BİST’te İşlem Gören Faktoring Şirketlerinin Mali Yapılarının Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Değerlendirilmesi

Öz Ticaretin yurt içi ve yurt dışı finansmanında önemli bir rol oynayan faktoring şirketlerine duyulan ihtiyaç giderek artmaktadır. Faktoring hizmeti almak isteyen işletmeler için en uygun faktoring şirketini belirlemek, birçok faktörün dikkate alınması gereken çok ölçütlü karar verme (ÇÖKV) problemi olarak görülmektedir. Bu nedenle işletmelerin kendi finansman yapısına uygun faktoring şirketini seçmesi çok önemli hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışmada Borsa İstanbul'da (BİST) işlem gören 7 adet faktoring firması 2013-2016 yıllarındaki bilanço ve gelir tabloları dikkate alınarak mali açıdan değerlendirilmiştir. Veriler, Kamuya Aydınlatma Platformundan (KAP) elde edilmiştir. Ölçütler, literatür taraması sonucu belirlenmiştir. Şirketlerin değerlendirilmesinde ÇÖKV yöntemlerinden olan, Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS), Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA)  and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) yöntemleri bütünleşik olarak kullanılmıştır. 2013-2016 yılları bütüncül olarak değerlendirildiğinde her üç yönteme göre ilk sırayı YKFKT ve GARFA, son sırayı ise SMRFT şirketinin aldığı görülmüştür.

___

  • Zolfani, S. H., Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Sustainable development of rural areas’ building structures based on local climate. Procedia Engineering, 57, 1295-1301.
  • Zolfani, S. H., Bahrami, M. (2014). Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARACOPRAS approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(3), 534- 553 Zolfani, S. H., Pourhossein, M., Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework. Alexandria Engineering Journal.
  • Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159-172
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Vainiūnas, P., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitienė, J. (2012). Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(02), 501-520.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Sušinskas, S., Daniūnas, A., Turskis, Z., Sivilevičius, H. (2012). Multiple criteria selection of pile-column construction technology. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18(6), 834-842.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J., Kalibatas, D. (2008c). Assessment of indoor environment applynig COPRAS method with attributes determined in intervals, in 7th International Conference on Environmental Engineering, May 22-23, 2008 Vilnius, Lithuania, 1-3, 907-912.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J. (2008b.) Contractor selection multiattribute model applynig COPRAS method with grey interval numbers. in 20th International Conference/Euro Mini Conference on Continuous Optimization and Knowledge-Based Technologies (EurOPT 2008), May 20-23, 2008 Neringa, Lithuania. Vilnius: Technika, 241-247.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J. (2008a). Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), 85-93.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Multicriteria Evaluation of Building (Pastatų sistemotechninis įvertinimas). Vilnius: Technika
  • Zamani, M., Rabbani, A., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Turskis, Z. (2014). An integrated model for extending brand based on fuzzy ARAS and ANP methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(3), 403-423.
  • Xı, F. ve Zhang, L. (2011). A personnel selection model based on TOPSIS. Management science and Engineering, 5(3), 07-110.
  • Vytautas, B., Marija, B., Vytautas, P. (2015). Assessment of neglected areas in Vilnius city using MCDM and COPRAS methods. Procedia Engineering, 122, 29-38.
  • Varmazyar, M., Dehghanbaghi, M., Afkhami, M. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 58, 125-140.
  • Vafaeipour, M., Zolfani, S. H., Varzandeh, M. H. M., Derakhti, A., Eshkalag, M. K. (2014). Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 653-663.
  • Uzsilaityte, L., Martinaitis, V. (2010). Search for optimal solution of public building renovation in terms of life cycle. Journal of Environment Enginnering and Landscape Management, 18(2), 102-110
  • Tupenaite, L., Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., Seniut, M. (2010). Multiple criteria assessment for built and human environment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(2), 257-266.
  • Tosun, D. (2007). Bir İhracat Finansman Yöntemi Olarak Faktoring: Dünya ve Türkiye Uygulaması. (Yayınlanmamaış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Kocaeli.
  • Tiryaki, B. (2006). Factoring İşlemi ve Factoring İşleminin Hukuki Niteliği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 189-214.
  • Štreimikienė, D., Šliogerienė, J., Turskis, Z. (2016). Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania. Renewable Energy, 85, 148-156.
  • Stratejifactoring: http://www.stratejifactoring.com.tr/factoring_nedir.html
  • Sliogeriene, J., Turskis, Z., Streimikiene, D. (2013). Analysis and choice of energy generation technologies: The multiple criteria assessment on the case study of Lithuania. Energy Procedia, 32, 11-20.
  • Sliogeriene, J., Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Bivainis, J., Seniut, M. (2009). Environment factors of energy companies and their effect on value: analysis model and applied method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15 (3), 490-521.
  • Şişman, B., Doğan, M. (2016). Türk Bankalarının Finansal Performanslarının Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık MOORA Yöntemleri İle Değerlendirilmesi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 353-371.
  • Sindhu, S., Nehra, V., Luthra, S. (2017). Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 496-511.
  • Shariati, S., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Salsani, A., Tamošaitienė, J. (2014). Proposing a New Model for Waste Dump Site Selection: Case Study of Ayerma Phosphate Mine. Engineering Economics, 25(4), 410-419.
  • Ruzgys, A., Volvačiovas, R., Ignatavičius, Č., Turskis, Z. (2014). Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 103-110.
  • Reza, S., Majid, A. (2013). Ranking Financial Institutions Based on of Trust in online banking Using ARAS and ANP Method. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 6(4), 415-423.
  • Ravi, V. (2011). Selection of third-party reverse logistics providers for End-of-Life computers using TOPSIS-AHP based approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 11(1):24-37.
  • Ravaş, O.C., David, A. (2010). Factoring Agreement-Financing Method For The Companies In Lack of Cash-Flow. Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 10 (4), 289-296
  • Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 7316-7327.
  • Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A., Ataei, M. (2012). Using TOPSIS approaches for predictive porphyry Cu potential mapping: A case study in Ahar-Arasbaran area (NW, Iran). Computers & Geosciences, 49:62-71.
  • Özdemir, Z. (2005). Dış Ticaret Finansman Tekniklerinden Faktoring ve Forfaiting İşlemleri. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10 (2), 194-224.
  • Özbek, A. (2017). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ve Excel İle Problem Çözümü. 1. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Özbek, A., Eren, T. (2013). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Teknikleri İle Hizmet Sağlayıcı Seçimi. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 36,1-22.
  • Özbek, A. (2015c). Supplier Selection with Fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(18), 114-125.
  • Özbek, A. (2015b). Efficiency Analysis of Foreign-Capital Banks in Turkey by OCRA and MOORA. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6 (13), 21-30.
  • Özbek, A. (2015a). Akademik Birim Yöneticilerinin MOORA Yöntemiyle Seçilmesi: Kırıkkale Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 38(1), 1-18.
  • Özbek, A. (2014). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarında Yöneticilerin Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım İle Seçilmesi. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 6(2), 4-15.
  • Özbek, A. (2013). Performance evaluation of learning management system. NWSA-Education Sciences, 8 (2),156-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2013.8.2.1C0580
  • Öncel, A. (1991). Factoring’in Uluslararası Yapısı. İSO Dergisi
  • Ölmez, İ. (2012). Türkiye’de Faktoring ve Faktoring İşlemlerinin Muhasebeleştirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Nuuter, T., Lill, I., Tupenaite, L. (2015). Comparison of housing market sustainability in European countries based on multiple criteria assessment. Land Use Policy, 42, 642-651.
  • Nguyen, H. T., Dawal, S. Z. M., Nukman, Y., Aoyama, H., Case, K. (2015). An integrated approach of fuzzy linguistic preference based AHP and fuzzy COPRAS for machine tool evaluation. PloS one, 10(9), 1-24.
  • Mulliner, E., Malys, N., Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146-156.
  • Mousavi-Nasab, S. H., Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2017). A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Materials & Design, 121, 237-253.
  • Medineckiene, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Björk, F., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 15(1), 11-18.
  • Mavi, R. K., Goh, M., Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-18.
  • Mandal, U. K., &Sarkar, B. (2012). Selection of Best Intelligent Manufacturing System Under Fuzzy MOORA Conflicting MCDM Environment. International Journal Of Engineering Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(9), 301-310.
  • Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Lu, C., Shan, M. M. (2014). Application of interval 2-tuple linguistic MULTIMOORA method for health-care waste treatment technology evaluation and selection. Waste Management, 34(11), 2355-2364.
  • Liou, J. J., Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K.,Tzeng, G. H. (2016). New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 114-134.
  • Liao, C. N., Fu, Y. K., Wu, L. C. (2016). Integrated FAHP, ARAS-F and MSGP methods for green supplier evaluation and selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 651-669.
  • Li, Q. (2016). Weighted absolute degree of grey incidence with TOPSIS and its application. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 6(2), 281-291.
  • Kracka, M., Brauers, W. K. M, Zavadskas, E.Z. (2010). Ranking heating losses in a building by applying the MULTIMOORA. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 21(4), 352-359.
  • Kouchaksaraei, R.H, Zolfani, S.H, Golabchi,M.(2015). Glasshouse locating based on SWARACOPRAS approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management,19(2),111- 122
  • Koch, S. (2015). Efects of Shareholder Groups on the Faktoring Institutions Profitability: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7 (11), 39-51.
  • Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243-258.
  • Keršulienė, V., Turskis, Z. (2014). An integrated multi-criteria group decision making process: selection of the chief accountant. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 897-904.
  • Keršulienė, V., Turskis, Z. (2011). Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 645-666.
  • Kaur, H., Dhaliwal, N. K. (2014). Financial Analysis of Factoring Companies in India: A Study of SBI Global Factors and Canbank Factors. International Journal of Research in Management, Science & Technology, 2(1), 30-34.
  • Karande, P. , Chakraborty, S. (2012). Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection, Materials & Design, 37, 317-324.
  • Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Stanujkic, D. (2016). The framework for the selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS methods under uncertainties. Informatica, 27(1), 49-65.
  • Karabašević, D., Stanujkić, D., Urošević, S., Maksimović, M. (2016). An approach to personnel selection based on SWARA and WASPAS methods. Bizinfo (Blace) Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 7(1), 1-11.
  • Karabašević, D., Stanujkić, D., & Urošević, S. (2015). The MCDM model for personnel selection based on SWARA ARAS methods. Management časopis za teoriju i praksu menadžmenta, 77, 43-52.
  • Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Naimaviciene, J., Krutinis, M., Plakys, V., Venskus, D. (2010). Model for a Complex Analysis of Intelligent Built Environment. Automation in Construction, 19(3), 326-340.
  • Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Raslanas, S. (2005). Multivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of building refurbishments. Energy and Buildings, 37(4), 361-372.
  • Janekova, J. (2012). Faktoring-Alternative Source of A Company. Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara. International Journal of Engineering, 10 (3), 303-306.
  • İnal, Z.(2006). Faktoring Uygulamaları ve İşletmelerin Finansal Yapılarına Etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İnönü Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Malatya.
  • Hasan Aghdaie, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods. Engineering Economics, 24(1), 5-17.
  • Günay, B. (2013). Türkiye’de Leasing Ve Leasing Şirketlerinin Etkinliklerinin VZA İle Ölçülmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
  • Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J. S., Goodarzi, G. H. (2014). Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75(5-8), 1115-1130.
  • Ghadikolaei, A. S., Esbouei, S. K., Antuchevičienė, J. (2014). Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(2), 274-291.
  • Ghadikolaei, A. S., Esbouei, S. K. (2014). Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS for evaluating financial performance. Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática, 32(2), 163-174.
  • Gadakh, V. S., Shinde, V. B., Khemnar, N. S. (2013). Optimization of welding process parameters using MOORA method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69(9-12), 2031-2039.
  • FKB: https://www.fkb.org.tr/sektorler/faktoring/. 25.03.2017
  • FCI: https://fci.nl/en/about-factoring/statistics. 26.03.2017
  • Ergül, N., Akel, V. (2010). Finansal Kiralama Şirketlerinin Finansal Performansının TOPSIS Yöntemi ile Analizi. MÖDAV Dergisi, 3, 91-118
  • Ece, N., Özdemir, F. (2011). Halka Açık Finansal Kiralama ve Faktoring Şirketlerinin Performans Ölçümü ve Analizinde Kullanılan EVA ve TOPSIS Yöntemlerinin Hisse Senedi Değerleri ile Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar.48(561),.83-95
  • Dehnavi, A., Aghdam, I. N., Pradhan, B.,Varzandeh, M. H. M. (2015). A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. Catena, 135, 122-148.
  • Datta, S., Beriha, G. S., Patnaik, B., Mahapatra, S. S. (2009). Use of compromise ranking method for supervisor selection: A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 1(1), 7-13
  • Das, M. C., Sarkar, B.,Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241.
  • Darji, V. P., Rao, R. V. (2014). Intelligent multi criteria decision making methods for material selection in sugar industry. Procedia Materials Science, 5, 2585-2594
  • Chu, J., Su, Y. (2012). The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3,391-397.
  • Cheng, S., Chan, C. W., Huang, G. H. (2002).Using multiple criteria decision analysis for supporting decisions of solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 37(6), 975-990.
  • Chatterjee, P.,Chakraborty, S. (2012). Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Materials & Design, 35, 384-393.
  • Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M., Chakraborty, S. (2011). Materials selection using complex propoptional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Matherials &Design, 32(2), 851-860
  • Chatterjee, N.,Bose, G. (2013). Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(4), 535-546
  • Chamodrakas, I., Martakos, D.(2012). A utility-based fuzzy TOPSIS method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless Networks. Applied Soft Computing, 12(7),1929-1938.
  • Chakraborty, S (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. The International Journal of Advanced ManufacturingTechnology, 54(9-12), 1155-1166.
  • Causa, H., Brauers, W.K.M. (2014). Location of a seaport by MOORA optimization. In: Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, 275-280
  • Brauers, W.K.M,, Zavadskas, E.K., Kildienė, S. (2014). Was the Construction Sector in 20 European Countries Anti-cyclical during the Recession Years 2008-2009 as Measured by Multicriteria Analysis (MULTIMOORA). Procedia Computer Science, 31,949-956
  • Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K., Peldschus, F.,Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi objective decision making for road design. Transport, 23(3),183-193.
  • Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K., (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445.
  • Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Robustness of MULTIMOORA: a method for multiobjective optimization. Informatica, 23(1), 1-25
  • Brauers, W. K. M., Balezentis, A.i Balezentis, T., (2011). MULTIMORA forthe EU Member States updated with fuzzy number theory. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2, 259-290. http://dx.doi.Org/10.3846/20294913.2011.580566
  • Bloomberght:http://www.bloomberght.com/haberler/haber/1907784-leasing-faktoring-vefinansman- sirketlerinin-aktif-buyuklugu-100-milyari-asti. 26.03.2017
  • Banerjee, P. K. (2003). Performance Evaluation of Indian Factoring Business: A Study of SBI Factors and Commercial Services Limited, and Canbank Factors Limited. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 7(1), 55-68.
  • Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K. (2008). Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach. Omega - International Journal of Management Science, 36 (3), 429-441
  • Baležentis, T., Streimikiene, D. (2017). Multi-criteria ranking of energy generation scenarios with Monte Carlo simulation. Applied Energy, 185, 862-871.
  • Bağcı, H., Esmer, Y. (2016). PROMETHEE Yöntemi İle Faktoring Şirketi Seçimi. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 116-129.
  • Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., Omrani, H. (2011). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12270-12280
  • Arıkan Kargı, V. S. (2016). Supplier Selection for A Textile Company Using The Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Journal of Management & Economics, 23(3), 789-803.
  • Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A., Zavadskas, E. K. (2011). Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods. Informatica, 22(3), 319-338.
  • Alimardani, M., Zolfani, S. H., Aghdaie, M. H., Tamošaitienė, J. (2013). A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(3), 533-548.
  • Akhavan, P., Barak, S., Maghsoudlou, H., Antuchevičienė, J. (2015). FQSPM-SWOT for strategic alliance planning and partner selection; case study in a holding car manufacturer company. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(2), 165-185.
  • Akel, V., Nuray, E., Sezayi, D. (2010). İMKB’de İşlem Gören Finansal Kiralama Şirketlerinin 2005- 2008 Dönemi Finansal Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 271-292.