Sanal Marka Topluluklarında Topluluk Üyelerinin Marka İle Özdeşleşme Düzeylerinin Öncülleri ve Sonuçları: Yapısal Bir Model Önerisi

Günümüzde web tabanlı teknolojilerin yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte, firmaların, müşterileriyle doğrudan ilişkiler kurabilmek ve müşteri-marka ilişkilerini geliştirebilmek ve sağlamlaştırabilmek amacıyla sanal marka topluluklarının kullanımı oldukça yaygınlaşmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı, sanal marka topluluklarında topluluk üyelerinin sosyal var olma ve sosyal kimlik edinme düzeylerinin, marka özdeşleşme, topluluk markasına bağlılık ve markaya ilişkin davranışlara etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu doğrultuda, Altay “19on4 Lisanslı Ürünler Mağazaları” sanal marka topluluğunda, alan araştırması metodolojisi uygulanmış ve yapısal bir model geliştirilmiştir. Bu topluluğun seçilmesinin nedeni, üyelerinin sürekli olarak iletişim halinde oldukları, ortak faaliyetlerde bulundukları, ortak değerlere ve amaçlara sahip olduklarının saptanmış olmasıdır. Model, söz konusu toplulukta sosyal var olma ve sosyal kimlik boyutlarının hepsinin aynı oranda hissedilemediğini ve bu boyutların marka özdeşleşme, marka topluluğuna bağlılık ve markaya ilişkin davranışlara farklı etkilerinin olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, söz konusu sanal marka topluluğunun ve uygulamalarının geliştirilmesi gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır

Sanal Marka Topluluklarında Topluluk Üyelerinin Marka İle Özdeşleşme Düzeylerinin Öncülleri ve Sonuçları: Yapısal Bir Model Önerisi

___

  • AKARSANAL, E. (2010), “ Toplulukların Bir Türü Olarak Sosyal Ağ Siteleri – Bir Pazarlama İletişimi Kanalı Olarak İşleyişi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (1), 107-122.
  • ALGESHEİMER, R., Dholakia, U. M., ve Herrmann, A. (2005), “The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence From European Car Clubs”, Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 19–34.
  • ASHFORTH, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20-39.
  • BAGOZZI, R. P., ve Dholakia, U. D. (2006), “Antecedents and Purchase Consequences of Customer Participation in Small Group Brand Communities”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (1), 45–61.
  • BAUER, H. H., Sauer, N. E. ve Schmitt, P. (2005), “Customer-Based Brand Equity in the Team Sport İndustry: Operationalization and The Impact on the Economic Success of Sports Teams”, European Journal of Marketing. 39 (5/6), 496-513.
  • BELK, R. ve Tumbat, G. (2005), “The Cult of Macintosh”, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8 (3), 205-217.
  • BHATTACHARYA, C. B. ve Sen, S. (2003), “Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies”, Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 76–88.
  • BIOCCA, F. (1997), “The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3 (2)
  • BIOCCA, F., Harms, C. ve Burgoon, J. K. (2003), “Towards A More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence:Review and Suggested Criteria”, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12 (5), 1-62.
  • BIOCCA, F., Harms, C., ve Gregg, J. (2001), “The Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence: Pilot Test of the Factor Structure And Concurrent Validity”, Paper presented at the Presence, May 21–23, Philadelphia.
  • BRISTOW, D. N. ve Sebastian, R. J. (2001), “Holy Cow! Wait ‘Til Next Year! a Closer Look at the Brand Loyalty of Chicago Cubs Baseball Fans”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (3), 256-275.
  • BRODY, M. K. (1979), “Institutionalized Sport as Quasi-Religion: Preliminary Considerations”, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 3 (2), 17-27.
  • CAMERON J. E. (2004), ”A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity”, Self and Identity, 3 (3), 239-262.
  • CARLSON, B. D.,. Suter, T. A. ve Brown, T. J. (2008), “Social Versus Psychological Brand Community: The Role of Psychological Sense of Brand Community”, Journal of Business Research, 61 (4), 284-291.
  • COUVELAERE, V. ve Richelieu, A. (2005), “Brand Strategy in Professional Sports: The Case of French Soccer Teams”, European Sport Management Quarterly, 5 (1), 23-46.
  • COVA, B. ve Pace, S. (2006), “Brand Community of Convenience Products: New Forms of Customers Empowerment - The Case “My Nutella Community”, European Journal of Marketing, 40 (9/10), 1087-1105.
  • DEDEOGLU, A. O. ve Ustundagli, E. (2011), “Sanal Topluluklar Bağlamında Tüketicilerin Tüketim, Yasam Tarzı ve Kimlik Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi, Business and Economics Research Journal, 2 (2), 23-40.
  • DHOLAKİA, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P. ve Pearo, L. K. (2004), “A Social İnfluence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 241-263.
  • ELLEMERS, N., Kortekaas, P., ve Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999), “Self-Categorisation, Commitment to the Group And Group Self-Esteem as Related But Distinct Aspects of Social İdentity”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29 (2-3), 371 – 389.
  • ERICKSON, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W.A., Laff, M. ve Wolf, T. (2002), “Social Translucence: Designing Social İnfrastructures That Make Collective Activity Visible”, Communications of the ACM, 45 (4), 40-44.
  • FISHER, R. J. ve Wakefield, K. (1998), “Factors Leading to Group Identification: A Field Study of Winners And Losers”, Psychology and Marketing, 15 (1), 23-40.
  • FULLERTON, G. (2005), “The Impact of Brand Commitment on Loyalty to Retail Service Brands”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22 (2), 97-110.
  • HACKMAN, M. Z. ve Walker, K. B. (1990), “Instructional Communication in the Televised Classroom: The Effects of System Design and Teacher İmmediacy on Student Learning and Satisfaction”, Communication Education, 39 (3), 196–206.
  • HANNUM, K. M. (2007), Social Identity: Knowing Yourself, Leading Others. North Carolina: Center for Creative Leadership Press.
  • HE, H., Li, Y. ve Harris, L. (2011), “Social Identity Perspective on Brand Loyalty”, Journal of Business Research, 65 (5), 648-657.
  • HINKLE, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L., ve Cook, K. F. (1989), “Intragroup Identication And Intergroup Differentiation: A Multicomponent Approach”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 28 (4), 305-317.
  • HOGG, M. (2006), “Social Identity Theory”. P. Burke (der.), Contemporary Social Psychological Theories içinde, US: Stanford University Press.
  • KEHRWALD, B. (2008), “ Understanding Social Presence in Text-Based Online Learning Environments.”, Distance Education, 29 (1), 89-106.
  • KIM, C. K., Han, D. ve Park, S. B. (2001), “The Effect Of Brand Personality and Brand Identification on Brand Loyalty: Applying The Theory Of Social Identification.”, Japanese Psychological Research Invited Paper, 43 (4), 195–206.
  • KOROSTELINA, K. V. (2007), Social Identity and Conflict, Gordonsville, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • KUENZEL, S. ve Halliday, S. V. (2008), “Investigating Antecedents and Consequences Of Brand Identification”, Journal of Product ve Brand Management, 17 (5), 293–304.
  • KUENZEL, S. ve Halliday, S. V. (2010), “The Chain of Effects from Reputation and Brand Personality Congruence to Brand Loyalty: The Role Of Brand İdentification.”, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18 (3/4), 167–176.
  • KUMAR, N. ve Benbasat, I. (2002), “Para-Social Presence: A Reconceptualization of ‘Social Presence’ to Capture the Relationship Between a Web Site and Her Visitors.”, In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
  • KWON, H. H. ve Armstrong, K. L. (2002), “ Factors Influencing Impulse Buying of Sport Team Licensed Merchandise”, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11 (3), 151-63.
  • LOMBARD, M. ve Ditton, T. (1997), “At The Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2),
  • MAEL, F. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1992), “ Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
  • MCALEXANDER, J. H., Schouten, J. W., ve Koenig, H. F. (2002), “ Building Brand Community”, Journal of Marketing, 66, 38–54.
  • MUNIZ Jr., A. M. ve O’Guinn, T. C. (2001), “Brand Community”, Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (March), 412-432.
  • OAKES, P. J., Turner, J. S. ve Haslam, S. A. (1991), “ Perceiving People As Group Members: The Role of Fit in the Salience of Social Categorizations”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (2), 125-144.
  • PREBISH, C. S. (1984), “ Heavenly Father: Divine Goalie, Sport and Religion”, The Antioch Review, 42 (3), 306-318.
  • ROGERS, P. ve Lea, M. (2005), “Social Presence in Distributed Group Environments: The Role of Social Identity”, Behaviour ve Information Technology, 24 (2), 151–158.
  • SELVERIAN, M. M. ve Hwang, H. S. (2003), “ In Search of Presence: A Systematic Evaluation of Evolving VLEs”, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12 (5), 512-522.
  • SHEN, K. N. ve Khalifa M. (2007), “Exploring Multi-dimensional Conceptualization of Social Presence in the Context of Online Communities”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24 (7), 999 - 1008.
  • SHEN, K. N. ve Khalifa M. (2008), “Exploring Multidimensional Conceptualization of Social Presence in the Context of Online Communities”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24 (7), 722-748.
  • SHEN, K. N., Yu, A. Y. ve Khalifa, M. (2010), “ Knowledge Contribution in Virtual Communities: Accounting for Multiple Dimensions of Social Presence through Social Identity”, Behaviour ve Information Technology, 29 (4), 337–348.
  • SHORT, J., Williams, E. ve Christie, B. (1976), The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, London; New York: Wiley.
  • SIA, C. L., Tan, B. ve Wei, K. K. (2002), “Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity”, Information Systems Research, 13 (1), 70 – 90.
  • SPEARS, R. ve Lea, M. (1992), “Social Influence and the Influence of the ‘Social’ in Computer-Mediated Communication”. M. Lea (der.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication içinde, Hemel Hempsted: Wheatsheaf. STOKBURGER-SAUER, N. (2010), “Brand Community: Drivers and Outcomes”, Psychology and Marketing, 27 (4), 347–368.
  • SUTTON, W. A., McDonald, M. A., Milne, G. R. ve Cimperman, J. (1997), “Creating and Fostering Fan Identification in Professional Sports”, Sport Marketing Quarterly [SMQ], 6(1), 15 - 22.
  • ŞENCAN, H. (2005), Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • ŞIMŞEK, Ö. F. (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve Lisrel Uygulamaları, Ankara: Ekinoks Basım.
  • TAJFEL, H. (1974), “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour”, Social Science Information, 13 (2), 65–93.
  • TAJFEL, H. (1978), Differentiation between Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, London: Academic Press.
  • TAJFEL, H. (1981), Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • TAJFEL, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1986), “The Social Identity Theory of İntergroup Behaviour”. S. Worchel ve W.G. Austin (der.), The Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd Ed.,7-24) içinde, Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • TURBAN, E., King, D., Lee, J., Liang, T. P. ve Turban, D. C. (2012), Electronic Commerce 2012 (7th ed.), US: Prentice Hall.
  • TURNER, J. C. (1975), “Social Comparison and Social Identity: Some Prospects For Intergroup Behaviour”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 5 (1), 5–34.
  • UNDERWOOD, R., Bond, E., ve Baer, R. (2001),“Building Service Brands via Social Identity: Lessons from the Sports Marketplace”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,9 (1), 1 13.
  • UZKURT, C. ve Özmen, M. (2006), “Pazarlama Yöneticileri İçin Yeni Bir Fırsat: Sanal Topluluklar”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 8 (1), 23-40.
  • WALTHER, J. B. (1992), “Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective”, Communication Research, 19 (1), 52-90.
  • WANG, G. (2002), “Attitudinal Correlates of Brand Commitment: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1(2), 57–75.
  • WANN, D. L. ve Branscombe, N. R. (1990), “Die-Hard and Fair-Weather Fans: Effects of Identification on BIRGing and CORFing Tendencies”, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14 (2), 103-17.
  • WANN, D. L. ve Branscombe, N. R. (1993), “Sports Fans: Measuring Degree of Identification with Their Team”, International Journal of Sports Psychology, 24 (1), 1-17.
  • ZHOU, Z., Zhang, Q., Su, C. ve Zhou, N. (2011), “How Do Brand Communities Generate Brand Relationships? Intermediate Mechanisms”, Journal of Business Research, 2-7.