ABD Güvenlik Politikasında Söylem ve Pratik

Devletlerin uluslararası ve iç siyasete ilişkin uygulamaları, tehditlerin ve fırsatların yönetilebilmesiyle yakından ilgilidir. Bu yüzden hem ulusal hem de uluslararası politikaların uygulanmasında etkili bir söyleme de ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, geride kalan yüzyılın güvenlik tarihinin önemli aktörlerinden Amerika Birleşik Devletleri de izlediği güvenlik siyasetinde bir dizi söylem ve pratik geliştirmiştir. Bu çerçevede, güvenlik söz konusu olduğunda Amerikan yaklaşımının hem yumuşak hem de sert söylemleri kullanageldiği; hatta savaşa varan müdahalelerden de çekinmediği dikkat çekmektedir.Bu çalışmada bir yandan Amerikan güvenlik yaklaşımının tarihsel gelişim seyri içinde ne tür bir değişim ve dönüşüme uğradığı incelenirken; öte yandan bu süreçte gerçekleşen söylem-eylem paralelliği de irdelenmektedir.

Discourse and Practice in American Security Policy

The practices of foreign and domestic politics carried out by countries are closely related with their capacities to conduct risks and to utilize opportunities. That is why an effective discourse is needed for managing international and domestic affairs. In this context, the United States as an important player in the history of the past century has also developed a series of discourse and practices. When it comes to security, American approach considerably engages in both soft and hard discourses, moreover, never hesitates to make an interference even if it causes to war. In this article, while it is analysed how American security approach transformed in the course of time, on one hand, the related discourse in this context is scrutinized on the other hand.

___

  • AFL, Post–cold War Policy – Isolating and punishing “rogue” states, http://www. americanforeignrelations.com/O-W/Post-cold-War-Policy-Isolating-andpunishing-rogue-states.html#ixzz2HZCRx9gC(Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2012)
  • Cassidy, Robert M., “Prophets or Praetorians? The Uptonian Paradox and the Powell Corollary”, Parameters, Autumn, 2003.
  • Çolakoğlu, Selçuk, ‘Asya-Pasifik’te Amerika: ABD’nin “Batı”ya Açılma Macerası, Doğu Batı Dergisi (Journal of Dogu Bati), Yıl:8, Sayı:32, 2005, ss.181-195.
  • Dayes, John H. and John B. Hattendorf (ed.), The Writings of Stephen B. Luce, (New Port Rhode Island: Naval War College Press, 1975)
  • Department of State, ‘Telegram, George Kennan to George Marshall [“LongTelegram”]’, February 22, 1946. Harry S. Truman Administration File, Elsey Papers. http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/coldwar/documents/pdf/6-6.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2013)
  • Divine, Robert A. (ed.), American Foreign Policy Since 1945, (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, Chicago, 1969).
  • Dunne, Michael, ‘Review Article The History and Historiography of American Diplomacy: Principles, Traditions and Values’, International Affairs, p:74, 1998. Gilpin, Robert, Uluslararası İlişkilerin Ekonomi Politiği, (Ankara: Kripto Yayınları, 2011)
  • Hamid, Shadi, ‘Authoritarian Reaction in Middle East Challenges American Policy’, Brooking Institute, 24.03.2011, http://www.brookings.edu/research/ expert-qa/2011/03/24-syria-hamid (Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2012)
  • Hart, Albert Bushnell, The Monroe Doctrine: An Interpretattion, (Boston: LittleBrown&Company, 1916)
  • Heywood, Andrew, Siyasi İdeolojiler, (Ankara: Adres Yayınları, , 2011)
  • Huntington, Samuel, Asker ve Devlet, çev: K. Uğur Kızılaslan, (İstanbul: Salyangoz Yayınları,, 2004)
  • Kagan, Robert, Dangerous Nation, (New York: Vintage, 2006)
  • Krauthammer, Charles, “The Bush Doctrine: ABM, Kyoto and the New American Unilateralism”, The Weekly Standard, Vol:6, No:36, 04.06.2001. http://www. weeklystandard.com/Content/Protected/Articles/000/000/000/474abspw. asp?nopager=1 (06.01.2012)
  • Krauthammer, Charles, “Charlie Gibson’s Gaffe”, The Washington Post, 13.09.2008. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/ AR2008091202457.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2012)
  • Lattimore, Owen, The Situation in Asia, (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1949) Lefebvre, Maxime, Amerikan Dış Politikası, çev: İsmail Yerguz, (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005)
  • Leonard Wood, Our Military History, (Chicago: The Reilly&Britton Co., 1916)
  • Lizza, Ryan, Leading From Behind, The New Yorker, 27.04.2011. http://www. newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2011/04/leading-from-behind-obamaclinton.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 19.09.2012)
  • Lydia R. Nussbaum, “From Paternalism to Imperialism: The U.S. and the BoxerRebellion”, http://www.arts.cornell.edu/knight_institute/publicationsprizes/discoveries/discoveriesfall2002/12lydianussbaum.pdf(Erişim Tarihi: 15.12.2012) Mahan, Alfred Thayer, The Interest of America in Sea Power, (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1917)
  • Marszalek, John F., Sherman A Soldier’s Passion for Order, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, , 2007)
  • Mearsheimer, John J., ‘E.H. Carr vs Idealism: The Battle Rages on’, International Relations vol:19 (2), June 2005.
  • Miles, Alex, “The Rise of the Rogue States Doctrine: The Clinton and Bush Approach to National Security in the Post-Cold War Era”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of Salford, 2009).
  • Minnerop, Petra, “Rogue States-States Sponsors of Terrorism?”, German Law Journal, http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=188 (Erişim Tarihi: 002012)
  • Nathan, James A. and James K. Oliver, Foreign Policy Making and the American Political System, (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1983) s:93.
  • Özdağ, Ümit, “Libya’yı Böldünüz Sıra Suriye’de Mi?”, http://www.21yyte.org/tr/ yazi6520-LIBYAYI_BOLDUNUZ_SIRA_SURIYEDE_MI.html (Erişim Tarihi: 002012)
  • Rice, Condoleezza, ‘Transformational Diplomacy’, (Georgetown University, Washington DC, Jan., 2006). http://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/59306. htm. (Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2013)
  • Richard L. Armitage and Joseph Nye, Jr, CSIS Commission on Smart Power, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, 2007. http://csis.org/files/ media/csis/pubs/071106_csissmartpowerreport.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.01.2013) Roy, Arundhati, ‘The Algebra of Infinite Justice’, http://www.guardian.co.uk/ world/2001/sep/29/september11.afghanistan, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2013)
  • Schuman, Frederick L., “John Hay”, Encyclodedia of the Social Sciences, vol:VII, MacMillan, 1930-1934.
  • Simon Rogers, ‘Natooperations in Libya: data journalism breaks down which country does what’, The Guardian, 31.10.2011, Smith, Adam, Milletlerin Zenginliği, (İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları, Çev:Haldun Derin, 2010), http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/may/22/natolibya-data-journalism-operations-country# (Erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2012)
  • Stocton, Alfred A., The Monroe Doctrine and Other Addresses, (Sanit John Canada:J&A McMillian, 1898)
  • Stratfor, ‘Military Options to Undermine Syria’s Regime’, http://www.stratfor.com/ analysis/military-options-undermine-syrias-regime (Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2012) Tapper, Jake, ‘Clinton, No Longer a Believer that Assad is a ‘Reformer,’ Says He Can’t Sustain the Armed Opposition in Syria’, ABC News, http://abcnews. go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/clinton-no-longer-a-believer-that-assad-is-areformer-says-he-cant-sustain-the-armed-opposition-in-syria/ (Erişim Tarihi: 02011)
  • The Executive Secretary on The United States Objectives and Programs for National Security April 14.04.1950 “A Report toThe National Security Counsil NSC 68”, 14.04.1950.
  • Thompson, Mark, “How Gaddafi Lost His Grip in Libya?,The Time”, 22.08.2011, http://nation.time.com/2011/08/22/how-gaddafi-lost-his-grip-on-libya/ (Erişim Tarihi: 27.09.2012)
  • U.S. Department of Defense, “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21 st Century Defense”, Washington, 2012.
  • Weber, Max, Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu, (Ankara:Ayraç Yayınevi, 2010 White House, ‘President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point’, (United States Military Academy, NY, June 2002), http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/06/print/20020601-3.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 002012)