DİLEK MENZİLETOĞLU, BOZKURT KUBİLAY IŞIK, Arif Yiğit GÜLER

Ağız, diş ve çene cerrahisinde konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi i̇stek nedenleri

Amaç: Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT), dental ve maksillofasiyal bölgenin görüntülemesi için kullanılan radyografik bir tekniktir. Diş hekimliğinde de kullanımı oldukça sıktır. Çalışmanın amacı, bir Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi bölümünde KIBT istenme nedenleri ve bunların dağılımının belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem : Ağız, Diş ve Çene cerrahisi bölümünde KIBT elde edilmesi için başvuran hastalara ait 974 adet KIBT istek formu incelendi. KIBT istek nedenleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: KIBT isteklerinin sırasıyla: implant planlaması (%43.12), intraosseoz lezyonlar (%19.61), üçüncü molar dişlerin köklerinin mandibular kanal ile olan ilişkisi (% 10.58), gömülü dişlerin lokalizasyonunun saptanması (%8.01), sinüs lifting işlemi (%5.85) ve diğer nedenler (%12.83) için olduğu görüldü. Sonuç: Çalışmamız, KIBT incelemesinin en fazla pre-operatif implant planlaması için istendiğini gösterdi.

Reasons of cone-beam computed tomography requests in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Aim: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), is a radiographic imaging technique that is used for dental and maxillofacial region. the use of cbct are quite frequent in dentistry.. The aim of study was to assess the reasons and distribution of the CBCT requests in a oral and maxillofacial surgery. Materials and Methods: CBCT request forms belonging to 974 patients attending the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, were assessed. The reasons of the KBIT request were recorded. Results: The requested CBCT images were found to be for implant planning (43.12%), jaw lesions (19.61%), relationship of the mandibular canal to the roots of third molars (10.58%), the assesment of the localization of impacted teeth (8.01%), sinus-lifting procedures (%5.85) and other reasons (12.83%), in order. Conclusion: The our study showed that most of the CBCT examinations were requested for pre-operative implant planning.

PDF

___

Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28: 245–248.
Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8:1558–1564.
Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin N Am. 2008; 52: 707–730.
Kammerer PW, Thiem D, Eisenbeiß C, Dau M, Schulze RK, Al-Nawas B, Draenert FG. Surgical evaluation of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for therapy planning of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;121(4):419–424.
Poleti ML, Fernandes LMPS, Oliveira CS, Capelozza AL, Chinellato LE, Rubira IRB. Anatomical variation of the maxillary sinus in cone beam computed tomography. Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:707261.
Friedland B, Metson R. A guide to recognizing maxillary sinus pathology and for deciding on further preoperative assessment prior to maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(6):807–815.
Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103: 114-119.
Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74: 668-679.
Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terekado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95: 371–377.
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 71: 461–468.
Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38: 367–378.
Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of CBCT in OMS: An Overview of Published Indications, and Clinical Usage in US Academic Centers and OMS Practices. J of Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74(4):668-679.
Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Ito K. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35(7):525-528.
Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19(2):228–231.
Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003; 31(11):825–833.
Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6: 31-36.
Honda K, Arai Y, Kashima M, Takano Y, Sawada K, Ejima K, and other. Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(6):391–395.
Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002; 31(2):126– 130.
Heiland M, Schulze D, Rother U, Schmelzle R. Postoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62(11):1387–1391.
Allen F, Smith DG. An assessment of the accuracy of ridge-mapping in planning implant therapy for the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(1):34-38.
Angelopoulos C. Cone beam tomographic imaging anatomy of the maxillofacial region. Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52:731-752.
Ganz SD. Cone beam computed tomography–assisted treatment planning concepts. Dent Clin N Am. 2011;55:515-536.
Treister NS, Friedland B, Woo SB. Use of cone beam computerized tomography for evaluation of biphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral and Max Radiol. 2010; 109: 753-764.
Queresby FA, Savell TA, Palomo JM. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:791-796.
Shiki K, Tanaka T, Kito S, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Oda M, Nishimura S, Morimoto Y. The significance of cone beam computed tomography for the visualization of anatomical variations and lesions in the maxillary sinus for patients hoping to have dental implant-supported maxillary restorations ina private dental office in Japan. Head Face Med. 2014;10:20.
Dammann F, Bootz F, Cohnen M, Hassfeld S, Tatagiba M, Kösling S. Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(23-24):417–423.
Dau M, Edalatpour A, Schulze R, Al-Nawas B, Alshihri A, Kämmerer PW. Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(2):20160081.
Kuhnel TS, Reichert TE. Trauma of the midface. Laryngorhinootologie. 2015; 94(1):206–247.
Malina-Altzinger J, Damerau G, Gratz KW, Stadlinger PD. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1(1):17.
Shahbazian M, Jacobs R. Diagnostic value of 2D and 3D imaging in odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: a review of literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39:294-300.
LarheimTA.Current trends in temporomandibular joint imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:555-576.
Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, et al. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:609-618.
Librizzi ZT, Tadinada AS, Valiyaparambil JV, Lurie AG, Mallya SM. Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:25-30.
Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:152-157.
Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation ab-sorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003, 96: 508-513.
Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005, 128(4): 418-423.
Aboudara CA, Hatcher D, Nielsen IL, Miller A. A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6(Suppl 1):173–175.
Garrett BJ, Caruso JM, Rungcharassaeng K, Farrage JR, Kim JS, Taylor GD. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008, 134(1), 8-9.
Zhao Y, Nguyen M, Gohl E, Mah JK, Sameshima G, Enciso R. Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid palatal expansion evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010, 137: 71-78.
Korbmacher H, Kahl-Nieke B, Schöllchen M, Heiland M. Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems from an orthodontic point of view. J Orofac Orthop 2007, 68(4): 278-289.
Oz U, Orhan K, Abe N. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011, 40(8): 492-500.
Dobbyn Lorna Mary, Joanna Faye Morrison, Laetitia Mary Brocklebank and Lucy Lai-King Chung A survey of the first 6 years of experience with cone beam CT scanning in a teaching hospital orthodontic department J Orthod. 2013, 40(1):14–21.
Fornell J, Johansson L-AO, Bolin A, Isaksson S, Sennerby L. Flapless CBCT-guided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1-year follow-up. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012;23:28-34.
Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:325.
Tay AB, Go WS. Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:592-600.
Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007;19:117-128.
Suomalainen A, Venta I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:276-84.
Domínguez J, Ruge O, Aguilar G, Náñez O, Oliveros G. Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal. Rev Fac Odontol Antioq. 2010;22(1):12-22.
Olutayo J, Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Verhaeghe V, Velde FV, Vinckier F. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw bone: radiological pattern and the potential role of CBCT in Early diagnosis. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010;1:1(2) e3.
Treister NS, Friedland B, Woo SB. Use of cone-beam computerized tomography for evaluation of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:753-764.
Kammerer PW, Thiem D, Eisenbeiß C, Dau M, Schulze RKW, Al-Nawas B, Draenert FG. Surgical evaluation of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for therapy planning of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endod. 2016 Apr;121(4):419-424.
Wilde F, Heufelder M, Lorenz K, et al. Prevalence of cone beam computed tomography imaging findings according to the clinical stage of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2012;114:804-811.