Küresel Tedarik Zinciri Ve Uluslararası Ticaret Yönetiminde Verimli Ödeme Sistemi Seçimi

Bu çalışmada küresel tedarik zincirinde fon akışı için gerekli uluslararası ödemeleri gerçekleştirmek amacıyla kullanılabilecek iki ödeme sistemi olan SWIFT ağı ve blok zincir ağı tabanlı ödeme sistemlerinden hangisinin hangi koşullar altında seçilmesi gerektiği ile ilgili matematiksel modelleme yoluyla bir karar mekanizması oluşturulmuştur. Tedarik zincirlerinde ürün akışının yanında bilgi ve fon akışını da koordine edebilmek büyük önem taşımaktadır. Tüm akışların gecikmeden ve sorunsuz yürütülmesi ile küresel tedarik zinciri ve uluslararası ticaretin yönetiminde yüksek performans elde edilebilir. Bu çalışmada fon akışının zamanında ve sıkıntısız gerçekleştirilmesi için verimli ödeme sistemi seçimi kararı incelenmiştir. Modelde, bu iki ödeme sistemine ait dinamikler, olasılık dağılımları ve diğer parametreler vasıtasıyla ifade edilmiştir. SWIFT ve blok zincir ağı ödeme sistemleri arasında, bu sistemlerin tedarik zinciri için oluşturacakları toplam maliyet ve risklerin beklenen değerlerine göre kıyaslama yapılmıştır. Modelde, toplam ödeme işlem ücreti ve ödeme tamamlanma süresi beklenen değerlerinin daha düşük olduğu sistemin seçilmesi yönelimi gözlenmiştir. Bununla beraber, ödeme sürecinde görev alacak ve alıcı ve satıcıyı temsil edenler harici aracı finansal kurumların sayısı arttıkça blok zincir ağına, ödemede karşı tarafa aktarılacak olan fon miktarı yükseldikçe SWIFT ağına yönelme eğilimi gözlenmiştir.

Efficient Payment System Selection in Global Supply Chains and International Trade Management

In this study, whether to make a cross-border payment in a global supply chain with SWIFT or block chain has been established via mathematical modeling. It is extremely important in supply chains to coordinate information and funds flow as well as physical flow of goods. It will be possible to achieve high performance in a global supply chain and international trade via timely and smooth execution of all flows. In this study we investigated the choice of the cross-border payment system based on the efficiency criteria to accomplish supply chain funds flow on time and without problems. In the model the dynamics of the two payment systems were expressed by means of probability distributions and other parameters. A comparison is then made according to the expected values of the total costs and risks generated by the two payment systems for the supply chain. It is recommended to choose the system with lower expected values of payment processing fee and total processing time. In addition, as the number of intermediary financial institutions taking part in the payment increases the decision mechanism favors block chain network, whereas it favors the SWIFT network as the total amount of funds to be transferred increases.

___

  • Achanta, R. (2018), Cross-Border Money Transfer Using Blockchain-Enabled by Big Data, 5 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://www.infosys.com/industries/ cards-and-payments/resources/Documents/cross-border-money-transfer. pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Ambrosia, D.W. (1980). New SWIFT Rules on The Liability of Financial İnstitutions for İnterest Losses Caused by Delay in İnternational Fund Transfers. Cornell International Law Journal, 13, 311–327.
  • Ba´tiz-Lazo, B. ve Wood, D. (2002). An historical Appraisal of İnformation Technology in Commercial Banking, Electronic Markets, 12, 192–205.
  • Bäuerle, N., & Müller, A. (2006). Stochastic Orders and Risk Measures: Consistency and Bounds. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38(1), 132-148.
  • Beck, R., Becker, C., Lindman, J., & Rossi, M. (2017). Opportunities and risks of blockchain technologies (Dagstuhl Seminar 17132). Dagstuhl Reports, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 7(3), 99-142.
  • Casey, M., Crane, J., Gensler, G., Johnson, S., & Narula, N. (2018). The İmpact of Blockchain Technology on Finance: A Catalyst for Change. International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Cate, R. (2018, Mar). Ripple CEO at Money20/20 Asia: A New Payments System for the Digital Age 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde
  • https://ripple.com/insights/ripple-ceo-money20-20-asia-new-payments-systemdigital-age/ adresinden alındı.
  • Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply. (t.y.), 29 Aralık 2019 tarihinde https://www.cips.org/en-ME/knowledge/procurement-topics-andskills/srm-and-sc-management/global-supply-chains/ adresinden alındı.
  • Cheng, J. ve Geva, B. (2016), Understanding Block Chain and Distributed Financial Technology: New Rails for Payments and an Analysis of Article 4A of the UCC. Business Law Today, 25(7) 1-4.
  • Chopra, S. ve Meindl, P. (2013), Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Boston: Pearson.
  • Curkovic, S., Scannell, T., Wagner, B. ve Vıtek, M. (2013), A Longitudinal Study of Supply Chain Risk Management Relative to COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management Framework, Modern Management Science & Engineering, 1(1), 13-36.
  • Demeyer, M. (2018), Blockchain Technology And Smart Contracts From A Financial Law Perspective, Doktora Tezi, Ghent Üniversitesi, Belçika. 5 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/479 /332/RUG01-002479332_2018_0001_AC.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Deshpande, A., Stewart, K., Lepetit, L. ve Gunashekar, S. (2017), Distributed Ledger Technologies/Blockchain: Challenges, opportunities and the prospects for standards, 6 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://www.bsigroup.com/LocalFiles/zh-tw/InfoSec-newsletter/ No2017 06/download/BSI_Blockchain_DLT_Web.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Exalog–Payments & treasury software. (t.y. a), SWIFT Network International Banking Communication Tool, 29 Aralık 2019 tarihinde http://www.exalog.com/en/swiftnet-network-banking-communication adresinden alındı.
  • Exalog–Payments & Treasury Software. (t.y. b), SWIFT GPI and SEPA İnstant Payment: How Will Companies Benefit? 29 Aralık 2019 tarihinde https://www.exalog.com/en/swift-gpi-and-sepa-instant-payment-howwill-companies-benefit adresinden alındı.
  • Guo, Y. ve Liang, C. (2016), Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry, Financial Innovation, 2(24), 1-12.
  • Ishmaev, G. (2017), Blockchain Technology as an institution of Property, Metaphilosophy, 48(5), 666-686.
  • Ivannikov, N., Cvetkovic, R. ve Lilic., V. (2014), Innovations in International Payments, International Journal of Economics & Law, (11), 45-50.
  • Karaca, O. (2005). Türkiye'de Faiz Oranı ile Döviz Kuru Arasındaki Ilişki: Faizlerin Düşürülmesi Kurları Yükseltir mi? (No. 2005/14). Discussion Paper. 30 Ocak tarihinde https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/ 83232/1/dp_2005-14.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Kozolchyk, B. (1992). The Paperless Letter of Credit and Related Documents of Title. Law and Contemporary Problems, 55, 31–101.
  • Manuj, I. ve Mentzer, J. T. (2008a), Global Supply Chain Risk Management, Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 133-155.
  • Manuj, I., ve Mentzer, J. T. (2008b), Global Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192-223.
  • Mohanty, D. (2019), Ripple & Stablecoins, India: BPB Publications. Morabito, V. (2017), Business Innovation Through Blockchain. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Mosakheil, J. H. (2018), Security Threats Classification in Blockchains. 5 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1093&context=msia_etds adresinden alındı.
  • Moslemi, A., Hilmola, O. P. ve Vilko, J. (2016), Risks in Emerging Markets: Logistics Services in the Mediterranean Region, Maritime Business Review, 1(3), 253-272.
  • Müller, A., & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (Vol. 389). New York: Wiley.
  • Nakamoto, S. (2019), Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 29 Aralık 2019 tarihinde https://git.dhimmel.com/bitcoin-whitepaper/ adresinden alındı.
  • Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A. ve Goldfeder, S. (2016), Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: a Comprehensive İntroduction, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Oh, J. ve Shong, I. (2017), A Case Study on Business Model İnnovations Using Blockchain: Focusing on Financial İnstitutions, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 335-344.
  • Park, Y. S. (2007), Innovations in International Payment Systems and Their Implications for Banks, 29 Aralık 2019 tarihinde https://home.gwu.edu/~yspark/Files/5.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Qiu, T., Zhang, R. ve Gao, Y. (2019), Ripple vs. SWIFT: Transforming Cross Border Remittance Using Blockchain Technology, Procedia Computer Science, 147, 428-434.
  • Ripple. (t. y.), 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://ripple.com/xrp/ adresinden alındı.
  • Rosner, M. T. ve Kang, A. (2015), Understanding and Regulating Twenty-First Century Payment Systems: The Ripple Case Study, Michigan Law Review, 114(649), 649-681.
  • Sarwar, S. (Feb, 2018). Ripple Looks Unstoppable – Both xCurrent and xRapid Lures Financial Sector. 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://cryptocurrencynews.com/daily-news/ripple-news/ripple-looksunstoppable-xcurrent-xrapid/ adresinden alındı.
  • Scannell, T., Curkovic, S. ve Wagner, B. (2013), Integration of ISO 31000: 2009 and Supply Chain Risk Management, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(4), 367-377.
  • Scott S.V. ve Zachariadis, M. (2012), Origins and Development of SWIFT, London School of Economics, Business History, 54(3), 462-482.
  • Sivitska, Y. (2018). The influence of cryptocurrency on the future of the international financial payment system through the example of a bitcoin. 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde http://srd.pgasa.dp.ua:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/836/Sivitska.pdf ?sequence=1&isAllowed=y adresinden alındı.
  • Stiglitz, J. E., & Rothschild, M. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition., Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225-243.
  • Swan, M. (2018). Blockchain for Business: Next-Generation Enterprise Artificial İntelligence Systems. Advances in computers, 111, 121-162.
  • The World Bank. (2018, Mar). Remittance Prices Worldwide. 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://remittanceprices.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/rpw _report_march2018.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Underwood, S. (2016), Blockchain Beyond Bitcoin, Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 15-17.
  • Vanetti, M. (2018). The Future of Cross-Boarder Payments. Yayımlanmamış Tez, Nova School of Business and Economics, Lisbon, Portekiz. 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/36376/1/Vanetti_2018.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Vennervirta, E. (2019). Blockchain and EU Trade Finance: Achieving Single Market Harmonisation Through Payment System İmprovement. Yayımlanmamış Tez, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Finlandiya, 30 Ocak 2020 tarihinde
  • https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/170482/Vennervirta_Erika.pdf?s equence=2 adresinden alındı.
  • Wu, B., ve Duan., T. (2019, March), The Application of Blockchain Technology in Financial markets, Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1176, No. 042094). IOP Publishing.
  • Wu, T., ve Liang., X. (2017, August), Exploration and practice of inter-bank application based on blockchain, 2017 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE) (pp. 219-224). IEEE.
  • Wüst, K., ve Gervais, A. (2018, Haziran), Do you need a Blockchain? 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT) (pp. 45- 54). IEEE.
Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-4646
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF