THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC AT THE TURN OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES - MAINTAINING THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BY PROVIDING SECURITY TO MICROSTATES?

Following two waves of decolonization in the Pacific (1962-1970 and 1974-1980), the situation of island states in this region have changed radically. Finally independent microstates have gained their legal international opportunity to decide on own internal and regional policy. Nonetheless, post-colonial relations in the region were largely influenced by the Pacific Ring powers, led by the United States, which consequently created a unique local system. Such struggle in order to uphold influence in the Pacific occurred in the post-war period initially between the USA and Japan. Two imperial approaches emerged from these international movements, which were implemented in the diplomacy of both countries: “New world order” and its Japanese response – “New regional order”. Government in Washington maintains close relations with states in Oceania by changing their formal names (free association, unincorporated and unorganized territory, unincorporated and organized territory, commonwealth within the USA). In addition to organizational or scientific activity, the most important element of American policy towards the states in Oceania is the regional security shaping. The military presence of the US troops, regular RIMPAC naval exercises, growing diplomatic and economic investments in the South Pacific islands consolidate the image of a just sheriff of the new world order, a defender of young democracies on the verge of poverty struggling with civilization problems.

THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC AT THE TURN OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES - MAINTAINING THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BY PROVIDING SECURITY TO MICROSTATES?

Following two waves of decolonization in the Pacific (1962-1970 and 1974-1980), the situation of island states in this region have changed radically. Finally independent microstates have gained their legal international opportunity to decide on own internal and regional policy. Nonetheless, post-colonial relations in the region were largely influenced by the Pacific Ring powers, led by the United States, which consequently created a unique local system. Such struggle in order to uphold influence in the Pacific occurred in the post-war period initially between the USA and Japan. Two imperial approaches emerged from these international movements, which were implemented in the diplomacy of both countries: “New world order” and its Japanese response – “New regional order”. Government in Washington maintains close relations with states in Oceania by changing their formal names (free association, unincorporated and unorganized territory, unincorporated and organized territory, commonwealth within the USA). In addition to organizational or scientific activity, the most important element of American policy towards the states in Oceania is the regional security shaping. The military presence of the US troops, regular RIMPAC naval exercises, growing diplomatic and economic investments in the South Pacific islands consolidate the image of a just sheriff of the new world order, a defender of young democracies on the verge of poverty struggling with civilization problems.

___

  • APEC in Charts 2015, Policy Support Unit, November 2015.Australian-New Zealand Agreement 1944 from 21 January 1944.Baker R. W. 1993. Pacific Summit in Seattle: Testing Clinton’s Asia-Pacific Policy, Asia Pacific Issues, Analysis from the East-West Center No. 9, November 1993.Bell Ch. email to the author, 28.10.2017.Campbell I. Ch. 1989. A History of the Pacific Islands, University of Canterbury Press: Christchurch. Centre for Research on Globalization: https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sponsored-rim-of-the-pacific-rimpac-war-games-coopting-china-isolating-russia/5535240 Access on: 18.08.2019.CIA: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rm.html Access on: 18.08.2019.Clinton H. 2011. America's Pacific Century, “Foreign Policy”, 11.11.2011.Compact of Free Association Agreement between the United States of America and the Marshall Islands Treaties and other International Acts (Series 04-501) from 30 April 2003.Compact of Free Association Agreement between the United States of America and the Micronesia Treaties and other International Acts (Series 04-625) from 14 May 2003.Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Palau (48 USC 1931 note; Public Law 99-658) from 1 October 1994.Crocombe R. 2007, Asia in the Pacific Islands: Replacing the West, University of the South Pacific: Suva.Conrich I., Alessio D. (ed.) 2010. New Zealand, France and the Pacific, Kakapo Books: Nottingham. Denoon D., Meleisea M. (ed.) 1997. The Cambridge History of the Pacific Islanders, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Dorrance J. C. 1992. The United States and the Pacific Islands, Praeger: Ann Arbor .Drysdale P. 1983. The Proposal for an Organization for Pacific Trade and Development Revisited, “Asian Survey”, Vol. 23(12).East-West Center: www.eastwestcenter.org/pacific-islands-development-program/about-pidp Access on: 18.08.2019.Fanta E., Shaw T. M., Tang V. T. (ed.) 2016. Comparative Regionalisms for Development in the 21st Century: Insights from the Global South, Routledge, New York. Fischer S. R. 2002. A History of the Pacific Islands, Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke. Fitzpatrick – Nietschmann J. 1983. Pacific Islanders – migration and health, „The West Journal of Medicine” 139/6.Geopolitica.ru: https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/world-war-iii-indo-pacific-theatre Access on: 18.08.2019.Graf A. 2011. Countering Piracy and Maritime Terrorism in South East Asia and off the Horn of Africa, PiraT-Working Papers on Maritime Security Nr. 5, April 2011.Green M. 2008. The Changing Face of New Zealand Diplomacy, “New Zealand International Review” 33/6.Haliżak E. 1999. Stosunki międzynarodowe w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR: Warsaw. Haliżak E. 2006. Wspólnota Pacyfiku a Wspólnota Wschodnioazjatycka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Scholar”, Warsaw. Haliżak E., Kuźniar R. 2006. Stosunki międzynarodowe: geneza, struktura, dynamika, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warsaw.„Hawaii Public Radio” radio program Pacific News Minute: American Samoa Reconsiders US Ties from 18.11.2015.Hawthorn G. 2000. Azja i rejon Pacyfiku, Prószyński i S-ka: Warsaw.Hooper P. F. 1988. The Institute of Pacific Relations and the Origins of Asian and Pacific Studies, “Pacific Affairs” 61/1.Iati I. Speech Watching Their Customary Lands Slip Away? The Implications of Applying the Torrens System to Samoan Customary Land Tenure, New Zealand Studies Association (NZSA) Conference, Lugano 1.07.2016.Jędrusik M. 2005. Wyspy tropikalne: W poszukiwaniu dobrobytu, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warsaw.Joubert L. 2013. The extent of maritime terrorism and piracy: a comparative analysis, "South African Journal of Military Studies" 41/1.Kleinschmidt H. 2006. Migration, Regional Integration and Human Security: The Formation and Maintenance of Transnational Spaces, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.: Aldershot. Kukułka J. 2007. Historia współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych; 1945-2000 z kalendarium 2001-2006, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar: Warsaw.Lovelace D. (ed.) 2014. Terrorism: Commentary on Security Documents Volume 136: Assessing the Reorientation of U. S. National Security Strategy Toward the Asia-Pacific, Oxford University Press: New York.McIntyre W. D. and Jim W. 1971. Gardner Speeches and documents on New Zealand history, Clarendon Press: Oxford. Navy Live: http://navylive.dodlive.mil/2014/07/21/what-exactly-is-rimpac; http://navylive.dodlive.mil/2016/08/05/rimpac-builds-relationships-relationships-make-strong-partners Access on: 18.08.2019.Nelson E. S. 2012. Terrorism and Piracy: Existing and Potential Threats, "Global Security Studies" 3/1.New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act 1987.Pacific Economic Cooperation Council: www.pecc.org/about/member-committees Access on: 18.08.2019.Pacific Power Association: http://www.ppa.org.fj/what-is-ppa Access on: 18.08.2019.Pugh M. 1989. The ANZUS Crisis, Nuclear Visiting and Deterrence, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. „Radio Australia” radio program American Samoa must consider independence from 18.05.2012.Revised Constitution of American Samoa from 17 October 1960.Rinard Hinga B. D. 2015. Ring of Fire: An Encyclopedia of the Pacific Rim's Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Volcanoes, ABC-CLIO: Santa Barbara.Rotklein L., email to the author, 12.12.2014.Rymarczyk J. 2010. Międzynarodowe stosunki gospodarcze, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne: Warsaw.Scott D. 2007. The 21st Century as Whose Century?, “Official Journal of the Political Economy of the World-System Section of the American Sociological Association”, XIII(2).Smith M. P. 1989. Pacific Rim Cities in the World Economy: Comparative Urban and Community Research, Vol. 2, Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick.South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty from 6 August1985.Staats E. B. 1978. Report to Congress by the Comptroller General of the United States: East–West Center: progress and problems, United States General Accounting Office (15.02.1978).Tangredi S. (ed.) 2015. The U.S. Naval Institute on International Naval Cooperation, Naval Institute Press: Annapolis.Terry S. 1982. Where the wave of the future will crest?, “The Christian Science Monitor” (28.09.1982).United States Note to Japan from 26 November 1941. Dept. of State Bulletin 129 (13).US Department of State: www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/1839.htm, www.state.gov/p/eap/ci/rm/, www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/1840.htm, www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2011/11/176999.htm Access on: 18.08.2019.US Department of the Interior, Office of Insular Affairs: www.doi.gov/oia/islands/guam, www.doi.gov/oia/islands/cnmi Access on: 18.08.2019.Wellington Declaration on a New Strategic Partnership Between New Zealand and the United States from 4 November 2010.World Bank: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2015&name_desc=true&start=2015&view=map Access on: 18.08.2019.Yuzawa T. 2006. The Evolution of Preventive Diplomacy in the ASEAN Regional Forum: Problems and Prospects, “Asian Survey” 2006/46(5).