Paradigm shift in studio culture

This study originates from a second year architectural design studio experience which was conducted at İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture in 2012 and it discusses a paradigm shift in architectural design education in the context of studio culture. The main motivation distinguishing the studio was to start an open studio culture in a cultivation atmosphere, and elaborate architectural design education in a multifaceted manner while questioning the teaching-learning duality. ‘Parallax-Room 3407’ inherited its name from the book ‘Parallax’ by Holl, which triggered the conceptual discussions it is founded on, and the studio 3407 of Taşkışla. The studio during the period of fall semester, followed different synchronous trajectories which are covered in the following subtopics in this paper: Bodily Experience, Critical Thinking, Learning By Doing, Narratives On Urban Context, Parallax: Thinking With Concepts, and Thinking By Representing. This learning environment referred to a constructivist educational approach, and was founded on the acknowledgement that design knowledge can only be achieved through discovery, not by a passive transmission from the teacher to the student. The contextual character of architectural design knowledge necessitates a paradigm shift; the activation of an open studio culture and burgeoning approaches of learning to learn, learning by discovering/ experiencing/ doing instead of pursuing conventional practices.


Brooks, J. G., (1999). “Constructivism As A Paradigm For Teaching And Learning”, workshop notes from WNET Education, retrieved from: concept2class/constructivism/index. html

Brooks, J.G.; Brooks M.G., (1999). In search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classroom, Virginia / USA: ASCD Publications (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).

Aydınlı, S.; Avcı, O. (2010). Relation- al Thinking that Enhance the Critical Thinking: A Design Studio Case Based On The Discovery Of Knowledge, in Educating Architects Towards Innovative Architecture, eds: C. Spiridonis, M. Voyatzaki, EAAE Transactions on Architectural Education, ENHSA Publication, 89-101.

Aydınlı, S.; Kürtüncü, B. (2014). Paralaks Oda 3407: Öğrenmeyi Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak Stüdyo, İstanbul: Cenkler Matbaası.

Thomas, D.: Brown, J.S. (2013). Learning In The Collective, Retrieved from: http://www.hybridpedagogy. com/journal/learning-in-the-collective/

Dewey, J., (1963). Experience and Education, New York: Collier Books.

Goldschmidt, G., (1994). On Visual thinking: The Vis Kids of Architecture, Design Studies, 18(4), 441-455.

Holl, S., (2000). Parallax, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Kurokawa, K., (1998). Kisho Kurokawa From the Machine Age to the Age of Life, Book Art Ltd.

Reese, H. W., (2011). Reese, H. W. (2011). The learning-by-- Doing Principle, Behavioral Development Bulletin, 17(1), 1-19.

Schön, D., A., (1992). Designing as Reflective Conversation with Materials of a Design Situation, Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131 - 147.

Kuhn, T., (1969). Comment on the Relations of Science and Art, Comparative Studies in Philosophy and History, 11., 403- 412.

Clyburn, G., (2011). Learning by Doing: Building a Networked Improve- ment Community, Retrieved from: https://www.carnegiefoundation. org/blog/learning-by-doing-building-a-networked-improvement-community/

Von Oech, R., (1998). A Whack on the Side Of The Head, New York: Warner Books.

Aydınlı, S.; Akpinar, İ, (2003). Heraclitus and the Design Studio, ITU Journal, A Architecture, Planning, Design, pp. 58-72.

Tschumi, B. (1981). Manhattan Transcripts, Academy Editions.

Todd, R. (1999). Design and Technology Yields a New Paradigm for Elementary Schooling, Retrieved from: JOTS/Summer-Fall-1999/Todd.html

Kaynak Göster