y, Lai C, Wang Y, et al. Upregulation of centromere protein H is associated with progression of renal cell carcinoma. J Mol Histol 2015;46:377-85.

[8] Liao WT, Song LB, Zhang HZ, Zhang X, Zhang L, Liu WL, et al. Centromere protein H is a novel prognostic marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression and overall patient survival. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:508-14.

[9] Liao WT, Wang X, Xu LH, Kong QL, Yu CP, Li MZ, et al. Centromere protein H is a novel prognostic marker for human nonsmall cell lung cancer progression and overall patient survival. Cancer 2009;115:1507-17.

[10] Lu G, Hou H, Lu X, Ke X, Wang X, Zhang D, et al. CENP-H regulates the cell growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Oncol Rep 2017;37:3484-92.

[11] Tate JG, Bamford S, Jubb HC, Sondka Z, Beare DM, Bindal N, et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:D941-D7.

[12] Bendl J, Stourac J, Salanda O, Pavelka A, Wieben ED, Zendulka J, et al. PredictSNP: robust and accurate consensus classifier for prediction of disease-related mutations. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003440.

[13] O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D733-45.

[14] Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 2010;5:725-38.

[15] Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods 2015;12:7-8.

[16] Yang J, Zhang Y. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:W174-81.

[17] Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-12.

[18] Dunbrack RL, Jr. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:431-40.

[19] Venselaar H, Te Beek TA, Kuipers RK, Hekkelman ML, Vriend G. Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:548.

[20] Perpelescu M, Fukagawa T. The ABCs of CENPs. Chromosoma 2011;120:425-46.

[21] Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:478-87.

[22] Cai W, Zhou D, Wu W, Tan WL, Wang J, Zhou C, et al. MHC class II restricted neoantigen peptides predicted by clonal mutation analysis in lung adenocarcinoma patients: implications on prognostic immunological biomarker and vaccine design. BMC Genomics 2018;19:582.

[23] Gupta CL, Akhtar S, Bajpai P. In silico protein modeling: possibilities and limitations. EXCLI J 2014;13:513-5
Acta Medica-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-9488
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Pretibial Edema Strain Ratio Obtained by Elastography Can Be Used in Differential Diagnosis of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Nephrotic Syndrome

DERYA DEMİRTAŞ, Burçak ÇAKIR PEKÖZ, Mehmet KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU

Evaluation of cancer related missense mutations in CENPH

CEREN SUCULARLI

Pathways and Inborn Errors of Bile Acid Synthesis

UFUK BOZKURT OBUZ, İNCİLAY LAY

Mid-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Total Occlusions: Single Center Experience

AHMET HAKAN ATEŞ, AYSU BAŞAK ÖZBALCI, Selim KUL, Mustafa YENERÇAĞ, Metin OKŞUL, UĞUR ARSLAN

Biliary Atresia Splenic Malformation Syndrome: A Single Center Experience

Önder ÖZDEN, Şeref Selçuk KILIÇ, Murat ALKAN, Gökhan TÜMGÖR, Recep TUNCER

Pain Management of Multiple Rib Fractures based on Early Reduction and Fixation in Patients without Intensive Care Unit

İsmail AĞABABAOĞLU, ÖZGÜR ÖMER YILDIZ, Filiz Banu ÇETİNKAYA ETHEMOGLU, Yavuz Selim SANİOĞLU

Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Atypical Presentation

İnci YAMAN BAJİN, Yılmaz YILDIZ, Şenol AKIN, Selin AYTAÇ, Şule ÜNAL, Barış KUŞKONMAZ, Mualla ÇETİN, Serap SİVRİ, FATMA GÜMRÜK

The Difference in Clinical and Prognostic Features Between De Novo and Recurrent Her2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Yusuf ACIKGOZ, Yakup ERGÜN, Gökhan UÇAR, Merve DİRİKOÇ, Doğan UNCU

Better Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy than Conventional Thyroidectomy

Nilda SÜTAY SÜSLÜ, Çağrı KÜLEKÇİ, Selçuk DAĞDELEN, Nafiye YILDIZ, AYŞE TOMRİS ERBAŞ