Üstün-Zekalı ve Normal-Zekalı Çocuklarda Yönetsel İşlevler: Londra Kulesi Testi

Mevcut çalışmada üstün-zekâlı öğrenciler,
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Üstün Zekâlı Çocuk­

Executive Functions in Gifted and Average Students: Tower of London Test

The present study used the Tower of London°X    (TOLDX)    test to  compare   executive planning ability among three groups:  average children group attending a regular education program, a gifted childen group and another average children group, both attending a differentiated education  program. The results of the study indicated that the gifted children preplanned better and solved the planning problems faster than the average children who were in the differentiated program. They also preplanned better and solved the problems correctly and faster with fewer excess moves than the average children in the regular program. The present findings  provided  a  support  to the assumption that planning as an executive function might be an indicator of general intelligence

___

  • Akarsu, F. (2001). Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar, Aileleri ve Sorunları. Ankara: Eduser Yayınları.
  • Ardila, A., Galeano, L . M . , & Rosselli, M . (1998). Toward a model o f neuropsy­ chological activity. Neuropsychology Review, 8, 171-190.
  • Ardila, A., Pineda, D. & Rosselli, M . (2000). Correlation between intelligence test scores and executive function measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 31-36.
  • Arffa, S. (2007). The relationship of intel­ ligence to executive function and non­ executive function measures in a sample of average, above average, and gifted youth. Archives of Clinical Neuropsy­ chology, 22, 969-978.
  • Crinella, F.M., & Yu, J. (1999). Brain mec­ hanisms and intelligence: Psychometric g and executive function. Intelligence, 27, 299-327).
  • Culbertson, W. C. & Zillmer, E. A. (2001). Tower of London - Drexel University (TOLDX): Technical Manual. New York: MHS.
  • Davaslıgil, U . (August 5, 1999). Enhan­ cement o f Creativity - A n Important Problem i n Turkish Education: A Com­ parative Study. A Challenge for the New Millennium: 13th World Congress of World Council for Gifted and Talented Children. Istanbul, Ceylan Hotel.
  • Davaslıgil, U . (2004). Üstün Çocuklar. Yer aldığı eser R. Şirin, A . Kulaksızoğlu ve A. E. Bilgili (Ed.), Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar: Seçilmiş Makaleler Kitabı, (ss. 211- 218). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları: 63, I. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Yayın Dizisi:1.
  • Davaslıgil, U., Aslan, E. & Beşkardeş, Ü. (2000). Üstün ve Özel Yetenekli Çocuk­ lara İlişkin A l t Komisyonu. Yer aldığı eser S. Usta, M . R. Şirin (Hazırlayanlar), I. İstanbul Çocuk Kurultayı Projeler Ki­ tabı (ss. 291 - 304). İstanbul: İstanbul Çocukları Vakfı Yayınları No.1.
  • Davaslıgil, U. & Leana, M . Z. (2004). Üstün Zekâlıların Eğitimi Projesi. Yer aldığı eser A. Kulaksızoğlu, A. E. Bilgili ve M . R. Şirin (Ed.), I. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (ss. 85 - 100). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Ya­ yınları: 64, I Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Yayın Dizisi: 2.
  • Deary, I . J. (2000). Looking Down on Hu­ man Intelligence: From Psychometrics to the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Deary, I . J. (2001a). Human intelligence differences: a recent history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 127-130.
  • Deary, I.J. (2001b). Human intelligence differences: towards a combined expe­ rimental-differential approach. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 164-170.
  • Deary, I.J., & Caryl, P.G. (1997). Neurosci­ ence and human intelligece differences. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 365-371.
  • Denckla, M . B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsycho­ logical perspective. G.R. Lyon ve N . A. Krasnegor (Ed.). Attention, Memory, and Executive Function içinde (ss. 263-278). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Desco, M . , Navas-Sanchez, F.J., Sanchez- Gonâlez, J., Reig, S., Robles, O., Fran­ co, C., Guzmân-De-Villoria, J.A., Garı cia-Barreno, P., & Arango, C. (2011). Mathematically gifted adolescents use more extensive and more bilateral areı as of the fronto-parietal network than controls during executive functioning and fluid reasoning tasks. Neorolmage, 57, 281-292.
  • Eslinger, P.J. (1996). Conceptualizing, describing, and measuing components of executive function: A summary. G.R. Lyon ve N . A. Krasnegor (Ed.). Atten­ tion, Memory, and Executive Function Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M . , Holmes, C. içinde (ss. 367-395). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Karakaş, S. (2004). BİLNOT Bataryası El Kitabı: Nöropsikolojik Testler için Araştırma ve Geliştirime Çalışmaları. Ankara: Dizayn Ofset.
  • Lockette, B. (2004, Ekim). Grants: Predic­ ting the gifted child. News and Press Re­ leases. 26 Aralık 2011, http://www.clas. ufl.edu/events/news/articles/200410_ grants.html
  • Neisser, U . , Boodoo, G., Bouchard, Jr., T. J., Boykin, A.W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D.F., Loehlin, J.C., Perlofff, R., Sternberg, R.J., & Urbina, S. (1996). In­ telligence: knowns and unknowns. Ame­ rican Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
  • Öner, N . (1997). Türkiye'de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler: Bir Başvuru Kaynağı Tunstall, J.R. (1999). Improving the Utility (3.basım). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversiı tesi Yayınları.
  • Raven, J. & Summers, B. (1990). Manualfor Raven's Progressive Matrices and Voca­ bulary Scales: Research Supplement, No 3 (2. Ed). Oxford: Oxford Psychological Press.
  • Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: A n Exeptionality Exami­ nes. [On-line serial] Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 211 - 230.
  • Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M . A. (1984). How Gifted Students Learn: Implications from Recent Research. Roeper Review, 6, 183 - 185.
  • Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 298, 199-209.
  • Shallice, T. (1988). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. New York: Camb­ ridge University Pres.
  • Sousa, D. A. (2003). How the gifted brain learns. California: Corwin Pres. J., Jernigan, T.L. & Toga, A. W. (1999). In-vivo Evidence for Post-Adolescent Brain Maturation i n Frontal and Stria­ tal Regions. Nature: Neuroscience, 2, 859 - 861.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Component proces­ ses in analogical reasoning. Psychologi­ cal Review, 84, 353-378.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The Concept of Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence, (pp. 3 - 16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2004). North American Approaches to Intelligence. I n R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), International Handbook of Intelligence, (pp. 411 - 444). Camb­ ridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. of the Tower of London, a Neuropsy­ chological Test of Planning. Unpublisı hed doctoral dissertation, University of Griffith, Australia.
  • Welsh, M.C., Pennington, B.F., & Groisser, D.B. (1991). A Normative - Develop­ mental Study of Executive Function: A Window on Prefrontal Function in Child- ren. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7 (2), 131
  • Zook, N.A., Davalos, D.B., DeLosh, E.L., & Davis, H.P. (2004). Working Me­ mory, Inhibiton, and Fluid Intelligence as Predictors of Performance on Tower of Hanoi and London Tasks. Brain and Cognition, 56, 286 - 292. Yazar Notları Mevcut makaledeki araştırma ikin­
  • ci yazarın danışmanlığını yaptığı bi­
  • rinci yazarın yüksek lisans tez çalışı
  • masından üretilmiştir.