İsmet GÖÇER, Osman PEKER

116100

YABANCI DOĞRUDAN YATIRIMLARIN VERİMLİLİK ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE, ÇİN VE HİNDİSTAN ÖRNEKLEMİNDE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ÇOKLU YAPISAL KIRILMALI EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ

Bu çalışmada, Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımların (YDY), ülkelerin Toplam Faktör Verimlilikleri (TFV) üzerindeki etkileri, Türkiye, Çin ve Hindistan için, Carrion-i-Silvestre vd. (2009) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testi, Maki (2012) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme testi ve dinamik en küçük kareler yöntemi yardımıyla, 1980-2011 dönemi verileriyle analiz edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgulara göre; serilerin düzey değerlerinde durağan olmadığı ve seriler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin varolduğu görülmüştür. Uzun dönem analizi sonucunda; YDY’deki %10’luk artışın TFV’yi Türkiye’de % 0,3; Çin’de % 0,4 ve Hindistan’da % 0,2 oranında arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. 
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımlar, Toplam Faktör Verimliliği, Çoklu Yapısal Kırılmalı Zaman Serisi Analizi

PRODUCTIVITY EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: A COMPARATIVE COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS WITH MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN TURKEY, CHINA AND INDIA SAMPLE

In this study effects of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on countries’ Total Factor Productivity (TFP), are analyzed with the help of ‘multiple structural breaks unit root test of Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009)’, ‘multiple structural breaks cointegration test of Maki (2012)’ and ‘dynamic ordinary least square method’ for Turkey, China and India by using 1980-2011 period data. According to the empirical findings, series are non-stationary in level and it is observed that there is cointegration relationship between series. As a result of the long run analysis; 10% increase in FDI leads to 0,3 % increase in Turkey; 0,4 % increase in China and 0,2 % increase in India with respect to TFP. 
Keywords:

Foreign Direct Investment, Total Factor Productivity, Time Series Analysis with Multiple Structural Breaks,

PDF

___

  • • ALTENBURG, T., (2000), Linkages and Spillovers between Transnational Corporations and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Countries: Opportunities and Best Policies, In UNCTAD, ed., TNC-SME Linkages for Development: Issues-Experiences- Best Practices. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
  • • ARNOLD, J. ve JAVORCIK, B. S., (2007), “Does Services Liberalization Benefit Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic”, Work Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4109.
  • • ARNOLD, J. ve JAVORCIK, B. S., (2009), “Gifted Kids or Pushy Parents? ForeignAcquisitions and Firm Performance in Indonesia”, Journal of International Economics, c. 79, s. 1, ss. 42-53.
  • • AUDET, K. M. ve GAGNÉ, R., (2010), “Openess to Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity in Canada”, Productivity and Prosperity In Quebec, ss. 1-19.
  • • BAI, J., PERRON, P., (2003), “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, s. 18, ss. 1-22.
  • • BARRELL, R ve PAIN, N., (1997), “Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change and Economic Growth Within Europe”, Te Economic Journal, c. 107, s. 445, ss. 1770-1786.
  • • BAY, M., SEYMEN OSKAY, C. ve Çiçek, E., (2007), “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımları Türkiye’ye Çekmek İçin Yapılması Gereken Düzenlemeler”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ. İ. B. F. Dergisi, c. 12, s. 9, ss. 253-263.
  • • BLALOCK, G. ve GERTLER, P. J., (2008), “Welfare Gains from Foreign Direct Investment Through Technology Transfer to Local Suppliers”, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, c. 74, s. 2, ss. 402-421.
  • • BLOMSTRÖM, M. ve WOLFF, E. N., (1989), “Multinational Corporations And Productivity Convergence In Mexico”, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, Working Papers, ss. 89-28, New York University.
  • • BLOMSTRÖM, M. ve KOKKO, A., (2003), “Human Capital and Inward FDI”, The European Institute of Japanese Studies, Working Paper Series, No. 167.
  • • BORENSZTEIN, E., GREGORIA, J. D. ve Lee, J. W., (1998), “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Afect Economic Growth?”, Journal of International Economics, c. 45, s.1, ss. 115-138.
  • • BOSWORTH, B. P. ve COLLINS, S. M., (2003), “The Empirics of Growth: An Update”, Brookins Papers on Economic Activity, c.2, s. 115.
  • • BOZKURT, H. ve DURSUN, G., (2006), “Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri ile Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırım Akımları Arasındaki Etkileşim: Türkiye İçin Kointegrasyon Analizi, 1980-2004”, Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, s. 2, ss. 37-49.
  • • CARRION-I-SILVESTRE, J. L., KIM, D ve PERRON, P., (2009), “GLS-Based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks Under Both the Null and the Alternative Hypotheses”, Econometric Theory, s. 25, ss. 1754-1792.
  • • CHAKRABORTY, C. ve NUNNENKAMP, P., (2006), “Economic Reforms, Foreign Direct Investment and its Economic Effects in India”, Kiel Working Paper, No. 1272.
  • • ÇEŞTEPE, H. ve TÜYLÜOĞLU, Ş., (2006), “Yabancı Yaptırımlar Yoluyla Teknoloji Transferi: İrlanda Örneğinden Türkiye İçin Dersler”, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 61, s. 2, ss. 45-62.
  • • ÇİN ÜLKE RAPORU, (2008), Pekin Büyükelçiliği, Ticaret Müşavirliği.
  • • DAVIES, K., (2003), “Attracting Investment to China”, OECD Policy Brief.
  • • DEİK, (2003), Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti Ekonomisi ve Türkiye ile İlişkileri, http://www.deik.org.tr, [Erişim Tarihi: 09.10.2011].
  • • DEİK, (2004), DTÖ Üyeliği Sonrası Çin Halk Cumhuriyetinin Ekonomisi ve Ticaretinde Gelişmeler, http://www.deik.org.tr, [Erişim Tarihi: 09.10.2011].
  • • DEİK, (2009), Yükselişi Anlamak, http://www.deik.org.tr, [Erişim Tarihi: 09.10.2011].
  • • DELOITTE, (2011), Türkiye Otomotiv Sektörü Raporu.
  • • DEMİRDÜZEN, Z., (2010), “Yeni Delhi Ticaret Müşavirliği TUSİAD Sunumu”, http://www.tusiad.org/rsc/shared/file/ZiyaDemirduzen.pdf, [Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2011].
  • • DENG, Z., FALVEY, R. ve BLAKE, A., (2012), “Trading Market Access for Technology? Tax Incentives, Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Spillovers in China”, Journal of Policy Modeling, s. 34, ss. 675–690.
  • • DPT, (2000), Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Özel İhtisas Kurulu Raporu, Ankara.
  • • ENDERS, W., (1995), Applied Econometric Time Series, 1 st Edition, Wiley, New York.
  • • ENDERS, W., (1996), Rats Handbook for Econometric Time Series, JohnWilley and Song Inc.
  • • ESTEVE, V. ve REQUENA, F., (2006) ,“A Cointegration Analysis of Car Advertising and Sales Data in the Presenceof Structural Change”, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, c. 13, s. 1, ss. 111-128.
  • • GBOYEGA, A. O., (2003), Concept and Measurement of Productivity, University of Ibadan, No. 19.
  • • GLASS, A. ve SAGGI, K., (2002), “Multinational Firms and Technology Transfer”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, c. 104, s. 4, ss. 495–514.
  • • GÖÇER, İ., BULUT, Ş. ve DAM, M. M., (2012), “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Turkiye’nin İhracat Performansına Etkileri: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Business and Economics Research Journalc. 3, s. 2, ss. 21-40.
  • • GREGORY, A. W. ve HANSEN, B. E., (1996), “Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models With Regime Shifts”, Journal of Econometrics, c.70, s. 1, ss. 99-126.
  • • GUJARATI, D, N., (1999), Basic Econometrics, Mc Graw Hill, Literatür Yayıncılık, 3rd Edition, İstanbul.
  • • HAAKER, M., (1999), “Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment Through Labour Turnover: The Supply of Management Skills”, Discussion Paper, London School of Economics.
  • • HALE, G. ve LONG, C., (2007), “Are there Productivity Spillovers from Foreign DirectInvestment in China?”, Pacific Basin, Working Paper, No. 13.
  • • HASASKEL, J. E., PEREIRA, S. C. ve Slaughter, M. J., (2002), “Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms?”, Working Paper, No. 8724.
  • • HATEMI-J, A., (2008), “Tests For Cointegration With Two Unknown Regime Shifts With an Application to Financial Market Integration”, Empirical Economics, s. 35, ss. 497-505.
  • • HİNDİSTAN RAPORU, (2012), Yeni Delhi Büyükelçiliği, Ticaret Müşavirliği, Mayıs.
  • • JABBOUR, L. ve MUCCHIELLI, J. L., (2004), “Technology Transfer through Backward Linkages: The Case of the Spanish Manufacturing Industry”, ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/cahiers2004/Bla04073.pdf, [Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2012].
  • • JAYARAMAN, T. K., (1998), “Foreign Direct Investment as An Alternative to Foreign Aid to South Pacific Island Countries”, Journal of the South Pacific Society, c. 21, s. 3, ss. 29-44.
  • • JAVORCIK, B. S., (2004), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages”, The American Economic Review, c. 94, s. 3, ss. 605-627.
  • • JAVORCIK, B. S. ve SPATAREANU, M., (2005), “Do Foreign Investors Care about Labor Market Regulations?”, Review of World Economics, Springer, c. 141, s. 3, ss. 375-403.
  • • İSO, (2002), Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımlar ve Türkiye Durum Tespiti ve Stratejik Plan, İstanbul Sanayi Odası Yayınları, No. 1, ISBN: 975-512-610-4.
  • • KAMACI, A. M., (2009), “Makedonya Cumhuriyeti'nde Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımlar ve İş Ortamı”, Prof. Dr. Angelova BILJANA, 2. Uluslararası Balkan Kongresi, ss. 329-333.
  • • KATHURIA, S., (1996), Competing Through Technology and Manufacturing: A Study of the Indian Commercial Vehicles Industry, Oxford University Press.
  • • KAYMAK, H., (2005), “Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımları Artırmak İçin Teşvikler Gerekli ve/veya Yeterli mi?”, Maliye Dergisi, s. 149, ss. 74-104.
  • • KEPENEK, Y. ve YENTÜRK, N., (2003), Türkiye Ekonomisi, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • • KIM, J. D. ve HWANG, S. I., (2000), “The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Koreaâ’s Economic Development: Productivity Effects and Implications for the Currency Crisis”, NBER-EASE, s. 9, ss. 267-294.
  • • KÖYMEN, S. ve SAYEK, S., (2010), “The Role of Human Capital InProductivity Spillovers from FDI: An Empirical Analysis on Turkish Manufacturing Firms”, Bilkent University, Discussion Papers, No. 03.
  • • KTO, (2008), Hindistan Cumhuriyeti Ülke Raporu, Konya Ticaret Odası, Etüd-Araştırma Servisi, Mart.
  • • LEE, J. ve STRAZICICH, M.C., (2003), “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test With Two Structural Breaks”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, c. 85, s. 4, ss. 1082-1089.
  • • LEMI, A., (2002), Foreign Direct Investment In Developing Countries: Uncertainty, Trade and Welfare, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Western Michigan University.
  • • LESHER, M. ve MIROUDOT, S., (2008), “Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers and Their Interrelationships with Trade”, OECD Investment Policy Perspectives.
  • • LIPSEY, R. E., (1999), “Foreign Production by U.S. Firms and Parent Firm Employment”, NBER, Working Papers, No. 7357.
  • • LIPSEY, R. E., (2002), “Home and Host Country Effects of FDI”, NBER, Working Paper, No. 9293.
  • • LUMSDAINE, R. L. ve PAPELL, D. H., (1997), “Multiple Trend Breaks and The Unit Root Hypothesis”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, s. 79, ss. 212-218.
  • • MAKI, D. (2012) “Tests For Cointegration Allowing For an Unknown Number of Breaks”, Economic Modelling, c. 29, s. 5, ss. 2011-2015.
  • • NG, S. ve PERRON, P., (2001), “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power”, Econometrica, s. 69, ss. 1519-1554.
  • • OECD, (1999), Science, Technology and Industry Scorebroad 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Paris.
  • • ÖZSOYLU, A. F. ve ALGAN, N., (2011), Dünya Ekonomisinin Yeni Aktörleri BRIC, 1. Baskı, Karahan Yayınları, No. 130, Adana.
  • • PAPAIOANNOU, S. K., (2004), “FDI and ICT Innovation Effects on Productivity Growth: A Comparison between Developing and Developed Countries”, http://www.fep.up.pt /conferences/earie2005/cdrom/Session%20II/II.D/papaioannou.pdf, [Erişim Tarihi: 22.10.2011].
  • • PEKER, O. ve GÖÇER, İ., (2010), “Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımların Türkiye’deki İşsizliğe Etkisi: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”, Ege Akademik Bakış, c. 10, s. 4, ss. 1187-1194.
  • • PERRON, P., (1989), The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, c. 57, s. 2, ss. 1361-1401.
  • • PERRON, P., (1997), “Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Veriables”, Journal of Econometrics, s. 80, ss. 355-385.
  • • PRASANNA, N., (2010), “Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Export Performance in India”, J Soc Sci, c. 24, s. 1, ss. 65-71.
  • • RUANE, F. ve UGUR, A., (2005), “Foreign Direct Investment And Productivity Spillovers in Irish Manufacturing Industry: Evidence From Plant Level Panel Data”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, c. 12, s. 1, ss. 53-66.
  • • SALIM, R., (2013), “Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers and Technical Efficiency in the Indonesian Pharmaceutical Sector: Firm Level Evidence”, Applied Economics, c. 45, s. 3, ss. 383-395.
  • • SASIDHARAN, S. ve RAMANATHAN, A., (2007), “Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing”, International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, c. 1, s. 1, ss. 5-22.
  • • SAYGILI, Ş., (2003), Bilgi Ekonomisine Geçiş Sürecinde Türkiye Ekonomisinin Dünyadaki Konumu, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, No. 2675.
  • • SCHOORS, K. ve VAN DER TOL, B., (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers Within and Between Sectors: Evidence From Hungarian Data”, Ghent University Working Paper, No. 157.
  • • SMARZYNSKA, B. K., (2002), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms?”, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2923.
  • • SOLOW, R., (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, QuarterlyJournal of Economics, c. 70, s. 1 ss. 65-94.
  • • SOYSAL, H., (2007), Türkiye'de Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Verimlilik Analizi Otomotiv Sektörü Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • • STOCK, J. ve WATSON, M. W., (1993), “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems”, Econometrica, c. 61, s. 4, ss. 783-820.
  • • SUN, H. (1996) “Direct Foreign Investment and Linkage Efects: The Experience of China”, Asian Economies, c. 25, s. 1, ss. 5-28.
  • • SUN, H., (1998), “Macroeconomic Impact of Direct Foreign Investment in China: 1979-1996”, The World Economy, c. 21, s. 5, ss. 675-694.
  • • TANNA, S., (2009), “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Total Factor Productivity growth: International Evidence from the Banking Industry”, Managerial Finance, c. 35, s. 3, ss. 297-311.
  • • TAYMAZ, E. ve YILMAZ, K., (2008), “Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Spillovers”, Workshop on Labour Markets, Trade and FDI, http://www.tepav.org.tr/tur /admin/ dosyabul/upload/DN_kriz_sermaye_akimlari.pdf,Trade Policy Review, [Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2011].
  • • TAYMAZ, E., VOYVODA, E. ve YILMAZ, K., (2008), “Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinde Yapısal Dönüşüm, Üretkenlik ve Teknolojik Değişme Dinamikleri”, ERC Working Papers in Economics, No. 4.
  • • TÜBİTAK, (2011), Ulusal Yenilik Sistemi 2023 Yılı Hedefleri, Http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/ tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/BTYK/btyk23/2011_101.pdf, [Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2012].
  • • UNCTAD, (1998), World Investment Report 1997, Transnational Corporations Market Structure and Competition Policy, New York.
  • • UYANIK, T., (2011), Hindistan Ülke Raporu, Dış Ticaret Müsteşarlığı İhracatı Geliştirme Etüd Merkezi.
  • • ÜNSAR, S., (2007), “Yabancı İşletmelerde Üretim Stratejileri”, Journal of Yasar University, c. 2, s. 7, ss. 695-708.
  • • WANG, Y., (2010), “FDI and Productivity Growth: The Role of Vertical Linkages”, Canadian Journal of Economics, c. 43, s. 4, ss. 1243-1272.
  • • WEI, W., (2005), “China and India: Any difference in their FDI performances?”, Journal of Asian Economics, s. 16, ss. 719-736.
  • • WESTERLUND, J. ve EDGERTON, D., (2006), “Simple Tests for Cointegration in Dependent Panels with Structural Breaks”, Lund University, Department of Economics, Working Papers, No. 13.
  • • WOODWARD, D., (2001), The Next Crisis? Direct and Equity Investment in Developing Countries, Diane Pub Co Press, New York.
  • • WORLD BANK, (2012), World Developing Indicator (WDI), http://data.worldbank.org /data-catalog/world-development-indicators, [Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2012].
  • • YILMAZ, R. ve KOYUNCU, C., (2005), Çin: Dragon Ekonomisinin Önlenemeyen Yükselişi, Ekin Kitabevi, ISBN: 975-8768-48-4, Bursa.
  • • ZHANG, K. H., (2005), “How Does FDI Affect a Host Country’s Export Performance? The Case of China”, International Conference of WTO, China and the Asian Economies, III. Xi’an, 25-26 June, China.
  • • ZHOU, Y., (2008), “The R&D Spillovers Study of Foreign Direct Investmentin Chinese Manufacturing Sector”, 2008 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (15th,) September 10-12, 2008 Long Beach, USA.
  • • ZHU, G., ve TAN, K. Y., (2000), “Foreign Direct Investment and Labor Productivity: New Evidence From China As The Host”, Thunderbird International Business Review, c. 42, s.5.
  • • ZIVOT, E. ve ANDREWS, D., (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business Economic Statistics, c. 10, s. 3, ss. 251-270.
Verimlilik Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1013-1388
  • Başlangıç: 2004
  • Yayıncı: T.C. SANAYİ VE TEKNOLOJİ BAKANLIĞI STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR VE VERİMLİLİK GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

HASTANE ÇALIŞANLARININ KURUM İÇİ POLİTİK DAVRANIŞLAR VE ETİK İKLİM ALGILAMALARI

Elif Yardan, Nurcan Us

HİSSE SENEDİ FİYAT VERİMLİLİĞİNİN MARKOV ZİNCİRLERİ İLE ANALİZİ BIST TEKNOLOJİ ENDEKSİ HİSSE SENEDİ FİYATLARI ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Aslı Özdemir, Erhan Demireli

YABANCI DOĞRUDAN YATIRIMLARIN VERİMLİLİK ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE, ÇİN VE HİNDİSTAN ÖRNEKLEMİNDE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ÇOKLU YAPISAL KIRILMALI EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ

İsmet GÖÇER, Osman PEKER

FARKLI YÖNTEMLER İLE TÜRK KONTEYNER LİMANLARININ VERİMLİLİĞİ

Alpaslan ATEŞ, Soner ESMER

TÜRKİYE’DE AKDENİZ BÖLGESİ’NDE LOJİSTİK MERKEZ YERİ SEÇİMİ İÇİN BULANIK SERİM TEORİ VE MATRİS YAKLAŞIMI UYGULAMASI

Fahriye UYSAL, Mustafa GÜLMEZ