Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Gizlilik Yükümlülüğü

Gizlilik ve mahremiyet birbirlerine çok benzeyen ama bir o kadar da birbirlerinden farklı olan kavramlardır. Milletlerarası ticari tahkim, milletlerarası ticaret uygulayıcıları tarafından uyuşmazlık çözüm yolu olarak sıklıkla tercih edilen bir yoldur. Tarafların ticari sırlarının ve gizli bilgilerinin korunması tahkimin tercih edilme nedenlerindendir. Tarafların tahkim yargılaması sırasında edindikleri diğer tarafa ait bilgiler genel itibariyle gizli bilgi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Edinilen bu bilgilerin üçüncü kişilere açıklanamayacağı ve gizli kalacağı konusu ise, gizlilik yükümlülüğü kapsamında değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Milletlerarası ticari tahkim, Gizlilik yükümlülüğü, Mahremiyet, Ticari sır, Gizli bilgi

Confidentiality Obligation in International Commercial Arbitration

Confidentiality and privacy are similar concepts, on the other hand they are also distinctive. International commercial arbitration is commonly chosen by the international commercial practitioners for dispute resolution. Protection of trade secrets and confidential information is a ground for preferring arbitration. Information obtained during arbitral proceedings regarding counterparty, commonly deemed as confidential. Disclosure of such information is considered under the confidentiality obligations in arbitral proceedings.

Keywords:

International commercial arbitration, Confidentiality obligation, Privacy, Trade secrets, Confidential information,

PDF

___

AKINCI Ziya, Milletlerarası Tahkim, 4. Bs., İstanbul 2016.
BERGER Bernhard, KELLERHALS Franz, International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland, 3. Bs., Zürih 2015.
BORN Gary, International Commercial Arbitration, C. II, 2. Bs.,Londra 2014.
BULLARD Alfredo, Arbitration Guide, Peru, IBA Arbitration Committee, Nisan 2012.
CARTER James H., FELLAS John, International Commercial Arbitration in New York, New York 2010.
DE LY Filip, FRIEDMAN Mark, RADICATI DI BROZOLO Luca, International Law Association International Commercial Arbitration Committee's Report and Recommendations on “Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration”, 28 ArbInt’l, Y. 2012.
DESSEMONTET François, Arbitrationand Confidentiality, American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 1996.
DIMOLITSA Antonias, Institutional Rules and National Regimes Relating to the Obligation of Confidentiality on Parties in Arbitration in ICC, ICC Bulletin Special Supplement 2009.
DUNDAS Hew R.,Confidentiality in Arbitration: The Final Chapter?, Asian Dispute Resolution Journal, 2009.
ERDÖNMEZ Güray, Pekcanıtez Usûl Medeni Usûl Hukuku, 15. Bs., İstanbul 2017.
FOUCHARD Philippe, GAILLARD Emmanuel, GOLDMAN Berthold, International Commercial Arbitration, ed. Emmanuel GAILLARD and John SAVAGE, Lahey 1999.
FRY Jason, GREENBERG Simon, MAZZA Francesca, The Secreariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration, Paris 2012.
GİRAY Faruk Kerem, Milletlerarası Tahkimde Gizlilik, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 4, Sayı:2, 2015, İstanbul, 2015, s. 63-120.
GRIERSON Jacob, VAN HOOFT Annet, Arbitrating Under the 2012 ICC Rules, An IntroductoryUser’s Guide, Biggleswade 2012.
HARGROVE James, Misplaced Confidence? An Analysis of Privacy and Confidentiality in Contemporary Commercial Arbitration, (2009) 3 DispResInt'l., s. 47-55.
HWANG Michael, CHUNG Katie, Defining te Indefinable: Practical Problems of Confidentiality in Arbitration, Journal of International Arbitration, 26 (5), Yıl 2009 s. 609-645.
JIMENEZ Dyalá, Arbitration Guide, Costa Rica, IBA Arbitration Committee, Nisan 2012.
JOLLES Alexander, CANALS DE CEDIEL Maria, Confidentiality, International Arbitration in Switzerland: A Handbook for Practitioners, ed. Gabriele KAUFFMAN KOHLER, Blaise STUCKI, Zürih 2004.
KNAHR Christina, REINISCH August, Transparency Versus Confidentiality in International Investment Arbitration – TheBiwater Gauff Compromise, The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Vol 6, Issue 1, 2007, s. 97-118.
MISTELIS Loukas A.,Confidentialityand Third PartyParticipation, Arbitration International, Vol 21, No. 2.
ÖZSUNAY Ergun, Tahkim Yargılamasında Mahremiyet, Milletlerarası Tahkim Semineri, 2. Baskı, Ankara 2004.
PEKCANITEZ Hakan, YEŞİLIRMAK Ali, PekanıtezUsûl Medeni Usûl Hukuku, 15. Bs., İstanbul 2017
PEKCANITEZ Hakan, YEŞİLIRMAK Ali, PekanıtezUsûl Medeni Usûl Hukuku, 15. Bs., İstanbul 2017
RADJAI Noradéle, Confidentiality in International Arbitration, ASA Bulletin, Vol. 27, 1/2009, s. 48-49.
ROGERS Catherine, A., Transparency in International Commercial Arbitration, 54 University of Kansas LawReview, (2006), s. 1301-1337.
SAVILLE Mark Oliver, U.K. Departmental Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law, Report on the Arbitration Bill, 1996.
ŞANLI Cemal, ESEN Emre, ATAMAN FİGANMEŞE İnci, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 5. Bs., İstanbul 2016.
ŞANLI Cemal, Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Esasa Uygulanacak Hukuk(Esasa Uygulanacak Hukuk), Ankara 1986.
ŞANLI Cemal, Uluslararası Ticari Akitlerin Hazırlanması ve Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları, 6. Bs., İstanbul 2016.
TRACKMAN Leon E.,Confidentiality in International Private Commercial Arbitration. Arb. Int’l, Yıl 2002, s. 1-18.
TSCHANZ Pierre-Yves, Confidentiality of SwissSupreme Court Review of Arbitral Awards, Mondaq İş Sempozyumu, 28 Eylül 2006. WEBSTER Thomas H.,Handbook of UNCITRAL Arbitration, 2. Bs., Londra 2014.
YEŞİLIRMAK Ali, Interimand Conservatory Measures in ICC Arbitral Practice, 1998-2008, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, C. 22/1, Special Supplement , 2011, s. 5-11.