KARANLIK ÜÇLÜ’NÜN (NARSİSİZM, MAKYAVELİZM VE PSİKOPATİ) İŞ TATMİNİNE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz Bu çalışmada, Karanlık Üçlü’nün (subklinik narsisizm, Makyavelizm ve subklinik psikopati) iş tatminine etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada veriler, İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren iki ayrı özel sigorta şirketi çalışanlarının katılımı ile elde edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda toplamda 204 adet geçerli anket formu elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, narsisizm, Makyavelizm ve psikopati iş tatmini ile negatif ve anlamlı bir şekilde ilişkilenmiştir. Makyavelizm ve psikopatiye kıyasla, narsisizm iş tatmini ile daha zayıf düzeyde ilişkilenmiştir. Çoklu regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre, sadece psikopati iş tatminini negatif yönde etkilemiştir. Bulgular tartışma bölümünde incelenmiş ve birtakım araştırma önerileri ileri sürülmüştür. 

___

  • Alsahlawi, M. (2013). Measuring Energy efficiency in GCC Countries Using Data Envelopment Analysis. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 12, 15-30. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f2e8/c9e23e72d5d9cedf681a84ff72b3cba01a21.pdf.
  • Caves, D.W., Christensen L.R., Diwert, W.E. (1982). The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity. Econometrica,50,1394-1414. http://www.aae.wisc.edu/aae741/Ref/Caves%20Econometrica%201982.pdf
  • Chang, T., Hu, J. (2010). Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: An empirical study of China. Applied Energy, 87, 3262-3270. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.026.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. https://www.utdallas.edu/~ryoung/phdseminar/CCR1978.pdf
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Seiford, L.M. (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Boston, Kluwer.
  • Chien, T., Hu, J. L. (2007). Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and nonOECD economies. Energy Policy, 35, 3606-3615. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.033.
  • Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., Battase, G.E. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston, Kluwer..
  • Coelli, T.J. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Papers, 96/08, Australia. http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~econ380/DEAP.PDF.
  • Deliktas, E., Balcilar, M. (2005). A Comparative analysis of Productivity Growth, Catch-up and Convergence in Transition Economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41-1, 6-28.
  • El-Mahgary, S., Lahdelma, R. (1995). Data Envelopment Analysis: Visualizing the Results. EJOR, 83-3, 700-710. doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00303-T.
  • Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tsdec360 Färe, R.S.G., Norris, M., Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Changes in Industrial Countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66-83. http://www.iadb.org/res/files/dev2010/1994_productivity.pdf.
  • Farrel, M. J. (1957). The measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120-3, 253-82. DOI: 10.12691/ajer-2-1-2
  • Fhilippini, M., Hunt, L.C. (2010). Energy Demand and energy Efficiency in the OECD Countries: A Stochastic Demand Frontier Approach. Surrey Energy Economics Discussion Paper Series, 127, 1-30. http://www.seec.surrey.ac.uk/research/SEEDS/SEEDS127.pdf.
  • Groningen Growth and Development Centre, Penn World Table 8.1. Honma, S., Hu, J. L. (2008). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy, 36-2, 821-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.026.
  • International Energy Agency (2016), World Energy Outlook 2016 Karadag, M., Deliktas, E., Onder, A.O. (2005). Growth of Factor Productivity in the Turkish Manufacturing Industries at Provincal Level. Regional Studies, 39-2, 213-223. DOI: 10.1080/003434005200060007
  • Milan, J.A., Aldaz, N. (2004). Efficiency and Technical Change in Intertemporal Intersectoral DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 7-23, 2004.
  • Nishimizu, M., Page, J.M. (1982). Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions on Productivity Change in Yugoslavia 1965-78.
  • Economic Journal, 368, 920-936. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2232675.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Aed933b821966de7139 be485be922c846.
  • OECD (2011), OECD Green Growth Studies: Energy, OECD Publishing.
  • Seiford, L.M. (1996). Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978 1995), Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99-138. DOI: 10.1007/BF00157037
  • Singh, S., Coelli, T., Fleming, E. (2001). Performance of Dairy Plants in the Cooperative and Private Sectors in India. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 72-4, 453-479. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8292.00178/pdf
  • Song, M., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA Analysis of BRICS' Energy Efficiency Based on Small Sample Data. Applied Energy, 1049-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.064.
  • World Bank (2013). World Development Indicators. Zhang, X.P., Cheng, X.M., Yuan, J.H., Gao, X.J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing Countries. Energy Policy, 39, 644-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.037.
  • Zhou, P., Ang, B.W. (2008). Linear Programming Models for Measuring Economy Wide Energy Efficiency Performance. Energy Policy, 36-8, 2911-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.041
Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-0064
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi