Farkli cila sistemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri üzerine etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, dört farklı kompozit cila sisteminin farklı türdeki üç kompozit rezinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada bir anterior (GradiaSO), bir posterior (Filtek P60) ve bir akıcı kompozit (Clearfil Majesty Flow) kullanılmıştır. Her kompozit grubunda 40 örnek olacak şekilde, 5 mm çapında 2 mm kalınlığında toplam 120 örnek teflon kalıplar kullanılarak hazırlandı. Her bir cila sistemi için tüm örnekler 4’er alt gruplara ayrıldı (n=10). Her kompozit grubu için SofLex Disk ve SofLex Spiral, Dimanto ve IdentoFlex Composite Polishers cila sistemleri kullanıldı. Hazırlanan kompozit örnekleri Sof-Lex Disk’in en kalın grenli zımparası ile pürüzlü hale getirildi. Ardından profilometre cihazı ile pürüzlülük değerleri (Ra) kaydedildi. Örnekler 24 saat boyunca oda sıcaklığında distile su içerisinde bekletildikten sonra cila işlemi yapıldı ve yüzey pürüzlülüğü tekrar ölçüldü. Çok yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey HSD çoklu testleri ile istatistiksel analiz yapıldı (p

Effect of different polishing system on surface roughness of composite resins

Aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of four different composite polishing systems on the surface roughness of three different composite resins. MAterials and Method: An anterior (GradiaSO), a posterior (Filtek P60) and a flowable composite (Clearfil Majesty Flow) were used in this study. A total of 120 specimens with a diameter of 5 mm and a thickness of 2 mm were prepared using teflon molds, with 40 samples in each composite batch. For each polishing system, all samples were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 10). SofLex Disk, SofLex Spiral, Dimanto and IdentoFlex Composite Polishers were used. The prepared composite samples were roughened with the thickest grained abrasive of the Sof-Lex disc. The roughness values (Ra) of each sample were then recorded using a surface roughness device. After the samples were incubated in distilled water at room temperature for 24 hours, polishing procedure were carried out and surface roughness were measured aga in. Multiple analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD multiple tests were used for statistical analysis (p

___

  • 1. Aytac F et al. Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 247-261.
  • 2. Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 549-560.
  • 3. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 198-205.
  • 4. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382-1390.
  • 5. Beun S et al. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 51-59.
  • 6. Bayne SC et al. A characterization of first-generation f lowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 567577.
  • 7. Yu B, Lee YK. Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. J Dent 2008; 36: 840-846.
  • 8. Hosoya Y et al. Effects of polishing on surface roughness and gloss of S-PRG filled flowable resin composite. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 227-230.
  • 9. Lu H, Roeder LB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 297-303.
  • 10. Da Costa J et al. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 214-224.
  • 11. Musanje L, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on in vitro wear of experimental hybrid resin composite. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 77: 120-125.
  • 12. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 641-648.
  • 13. Borges AB, Marsilio AL, Pagani C, Rodrigues JR. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004; 16: 42-47.
  • 14. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19: 121-134.
  • 15. Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004; 16: 211-7; quiz 218.
  • 16. Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 243-247.
  • 17. Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Nunes OB. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins. Braz Dent J 2005; 16: 39-44.
  • 18. da Costa JB, Goncalves F, Ferracane JL. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 205-212.
  • 19. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 12-18.
  • 20. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 203-211.
  • 21. Janus J et al. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 416-425.
  • 22. Antonson SA et al. Comparison of different finishing/ polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011; 39 Suppl 1: e9-e17.
  • 23. Gonulol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012; 40 Suppl 2: e64-70.
  • 24. Sirin Karaarslan E et al. Effects of different polishing methods on color stability of resin composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 58-67.
  • 25. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 275-279.
  • 26. St-Georges AJ et al. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 593-597.
  • 27. van Dijken JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K. The effect of different types of composite resin fillings on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 185-189.
  • 28. Checketts MR, Turkyilmaz I, Asar NV. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1265-1270.
  • 29. Ergucu Z, Turkun LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 185-192.
  • 30. Stoddard JW, Johnson GH. An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 491-495.
  • 31. Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G, Rumi G. 3-D surface prof ile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 562-568.
  • 32. Tjan AH, Chan CA. The polishability of posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 138-46.
  • 33. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Miquel C. Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 742-749.
  • 34. Venturini D et al. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 1117.
  • 35. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 102-108.
  • 36. Pala K et al. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach. Dental materials journal 2016; 35: 278-289.
  • 37. Abzal MS et al. Evaluation of surface roughness of three different composite resins with three different polishing systems. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 171-174.
  • 38. Erdemir U et al. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials. Journal of Dental Sciences 2013; 8: 160-169.
  • 39. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Karabulut E. Effect of onestep polishing systems on surface roughness of different f lowable restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 755764.
  • 40. Han L, Ishizaki H, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Morphological analysis of flowable resins after long-term storage or surface polishing with a mini-brush. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 277-284.
7tepe Klinik-Cover
  • ISSN: 2458-9586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Çocuklarda bilişsel seviye ve ağız diş sağlığı: Bir pilot çalışma

Müesser Ahu DURHAN, Seda ÖZSALİH, Mısra ÖZALP, Ömer Birkan AĞRALI, Hanife Nuray YILMAZ, Betül ŞEN YAVUZ, Betül KARGÜL

Farkli cila sistemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri üzerine etkisi

Dilber BİLGİLİ, Ayşe DÜNDAR, Çağatay BARUTÇUGİL, İsmail Burak ÖCAL

Farklı yüzey hazırlık işlemlerinin rezin bazlı, polimer infiltre seramik ve feldspatik cad/cam materyallerinin yüzey pürüzlülüğüne etkisi

Burcu DİKİCİ, ELİF TÜRKEŞ BAŞARAN, Esra CAN

Diabetes mellitus, periapikal enfeksiyon ve kök kanalı tedavisi ilişkisi

Güher BARUT, Beliz ÖZEL, Rabia Figen KAPTAN

Farklı kahve türlerinde bekletilen kompozit rezinlerin renk stabilitelerinin incelenmesi

Suzan CANGÜL, ÖZKAN ADIGÜZEL, Server ÜNAL, Samet TEKİN, Ezgi SONKAYA, Begüm ERPAÇA

Türk popülasyonundaki çocuklarda kronolojik yaş, dişsel yaş ve iskelet yaşı arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi

Derya İÇÖZ, Hilal ÖZBEY, Burak Kerem APAYDIN

Periodontoloji kliniklerine başvuran hastaların periodontal sağlık durumlarının ve sigara kullanımlarının tedavi öncesi ve sonrası klinik parametreler üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif kesitsel bir çalışma (Bölüm II)

Ogül Leman TUNAR, Hare GÜRSOY, Ebru ÖZKAN KARACA, Hazel Zeynep KOCABAŞ, Gizem İNCE KUKA, Bahar KURU

Vertikal alveolar uzantılı modifiye nazoalveoler şekillendirme tedavisi: Olgu sunumu

R. Burcu NUR YILMAZ, Derya ÇAKAN

CAD/CAM sistemiyle hazırlanan üç üyeli monolitik zirkonya ve zirkonyum destekli restorasyonların FDI kriterlerine göre değerlendirilmesi: Bir yıllık klinik split-mouth çalışması

Elçin KESKİN ÖZYER, ERKUT KAHRAMANOĞLU, Yasemin KULAK ÖZKAN

Periodontitis ve tip 2 diyabetli bireylerdeki glisemik kontrolün salya antimikrobiyal peptid seviyesine olan etkisinin incelenmesi

Doğukan YILMAZ, Ali Orkun TOPÇU, Emine Ülke AKÇAY, Ali TAMER, MUSTAFA ALTINDİŞ