THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE DECISION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGERS ININVESTING COMMON STOCKS: AN APPLICATION IN TURKEY

The high volatility of Capital market instruments in Turkey combined with the unpredictable nature of economy and dynamic political situation makes investment decision a complex and challenging task. Under these circumstances the role of portfolio managers gains importance. The portfolio managers who possess superior market knowledge, who have extensive experience and in-dept analysis and strong forecasting ability are able to make successful investment decisions. As an investment alternative, common stocks are a popular form of investing used by portfolio managers. They are popular, in part, because they offer investors the opportunity to tailor their investment programs to meet individual needs and preferences. With the growing importance in the role of equities to investors, the selection of attractive stocks is utmost importance to ensure a good return. This paper is conducted to determine the major criteria and their relative weights taken into consideration by portfolio managers when investing in common stocks in İstanbul Stock Exchange (İSE).

___

  • [1] Gitman, L.J. & Johenk, M.D. (2001). Fundamentals of investing. Boston: Addison Wesley.
  • [2] Markovvitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
  • [3] Sprenza, M.G. (1996). A Heuristic Algorithm for Portfolio Optimization Model Applied to Milan Stock Market. Computers&Operations Research, 23, 433-441.
  • [4] Dias, F. Çuadratic Programming Applied to Modern Portfolio Selection. (http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~cef/mac499-01 /monografi as/fdias-rec/QP.pdf). [11.03.2008],
  • [5] Akay, D.; Çetinyokuş, T. & Dağdeviren, M. (2002). Portföy Seçimi Problemi için KDS/GA Yaklaşımı-A DSS/GA for Portfolio Selection Problem. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(4), 125-138.
  • [6] Ulucan, A. (2002). Markowitz Kuadratik Programlama ile Portföy Seçim Modelinin, Sermaye Piyasasında Endeks ile Aynı Risk-Getiri Yapısına Sahip Portföyün Elde Edilmesinde Kullanım- An Application of the Markowitz Quadratic Programming Portfolio Selection Model: Determination of the Portfolio which has the same Risk- Retum Structure with the Ise-30 indice. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(2), 141-155.
  • [7] Atan, M. (2005). Karesel Programlama ile Portföy Optimizasyonu- Portfolio Optimization with Quadratic Programming. Proceediııgs of the 7th National Symposium on Econometri & Statistic, İstanbul, 70-83.
  • [8] Kıyılar, M. & Eroğlu, E. (2004). Tek Endeks Modeli ve Modelin İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasmda Uygulanması- Single Index Model and Application of the Model at İstanbul Stock Exchange. İ.Ü. işletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1): 21-38.
  • [9] Bozdağ, N.; Atlan, Ş. & Duman, S. (2005). Minimaks Portföy Modeli ile Markowitz Ortalama- Varyans Portföy Modelinin Karşılaştırılması- Comparising of the Minimax Portfolio Selection Method and Markowitz Mean-Variance Portfolio Model. Proceedings of the 7th National Symposium on Econometri & Statistic, İstanbul, 1-8.
  • [10] Ballestero, E.; Günther, M.; Pla-Santamaria, D. & Stummer, C. (2007). Portfolio Selection Under Strict Uncertainty: A Multi-Criteria Methodology and its Application to The Frankfurt and Vienna Stock Exchanges. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(3): 1476-1487.
  • [11] Bana, C.A.; Costa, E. & Soares, J.O. (2004). A Multicriteria Model for Portfolio Management. The European Journalo of Finance, 10(3): 198-211.
  • [12] Saaty, T.L. & Vargas, L.G. (2001). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Dordrecht, MA.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • [13] Winston, W. & Albrigt, C. (2000). Practical Management Science. Pacific Grove, CA.: Duxbury.
  • [14] Anderson, D.; Sweeney, D. & Williams, T (1997). An Introduction to Management Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hail.
Öneri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0845
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1994
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜKETİCİLERİN FARKLI PERAKENDECİ DENKLİĞİ ALGILAMA SEVİYELERİNE GÖRE PERAKENDECİ DENKLİĞİ BOYUTLARININ ALGILANMASINDA, SATINALMA NİYETİNDE VE DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERDEKİ FARKLILIKLAR

Tülay YENİÇERİ, Eyyup YARAŞ

TÜRKİYE’DE ENFLASYON SÜREKLİLİĞİNİN ABKBHO MODELLERİYLE ANALİZİ

K. Batu TUNAY

EMLAK PAZARINDA SATIŞ ETİĞİ

Serap ÇABUK, Deniz ZEREN

TEDARİK ZİNCİRİNDE SİPARİŞ İŞLEME SÜRECİ

Caner DİNÇER

THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES ON THE GROWTH OF SMALL FIRMS: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Gülruh GÜRBÜZ, Sinem AKYOL

TÜKETİCİLERİN KİTAP SATIN ALMA SÜRECİNDE ROL OYNAYAN UNSURLAR VE BU UNSURLARIN TÜKETİCİLERİN DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİ AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ: İSTANBUL İLİNDE BİR PİLOT ÇALIŞMA

Oylum KORKUT ALTUNA, Ceyda AYSUNA

THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE DECISION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGERS ININVESTING COMMON STOCKS: AN APPLICATION IN TURKEY

Bengü VURAN, Tuğba ŞİMŞEK GÜRSOY

MÜŞTERİ SADAKATİNİ GÜÇLENDİRMEDE HİZMET İYİLEŞTİRME ÇABALARININ ROLÜ

Fatma YÜKSEL ÇAKIR

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE TOOL AFTER TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ON TEXTILES AND CLOTHING: A STUDY OF TURKISH TEXTILES AND CLOTHING INDUSTRY

İrem ERDOĞMUŞ, Müjdelen İ. YENER, Orkun GÖZE

KÜRESEL REKABETTE LOJİSTİK OLGUSUNDA YENİ YAKLAŞIMLAR VE TÜRKİYE’DE LOJİSTİK HİZMET SUNAN İŞLETMELERİN YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLERİ

Emine KOBAN, Zerrin FIRAT, Hilal YILDIRIR KESER