BİLGİ VE İLETİŞİM TEKNOLOJİLERİNİN VERİMLİLİK ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Yaklaşık 20 yıl önce dijitalleşme ile birlikte bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin yoğun kullanımı ekonomik refahı ve uzun vadeli sürdürülebilir verimlilik artışını desteklemektedir. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri (BİT) sayesinde bilgi akışı ve piyasa sınırları genişlemekte, maliyetler azalmakta ve ekonomik büyüme sağlanmaktadır. Diğer bir söylemle, sınırlı bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri altyapısına sahip olan ülkelerde maliyetler daha yüksek, bilgi akışı daha az, pazar fırsatları daha kısıtlı olmakta ve dolayısıyla daha düşük gelir elde edilmesi gibi çeşitli ekonomik sorunlarla karşı karşıya kalınmaktadır. Bu yüzden, son yıllarda bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri hem akademisyenler hem de politika uygulayıcıları tarafından dikkat çeken bir konu haline gelmektedir. Son on yılda, bilgisayar, e-mail, internet kullanımı gibi bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri araçları, yeniliği, büyümeyi ve sosyal değişimi teşvik eden en önemli araçlardır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmanın amacı, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin verimlilik üzerine olan etkisinin Türkiye için ortaya konulmasıdır. Uygulama sonucunda, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri ile verimlilik arasında literatüre uyumlu olarak uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin var olduğu kanıtlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri, Verimlilik, ARDL

THE IMPACT OF THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ON PRODUCTIVITY: CASE OF TURKEY

The emergence and intensive utilization of information and communication technologies (ICTs), which spawned the beginning of the digitization two decades ago, brought economic prosperity and sustained long-term productivity growth. The spread of ICT generates economic growth because it leads to reduction in interaction costs, expansion of information flows and market boundaries. In other words, countries with limited ICT infrastructure encounter several economic problems such as limited information flows, overpriced cost of interaction, reduced market opportunities and thus low incomes. Therefore, technological developments have generated considerable interest among academics and practitioners in recent years. In recent decades, information and communication technologies, as computers, e-mail, internet and their applications have become the major drivers of innovation, growth and social change. This study aims to provide a country study of Turkey with respect to the impact of ICT on the productivity. At the end of the study, long- term significant statistical relationship is found between information and communication technology and productivity in accordance with the literature.

Keywords:

Information and Communication Technologies, Productivity, ARDL,

PDF

___

• BLACK, S. E. ve LYNCH, L. M., (2001), How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (3), 434-445.
• BROWN, R. L., DURBIN, J. ve EVANS, J. M., (1975), Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over Time, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 149-192.
• BRYJOLFSSON, E. ve HITT, L., (1998), Beyond the Productivity Paradox: Computers are the Catalyst for Bigger Changes, Communicaction of the Acm, Vol. 41, No. 8, Pp. 49–55.
• CARDONA, M., KRETSCHMER, T. ve STROBEL, T., (2013), ICT and Productivity: Conclusions From the Empirical Literature, Information Economics and Policy, 25 (3), 109- 125.
• COLECCHIA, A. ve SCHREYER, P., (2002), ICT Investment and Economic Growth in the 1990s: Is the United States a Unique Case? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Countries, Review Of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 5, No. 2, Pp. 408-442.
• ENGLE, R. F. ve GRANGER, C. W., (1987), Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
• FOX, S., (2006), "IT Stats, IT Salaries", Infoworld 28 (24), 6.
• GUST, C. ve MARQUEZ, J., (2004), International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: The Role of Information Technology and Regulatory Practices, Labour Economics, 11 (1), 33-58.
• INKLAAR, R., TIMMER, M. P. ve VAN ARK, B., (2008), Market Services Productivity Across Europe and the US, Economic Policy, 23 (53), 140-194.
• JONA LASINIO, C., IOMMI, M. ve MANZOCCHI, S., (2010), Intangible capital and productivity growth in European Countries, Available at SSRN 169198.
• JORGENSON, D. ve STIROH, K., (2000), Raising the Speed Limit: US Economic Growth in the Information Age, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity N 1.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• JORGENSON, D. W. ve GRILICHES Z., (1967), The Explanation of Productivity Change, The Review of Economic Studies, 249-283.
• JORGENSON, D. W., (1966), The Embodiment Hypothesis, The Journal of Political Economy, 1-17.
• MIRIBEL, F. G., (2001), Impacts of Information Technology on Labor Productivity: A Regional Panel Analysis of the United States, 1977-1997 (Doctoral Dissertation, Lyon 2).
• OECD, (2001), Measuring Productivity: Measurement of Aggregate and Industry- Level Productivity Growth: OECD Manual, Organisation for Economic Co- Operation and Development.
• OLINER, S. D. ve SICHEL, D. E., (2000), The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (4), 3- 22.
• OULTON, N., (2001), ICT and Productivity Growth in the United Kingdom, Senior Economist, Structural Economic Analysis Division, Bank of England, London, 2001, S.7
• PESARAN, M. H., SHIN Y. ve SMITH, R. J., (2001), Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289- 326.
• SAMIMI, A. J. ve ARAB M., (2011), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) & Total Factor Productivity (TFP): Evidence from Selected Countries of the World. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 10 (6), 768-776.
• SPIEZIA, V., (2011), Are ICT Users More Innovative?, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2011 (1), 1-21.
• STEINDEL, C. ve STIROH, K. J., (2001), Productivity Growth: What is it and Why do We Care About it?, Business Economics, 36 (4), 13-31.
• TIMMER, M. P. ve VAN ARK, B., (2005), Does Information and Communication Technology Drive EU-US Productivity Growth Differentials?, Oxford Economic Papers, 57 (4), 693-716.
• VAN ARK, B., MELKA, J., MULDER, N., TIMMER M. ve YPMA, G., (2002), “ICT Investment and Growth Accounts for the European Union, 1980-2000”, Paper Prepared for DG ECFIN, European Commission, Brussels, September.
• VELİ, A. K. E. L. ve GAZEL, S., (2014), Döviz Kurları İle BIST Sanayi Endeksi Arasındaki Eşbütünleşme İlişkisi: Bir ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (44), 23-41.
• WYCKOFF, A. W., (1995), The Impact of Computer Prices on International Comparison of Productivity, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 3, Nos 3-4, Pp. 277-293.