Planning Education in the Case Study of the Course of Metropolitan Planning in Istanbul

This paper examines the courses, which are called “Metropolitan Planning in Istanbul” in Marmara University, using a Bourdieu’s participant objectivation method. These courses are in Global Cities and Istanbul Studies Master’s Program in which there is a protocol between Marmara University and Turkish Association of Municipalities. Most of students in this program have been working at different level management in several municipalities. They got a scholarship according to the protocol. The courses are about planning theory and practices. The center of discussion in these courses is the planning agenda of Istanbul. This text discusses the possibilities and the hidden hardships of teaching planning, using the Istanbul Metropolitan Planning course in 2016-2017 academic year, as a case study.

___

  • Allmendinger, Phılıp. Planning Theory, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire 2009. American Planning Association, Planning and Urban Design Standards, John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Archer, Margeret S. “Kollektif Düşünümsellik: İlişkisel Bir Örnek”, Cristoher Powell, François Depelteau, İlişkisel Sosyoloji, Özlem Akkaya (çev.), Phoenix Yayınları, Ankara 2015. Bourdieu, Peter. Homo Academicus, Stanford University Press, California 1988. Bourdieu, Peter; Louis J. Wacquant. Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji İçin Cevaplar. Nazlı Ökten (çev), İletişim Yayınları, Istanbul 2003. Campbell, Scott; Susan S. Fainstein. “The Structures and Debates of Planning Theory”, Scott Campbell, Susan S. Fainstein, (ed.), Readings in Planning Theory, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2005, s. 1-16. Castells, Manuel. Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi/Enformasyon Çağı: Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür (Cilt 1), Ebru Kılıç (çev.), Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul 2005. Castells, Manuel. Kent, Sınıf, İktidar. Asuman Erendil (çev.), Bilim ve Sanat, Ankara 1997. Erder, Sema. Köysüz ‘Köylü’Göçü, Görüş, 34, 1998, s. 24-26. Friedmann, John. Planning In The Public Domain: From Knowledge To Action, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 1987. Gordon, Thomas. Etkili Ana Baba Eğtiminde Uygulamalar, Emel Aksay(çev.), Sistem Yayıncılık, Istanbul 2001. Gordon, Thomas. Etkili Öğretmenli Eğitimi, Emel Aksay(çev.), Sistem Yayıncılık, Istanbul 2002. Gülersoy, Nuran Z.; et al. Türkiye‘de Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Eğitiminde Kalite Geliştirme ve Akreditasyon, Türkiye Planlama Okulları Birliği III. Dönem Çalışmaları, İTU Şehir ve Bölge Planlaması Bölümü, İstanbul 2007. Harvey, David. Kent Deneyimi, Esin Soğancılar (çev.), Sel Yayıncılık, Istanbul 2016. Harvey, David. Postmodernliğin Durumu, Sungur Savran (çev.), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul 1999. Healey, Patsy. “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, vol. 23, no. 2, 1996, s. 217-234. Heywood, Andrew. Politics, Palgrave, 2013. Keleş, Ruşen. Kentleşme Politikası, İmge Yayınları, Ankara, 2012. Kuran, Timur. Yalanla Yaşamak, Alp Tümertekin (çev), Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul 2013. Lefebvre, Henri. Mekânın Üretimi, Işık Ergüden (çev.), Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2014. Ozkan, Birsen. Mutlu Aile Mutlu Çocuk, Final Yayınları, İstanbul 2015. Sandercock, Leonie. “Towards cosmopolis: Utopia as construction site”, Scott Campbell, Susan S. Fainstein, (ed.), Readings in Planning Theory, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2005, s.401-10. Tasan-Kok, Tuna; et al. ““Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”: giving voice to planning practitioners”, Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 17, No 4, 2016, s. 621-51. Thomas, Jane M. “Educating Planners: Unified Diversity for Social Action”, Scott Campbell, Susan S. Fainstein, (ed.), Readings in Planning Theory, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2005, s. 356-75. UN-HABITAT, National Urban Policy: A Guiding Framework, UN-Habitat, HS Number: HS/090/15E, 2015. Vygotsky, L. S. Düşünce ve Dil, S. Koray (çev.), Kuram Yayınları, İstanbul 1998.