___

• Aguinis, H. ve Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda, Journal of Management, 38, 932–68.
• Allen, N. J., ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The Measurement And Antecedents of Affective, Continuance And Normative Commitment To The Organization, Journal of Occuptional Psychology, 63: 1-18.
• Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
• Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Kuchinke, K. P., ve Iqbal, A. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Pakistani higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2352-2363.
• Aydoğan, E., ve Deniz, G. (2018). İşgörenlerin Dışsal Prestij Ve Örgütsel Destek Algısının Pozitif Örgütsel Çıktılar Üzerindeki Etkisi: Butik Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 36 (1): 17-37.
• Backhaus, K., Stone, B., ve Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292-318.
• Besieux, T., Baillien, E., Verbeke, A. L., ve Euwema, M. C. (2018). What goes around comes around: The mediation of corporate social responsibility in the relationship between transformational leadership and employee engagement. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(2), 249-271.
• Bhattacharya, C. B., Sankar S., ve Korschun, D. (2008). Using Corporate Social Responsibility To Win The War For Talent, MIT Sloan Management Review, 49 (2): 37-44.
• Boğan, E., Türkay, O., ve Dedeoğlu, B. B. (2018). Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction: The mediator role of organizational identification. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 10(2), 51-67.
• Bouraoui, K., Bensemmane, S., Ohana, M., ve Russo, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employees’ affective commitment: A multiple mediation model. Management Decision, 57 (1): 152-167.
• Brammer, S., A. Millington and Rayton, B. (2005). The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Organisational Commitment, Working Paper, University of Bath, UK.
• Brammer, S., and Millington, A. I. (2003) ‘The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement’, Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 213-226.
• Brammer, S., Millington, A. ve Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organisational commitment, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (10): 1701-1719.
• Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived External Prestige, Affective Commitment And Citizenship Behaviors, Organization Studies, 26 (3): 443-464.
• Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., ve Weisberg, J. (2006). Perceived External Prestige, Organizational Identification And Affective Commitment: A Stakeholder Approach, Corporate Reputation Review, 9 (1): 92-104.
• Carmeli, A., ve Freund, A. (2009). Linking Perceived External Prestige And Intentions To Leave The Organization: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction And Affective Commitment. Journal Of Social Service Research, 35:.236-250.
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, Academy Of Management Review, 4 (4): 497-505.
• Chaudhary, R. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: a study among indian business executives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-24.
• Closon, C., Leys, C., ve Hellemans, C. (2015). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 13(1), 31-54.
• De Roeck, K., El Akremi, A., & Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency matters! How and when does corporate social responsibility affect employees’ organizational identification?. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141-1168.
• De Roeck, K., ve Maon, F. (2018). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 609-625.
• Demirtaş, H. A. (2003). Sosyal kimlik kuramı, temel kavram ve varsayımlar. İletişim Araştırmaları, 1(1), 123-144.
• Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., ve Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (3): 507-533.
• Dutton, J. A., Dukerich, J. M., ve Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational Image And Member Identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (2): 239-263.
• Dutton, J. A., ve Dukerıch, J. M. (1991). Keeping An Eye On The Mirror: Image And Identity İn Organizational Adaption, Academy Of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.
• Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D., ve Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 563-580.
• Gao, Y., ve He, W. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and employee organizational citizenship behavior: the pivotal roles of ethical leadership and organizational justice. Management Decision, 55(2), 294-309.
• Gao, Y., Zhang, D., ve Huo, Y. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and work engagement: testing a moderated mediation model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(5), 661-673.
• Greening, D. W., and Turban, D. B. (2000) ‘Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality work force’ Business and Society, 39: 254-280.
• Gupta, N., ve Sharma, V. (2016). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee engagement and its linkage to organizational performance: A conceptual model. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 59.
• Hawkins, W. D. (1998). Predictions Of Affective Organizational Commitment Among High School Principals, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Virginia Polyhechnic Institute And State University Department Of Educational Leadership And Policy Studies, Virginia.
• Hofman, P. S., ve Newman, A. (2014). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(5), 631-652.
• Kim, J. S., Song, H. J., ve Lee, C. K. (2016). Effects of corporate social responsibility and internal marketing on organizational commitment and turnover intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 25-32.
• Lantos, G. P. (2001). The Boundaries Of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, The Journal Of Consumer Marketing, 18 (7): 595-649.
• Mael, F, ve Ashforth, B. E. 1992. Alumni And Their Alma: A Partial Test Of The Reformulated Model Of Organizational Identification, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 13 (2): 813-816.
• Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57-72.
• Maignan, I., Ferrell, O., ve Hult, M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455430.
• Maignan, I., ve Ferrell, O., (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument ‐ Concepts, evidence and research directions, European Journal of Marketing, 35 (3/4): 457-484.
• March, J. G., ve Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
• Mayer, R. G., ve Schoorman, F. D. (1998). Differentiating Antecedents of Organizational Commitment: A Test of March and Simon's Model, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 19 (1): 15-28.
• Mercer, J. J. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility And Its Importance To Consumers, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, The Claremont Graduate University.
• Meyer, J. P., ve Allen, N. J. (1991). A Three Component Conceptualization Of Organizational Commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1 (1): 61-89.
• Moorthy, M. K., Arokiasamy, L. ve Chelliah, T. D. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility: Awareness Level Among Undergraduates, Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research İn Business, Institute Of Interdisciplinary Business Research, 2 (2), 440-460.
• Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H., Waldman, D. A. ve Siegel, D. S. (2013). Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future. Personnel Psychology, 66, 805–24.
• Mowday, R. T., ve Steers, R. M. (1979). The Measurement Of Organizational Commitment, Journal Of Vocational Behavior, Vol.14 (2): 224-247.
• Nejati, M., ve Ghasemi, S. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment, Journal of Global Responsibility, 4 (2): 263-275.
• Newman, A., Nielsen, I., ve Miao, Q. (2015). The impact of employee perceptions of organizational corporate social responsibility practices on job performance and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from the Chinese private sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(9), 1226-1242.
• Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L. ve Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–41.
• Payne, A., Ballantyne, D. ve Christopher, M. (2005). A Stakeholder Approach To Relationship Marketing Strategy: The Development and Use Of The “Six Markets” Model, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7-8): 855-871.
• Peterson, D. K. (2004). The Relationship Between Perceptions Of Corporate Citizenship And Organizational Commitment, Business And Society, 43 (3): 296-319.
• Rashid, A., Gul, F., ve Khalid, G. K. (2018). Internal corporate social responsibility and intention to quit: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Business & Management, 13(1), 79-95.
• Riketta, M., ve Launderer, A. (2005). Does Perceived Threat To Organizational Status Moderate The Relation Between Organizational Commitment And Work Behavior, Journal Of Management, 22, 193-200.
• Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., ve Bill, J. B. (1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions And Implications For Managing Corporate Social Performance”, Journal Of Business Ethics, 16, 401–412.
• Rupp, D. E. and Mallory, D. (2015). ‘Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing’. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 211–36.
• Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Skarlicki, D. P., Paddock, E. L., Kim, T. Y., ve Nadisic, T. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39 (5): 559-579.
• Sharma, R., ve Sharma, M. (2011). Attitude Of The Youth Towards Corporate Social Responsibility İn India: A Study Of Jalandhar District, The Iup Journal Of Management Research, 10 (1), 7-27.
• Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., ve Van Riel, C.B.M. (2001). The Impact Of Employee Communication And Perceived External Prestige On Organizational Identification, Academy Of Management Journal, 44 (5): 1051–1062.
• Šulentić, S., Žnidar, K. ve Pavičić, J. (2017). The key determinants of Perceived External Prestige (PEP): Qualitative Research Approach, Management, 22 (1): 49-84.
• Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1985). ‘The Social Identity Theory of Group Behavior’, The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology içinde, H. Tajfel (ed.), (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 15–40.
• Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). ‘The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour’, Psychology of intergroup relations içinde, S. Austin and W. G. Austin (Eds.), 7-24, Chicago: NelsonHall.
• Turner, J. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blakcwell.
• Turner, J. C. (1985) ‘Social categorization and the self-concept: Social cognitive theory of group behavior’, Advances in group processes içinde, E. E. Lawler (Ed.), 77-122 Greenwich, CT: JAI.
• Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Türker, D. (2009). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment, Journal Of Business Ethics, 89: 189–204.
• Vakola, M., ve Nikolaou, I. (2005). Attitudes towards Organizational Change: What is the Role of Employees’ Stress and Commitment?, Employee Relations, 25 (2): 160–174.