Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi ve Bulanık Dematel Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması Yazılım Seçimi ve Değerlendirilmesi

Öz İşletmelerde kurumsal kaynak planlaması (KKP) yatırımları stratejik bir faaliyet olup süreçlerin etkin yönetilmesini ve verimliliği etkileyen uzun dönemli bir karardır. Bu nedenle doğru KKP yazılımının seçilmesi işletmelerin rekabet avantajı sağlamaları ve sürdürülebilir olmaları için hayati bir öneme sahiptir. Fakat KKP yazılım seçimi nicel ve nitel özellikteki çok kriterli bir karar problemi olup birçok alternatif arasında seçim yapmayı gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışmada fason imalat ve makine bakım konularında faaliyet gösteren bir imalat firmasında öncelikle sistem analizi çalışması yapılarak ihtiyaç listesi çıkarılmıştır. Sonrasında oluşan bu seçim kriterlerine göre, nihai olarak karar verilen iki yazılım firmasının uygulama yazılımlarında bulanık analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi kullanılarak seçim süreci gerçekleştirilmiştir. Buna ek olarak KKP seçimine konu olan seçim kriterlerinin etkileyen ve etkilenen ilişkileri bulanık DEMATEL yöntemi ile değerlendirilerek seçim sonrası KKP yazılımının kurulumunda rehber olacak stratejik bir yol haritası oluşturulmuştur. 

___

  • Abdel-Kader, M. G., Ve Dugdale, D. (2001). Evaluating Investments In Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Fuzzy Set Theory Approach. The British Accounting Review, 33(4), 455- 489.
  • Abdullah, L., ve Zulkifli, N. (2015). Integration Of Fuzzy AHP And İnterval Type-2 Fuzzy DEMATEL: An Application To Human Resource Management. Expert Sytem With Applications, 42, 4397-4409.
  • Akça, Y., Ve Özer, G. (2013). Kullanıcı Özelliklerinin Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması Uygulama Başarısına ve Algılanan Organizasyonel Performansa Etkisi. Journal Of Yaşar University, 30(8), 4966-4984.
  • Aksakal, E., ve Dağdeviren, M. (2010). ANP ve DEMATEL Yöntemleri İle Personel Seçimi Problemine Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 905-913.
  • Alanbay, O. (2005). ERP Selection Using Expert Choice Software. ISAHP Honolulu, Hawai.
  • Altan, Ş., ve Aydın, E. K. (2015). Bulanık DEMATEL ve Bulanık TOPSİS Yöntemleri İle Üçüncü Parti Lojistik Firma Seçimi İçin Bütünleşik Bir Model Yaklaşımı. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 20(3), 99-119.
  • Amalnick, M. S., Ansarinejad2, A., Nargesi, S.-M., ve Taheri, S. (2011). New Perspective To ERP Critical Success Factors: Priorities And Causal Relations Under Fuzzy Environment. The Journal Of Mathematics And Computer Science, 2(1), 160-170.
  • Ayağ, Z., ve Özdemir, R. G. (2006). A Fuzzy AHP Approach To Evaluating Machine Tool Alternatives. Journal Of Intellectual Manufacturing, 17, 179-190.
  • Baki, B., ve Çakar, K. (2005). Determining The ERP Package-Selecting Criteria: The Case Of Turkish Manufacturing Companies. Business Process Management Journal, 11(1), 75-86.
  • Bernroider, E., ve Koch, S. (2001). ERP Selection Process İn Midsize And Large Organizations. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 251-257.
  • Burgués, X., Xavier, I., Joan, F., ve Pastor, A. (2000). Formalising ERP Selection Criteria. In Proceedings Of The Tenth International Workshop On Software Specification And Design. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 251 - 257
  • Büyüközkan, G., ve Çiftçi, G. (2012). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach Based On Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP And Fuzzy TOPSIS To Evaluate Green Suppliers. Expert Systems With Applications, 39, 3000-3011.
  • Cebeci, U. (2009). Fuzzy AHP-Based Decision Support System For Selecting ERP Systems İn Textile İndustry By Using Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems With Applications, 36, 8900-8909.
  • Chang, A.-Y., ve Chen, C.-J. (2011). Analysing Critical Factors Of Introducing RFID İnto An Enterprise- An Application Of AHP And DEMATEL Method. Ibternational Journal Of Industrial Engineering, 18(7), 323-334.
  • Chang, B., Chang, C.W., ve Wu, C.-H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL Method For Developing Supplier Selection Criteria. Expert Sytems With Applications, 38, 1850-1858.
  • Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Application Of The Extend Analysis Method On Fuzzy AHP. European Journal Of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
  • Chou, Y.C., Sun, C.C., ve Yen, H.Y. (2012). Evaluating The Criteria For Human Resource For Science And Technology (HRST) Based On An İntegrated Fuzzy AHP And Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach. Applied Soft Computing, 12, 64-71.
  • Dağdeviren, M. (2007). Performans Değerlendirme Sürecinin Bulanık AHP İle Bütünleşik Modellenmesi. Mühendislik Ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(3), 268-282.
  • Edward Bernroider Stefan Koch, (2001),"ERP selection process in midsize and large organizations", Jahanshahi, H., Farhadzareh, B., Fotuhi, H., Mokhtari, A. G., ve Bagher, M. (2013). A New Algorithm For ERP System Selection Based On Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach. Advances İn Environmental Biology, 7(9), 2509-2521.
  • Jassbi, J., Mohamadnejad, F., ve Nasrollahzadeh, H. (2011). A Fuzzy DEMATEL Framework For Modeling Cause And Effect Relationships Of Strategy Map. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(5), 5967-5973.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., ve Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-Attribute Comparison Ofcatering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case Of Turkey. International Journal Of Production Economics, 87, 171-184.
  • Karaarslan, N., ve Gundogar, E. (2009). An Application For Modular Capability-Based ERP Software Selection Using AHP Method. The International Journal Of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 42, 1025-1033.
  • Karaoğlan, S., ve Şahin, S. (2016). DEMATEL Ve AHP Yöntemleri İle İşletmelerin Satın Alma Problemine Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım, DSLR Kamera Örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 359-375.
  • Karsak, E. E., & Özogul, C. O. (2009). An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection. Expert systems with Applications, 36(1), 660-667.
  • Kılıç, H. S., Zaim, S., ve Delen, D. (2014). Development Of A Hybrid Methodology For ERP System Selection: The Case Of Turkish Airlines. Decision Support Systems, 66, 82-92.
  • Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2015). Selecting "The Best" ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), 2343-2352.
  • Kocak, A. (2003). Yazılım Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi Yaklaşımı Ve Bir Uygulama. Ege Academic Review, 3(1), 67-77.
  • Kumar, A., ve Dash, M. K. (2016). Using DEMATEL To Construct Influential Network Relation Map Of Consumer Decision-Making İn E-Marketplace. International Journal Of Business Information Systems, 21(1), 48-72.
  • Kwong, C., ve Bai, H. (2003). Determining The Importance Weights For The Customer Requirements İn QFD Using A Fuzzy AHP With An Extent Analysis Approach. IIE Transactions, 35(7), 619-626.
  • Leung, L., ve Cao, D. (2000). On Consistency And Ranking Of Alternatives İn Fuzzy AHP. European Journal Of Operational Research, 124, 102-113.
  • Lien, C. T., & Liang, S. K. (2005). An ERP system selection model with project management viewpoint-A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of the Information Systems for Logistics and Management, 1(1), 39-46.
  • Liou, T. S., ve Wang, M. J. J. (1992). Ranking Fuzzy Numbers With İntegral Value. Fuzzy Sets And Systems, 50(3), 247-255.
  • Opricovic, S., ve Tzeng, G.-H. (2003). Defuzzification Within A Multicriteria Decision Model. International Journal Of Uncertaintry, Fuziness And Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(05), 635-652.
  • Perera, H. S. C., ve Costa, W. K. R. (2008). Analytic Hierarchy Process For Selection Of ERP Software For Manufacturing Companies. Vision, 12(4), 1-11.
  • Ranjan, S., Jha, V. K., ve Pal, P. (2016). A Strategic And Sustainable Multi-Criteria Decision Making Framework For ERP Selection İn OEM. International Journal Of Applied Engineering Research, 11(3), 1916-1926.
  • Reuther, D., ve Chattopadhyay, G. (2004). Critical Factors For Enterprise Resources Planning System Selection And İmplementation Projects Within Small To Medium Enterprises. Engineering Management Conference (S. 851-855). IEEE International.
  • Rouhani, A., Ashrafi, A., ve Afshari, S. (2013). Segmenting Critical Success Factors For ERP Implementation Using Integrated Fuzzy AHP And Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(8), 1066-1079.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic Foundation Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How To Make A Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal Of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
  • Shuai, J., ve Kao, C. Y. (2008). Building An Effective ERP Selection System For The Technology İndustry. Industrial Engineering And Engineering Management (S. 989-993). IEEE.
  • Silva, J., Goncalves, J. J., Fernandes, J. A., ve Cunha, M. M. (2013). Criteria For ERP Selection Using An AHP Approach. Information Systems And Technologies (S. 1-6). IEEE.
  • Tolga, E., Demircan, M. L., ve Kahraman, C. (2005). Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy Replacement Analysis And Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal Of Production Economics, 97, 89-117.
  • Tsai, W. H., ve Chou, W. C. (2009). Selecting Management Systems For Sustainable Development In Smes: A Novel Hybrid Model Based On DEMATEL, ANP, And ZOGP. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(2), 1444-1458.
  • Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
  • Vatansever, K., ve Uluköy, M. (2013). Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması Sistemlerinin Bulanık AHP Ve Bulanık MOORA Yöntemleriyle Seçimi: Üretim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. CBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 274-273.
  • Wei, C. C., Chien, C. F., ve Wang, M. J. J. (2005). An AHP-Based Approach To ERP System Selection. International Journal Of Production Economics, 96, 47-62.
  • Wei, C. C., ve Wang, M. J. J. (2004). A Comprehensive Framework For Selecting An ERP System. International Journal Of Project Management, 22, 161-169.
  • Wu, H. Y. (2012). Constructing A Strategy Map For Banking İnstitutions With Key Performance İndicators Of The Balanced Scorecard. Evaluation And Program Planning, 35(3), 303- 320.
  • Wu, H.-H., ve Tsai, Y.-N. (2012). An İntegrated Approach Of AHP And DEMATEL Methods In Evaluating The Criteria Of Auto Spare Part İndustry. International Journal Of System Science, 43(11), 2114-2124.
  • Wu, W. W., ve Lee, Y. (2007). Developing Global Managers' Competencies Using The Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. Expert Systems With Applications, 32(2), 499-507.
  • Yang, J. L., ve Tzeng, G. H. (2011). An Integrated MCDM Technique Combined With DEMATEL For A Novel Cluster-Weighted With ANP Method. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(3), 1417-1424.
  • Yang, Y. P. O., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., ve Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined With DEMATEL And ANP With Applications. International Journal Of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information And Control,, 8(3), 338-353.
Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-0064
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi