Urban transformation through property-led regeneration: A case of building renewals in Istanbul

Urban transformation is a prominent topic within Istanbul’s urban planning agenda. Transformation process of the city falls under the scope of academicians and the related authorities; and is a focus of debate from different perspectives in daily life. In this atmosphere, centralised policies promote construction facil- ities as the leading economic sector, and the legislation sets the legal framework facilitating transformation processes. This transformation in Istanbul occurs in two forms; as area-based regeneration projects and single building renewal pro- cesses. Area-based regeneration projects have long been examined due to their widespread effects, however single building renewal also leads to transformation over the long term. The motivation behind this paper is to examine the single building renewal process by means of a case study – Bakirkoy, which is one of the sub-centres of Istanbul. In this context, the paper aims to construct an analytical evaluation of the regeneration process in Bakirkoy and tries to evaluate the pro- cess linking it with critiques of property-led regeneration debates worldwide. This paper covers a periodical evaluation of this process by attempting to understand the urban transformation pattern by means of a descriptive spatial analysis, and a discussion of recent policies in Bakirkoy case.

___

Adair, A., Berry, J., McGreal, S., Ded- dis, B. & Hirst, S. (1999). Evaluation of Investor Behaviour in Urban Regeneration, Urban Studies, 36(12), 2031 – 2045. doi.org/10.1080/0042098992520

Alkay, E., Watkins, C., & Keskin, B., (2018). Explaining spatial variation in housing construction activity in Tur-key. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(2), 119- 130.

Angell, E. (2014). Assembling disaster: Earthquakes and urban politics in Istanbul. City, 18(6), 667-678.

Balaban, O., (2012). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unraveling the role of the public sector, Habitat International, 36(1), 26-35.

Coskun, Y., Seven, U., Ertugrul, H.M., & Alp, A. (2017). Housing price dynamics and bubble risk: the case of Turkey. Housing Studies (2017: published online) 1-37. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2017.1363378

Dincer I. (2011). The Impact of Neoliberal Policies on Historic Urban Space: Areas of Urban Renewal in Is- tanbul, International Planning Studies, 16(1), 43-60.

Elicin, Y. (2014). Neoliberal trans- formation of the Turkish city through the Urban Transformation Act. Habitat International, 41, 150-155.

Encyclopedia of Istanbul (Istanbul Ansiklopedisi). (1993) Bakirkoy Ilcesi (Bakirkoy District)

Imrie, R. & Thomas, H. (1993). The limits of property-led regeneration, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 11, 87-102.

Kayasü, S. & Yetişkul, E. (2014). Evolving Legal And Institutional Frameworks Of Neoliberal Urban Policies In Turkey, METU JFA, 31(2), 209 – 222. DOI: 10.4305/METU. JFA.2014.2.11

Kısar Koramaz, E. & Turkoglu, H., (2014). Istanbul’da Kentsel Yeşil Alan Kullanımı ve Kentsel Yeşil Alanlardan Memnuniyet [Urban Green Area Use and Green Area Satisfaction in Istan- bul], Planlama, 24(1), 26-34.

Kısar Koramaz, E., (2014). The Spatial Context of Social Integration, Journal of Social Indicators Research, 119(1). 49-71.

Kısar Koramaz E. & Koramaz T. K., (2017). İstanbul’da Kültür Tesislerinin Yer Seçimi, in Turk, S., S. & Dokmeci V. (Ed.), Yer seçimi Kuramı ve Uygulamaları: Konut, Alışveriş Merkezleri, Ofis- ler, Oteller, Sanayi, Depolar, Üniversiteler, Yurtlar, Hastaneler, Kültür Tesisleri, Yeşil Alanlar, Yeni Anadolu Yayıncılık, ISBN: 978-605-66154-5-0

Koramaz, T. K. (2018). Housing Renewal Sites and Spatial Features of Deterioration and Deprivation in Istanbul’s Historic Peninsula. Jour- nal of Urban Planning and Develop- ment, 144(1). doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) UP.1943-5444.0000429

Kuyucu, T., & Unsal, O. (2010). Urban transformation’ as state-led property transfer: An analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1479-1499.

Loftman, P., & Nevin, B. (1995). Prestige Projects and Urban Regeneration in the 1980s and 1990s: a Review of Benefits and Limitations, Planning Practice and Research, 10( 3⁄4), 99-315.

Lovering, J., & Turkmen, H. (2011). Bulldozer neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The state-led construction of property markets and the displacement of the urban poor, International Planning Studies, 16(1), 73-96.

Oatley, N. (1995) Editorial, Ur- ban Regeneration, Planning Practice & Research, 10(3-4), 261-270. DOI: 10.1080/02697459509696277

Oktem Unsal, B., (2015). State-led Urban Regeneration in Istanbul: Power Struggles between Interest Groups and Poor Communities, Housing Studies, 30:8, 1299-1316.

Ongoren, G. (2017). Kentsel Donu- sum Hukuku, Ongoren Hukuk Yayın- ları, Istanbul, http://www.kent-seldo- nusumvehukuk.com/wp-con-tent/ uploads/2017/06/Kentsel-donu¬- sum-hukuku-14-haziran-2017.pdf (14.06.2017)

Özkan Eren M. & Özçevik, Ö. (2015). Institutionalization of Disaster Risk Discourse in Reproducing Urban Space in Istanbul, ITU A|Z, 12(1), 221- 241.

Sezer, Y. (2017). Riskli Alan Ilani ve Hukuki Sonuçlari, Turkiye Barolar Birligi Dergisi, 130 (Mayıs-Haziran), 225-252.

Turok, I. (1992). Property-led urban regeneration: panacea or placebo? En- vironment & Planning A. 24(3), 361- 379.

Url-1; Interview with Mayor of Ba- kirkoy: http://www.haberturk.com/ yasam/haber/1046862-Bakirkoy-bele- diye-baskani-aciklai-Bakirkoyun- yuzde-78i-curuk (25.02.2015)

Url-2; Bakirkoy’de Kentsel Donu- sume Itiraz Var [Rejection for Trans- formation of Bakirkoy]: http://www. radikal.com.tr/turkiye/Bakirkoy- deki_kentsel_donusume_itiraz_gel- di-1306066 (04.03.2015)

Url-3; Panel on Urban Regeneration in Bakırkoy; http://www.mimarist.tv/ bakirkoyde-kentsel-donusum-gercegi

Url-4 Bakirkoy’de Kentsel Donusume Izin Cikmadi [No License of Transformation in Bakirkoy] http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gun- dem/28773585.asp: (19.04.2015)