REEXAMINATION OF LUCAS PARADOX: GRAVITY MODEL APPROACH FOR BRICS COUNTRIES

Although the neo-classical theory argues that capital should flow from developed countries to the developing countries until the marginal return of investment among countries is equalized, Lucas (1990) reached the conclusion that such capital flows have not occurred from US to India even though the marginal return of capital in India is about 58 times that of US. Lucas explained this paradoxical finding as of stemming from primarily human capital differences, external benefits of human capital and capital market imperfections. Lucas’s paradoxical findings brought intense debates with it on the subject and led to researches on other determinants of capital flows. In accordance with these discussions, our study questioned the existence of Lucas Paradox for BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) using panel data for 2002-2014 period. Findings obtained from the Augmented-Gravity model confirm the existence of Lucas Paradox in BRICS countries. In other words, marginal return of capital is not an important determinant of capital inflows towards BRICS countries. The general conclusions of the study show that capital inflows depend on institutional quality, agglomeration effect, trade openness degree, exchange rate and volatility of inflation.

___

  • AGIOMIRGIANAKIS, G., ASTERIO, D. & PAPATHOMA, K. (2003). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Panel Data Study For The OECD Countries, City University Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, No. 03/06, London, 1-18. ALFARO, L., KALEMLİ-ÖZCAN, S., & VOLOSOVYCH, V. (2008). Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? An empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 347-368. ANDERSON, J.E. (2016). The Gravity Model of Economic Interaction, Boston College and NBRE. ARRELANO, M. & BOND, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297. ASIEDU, E. (2002). On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different?, World Development, 30(1), 107-119. ASTERİOU, D. & HALL, S.G. (2011). Applied Econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan. AZÉMAR, C., & DESBORDES, R. (2013). Has the Lucas Paradox Been Fully Explained?. Economics Letters, 121(2), 183-187. BAL, H. & AKÇA, E. E. (2016). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Belirleyicileri: Seçilmiş Doğu Asya ve Pasifik Ülkelerinden Ampirik Bulgular, Sosyoekonomi Dergisi, 24(30), 91-111. BALTAGI, B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed). John Wiley & Sons. BYRNE, J. P., & FIESS, N. (2016). International Capital Flows to Emerging Markets: National and global determinants. Journal of International Money and Finance, 61, 82-100. CHOI, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of international money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272. CLEMENS, M. A., & WILLIAMSON, J. G. (2000). Where did British Foreign Capital Go? Fundamentals, Failures and the Lucas Paradox: 1870-1913 (No. w8028). National Bureau of Economic Research. DEMİRAL, M; BAL, H. & ALGAN, N. (2015). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Küresel Sermayeyi Çekme Konusunda Niçin Başarısız Olmaktadırlar? Balkan Ülkeleri İçin Lucas Paradoksunun Yeniden İncelenmesi, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(1), 13-30. DUNNING, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of international business studies, 11(1), 9-31. FRANKEN, C., & VAN WIJNBERGEN, S. (2010). Private Capital Flows to Low Income Countries: Country-Specific Effects and the Lucas Paradox. Available at SSRN 1537004. GÖKTAN, M. G. (2015). On the Explanation of the Lucas Paradox. Economics Letters, 137, 109-113. GÖRMEZÖZ, K. K. (2007). Türkiye’ye Doğrudan Gelen Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının İstihdam Üzerindeki Etkileri, Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 17-21. HERRMANN, S. & Kleinert, J. (2014). Lucas Paradox and Allocation Puzzle-Is the Euro Area Different? (No. 2014-01). University of Graz, Department of Economics. IMF- International Monetary Fund (2004). http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/bop/pdf/diteg20.pdf. (19.04.2018). JADHAV, P. (2012). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in BRICS Economies: Analysis of Economic, İnstitutional and Political Faktor, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, 5-14. KRUEGER, A. O. (1968). Factor Endowments and ER Capital Income Differences Amoung Countries, Economic Journal, 78, 641-659. LEVIN, A., LIN, C. F., & CHU, C. S. J. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. LOTHIAN, J. R. (2006). Institutions, Capital Flows and Financial Integration. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(3), 358-369. LUCAS, R. E. (1990). Why Does’t Capital Flow From Rich to Poor Countries?, The American Economic Review, 80(2), 92-96. NISTOR, P. (2015). FDI Implications on BRICS Economy Growth, Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 981-985. PENN WORLD TABLE. https://knoema.com/PWT2015/penn-world-table-9-0 (25.04.2018). PRASAD, E.; RAJAN, R. & SUBRAMANIAN, A. (2007). The Paradox of Capital: Is Foreign Capital Associated with Economic Growth and, If not, Why Does It Flow “uphill”?, A Quarterly Magazine of the IMF, 44(1), 1-8. PROTSENKO, A. (2003). Vertical and Horizontal Foreign Direct Investments in Transition Countries, Ph.D. thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich. PRS GROUP. https://www.prsgroup.com/(25.04.2018). REINHARDT, D., RICCI, L. A. & Tressel, T. (2013). International Capital Flows and Development: Financial Openness Matters. Journal of International Economics, 91(2), 235-251. REINHART, C. M. & ROGOFF, K. S. (2004). Serial Default and the" Paradox" of Rich to Poor Capital Flows (No. w10296). National Bureau of Economic Research. SARISOY, İ. & KOÇ, S. (2010). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Kurumlar Vergisi Gelirleri Üzerindeki Etkisinin Ekonometrik Analizi, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 133-153. SUMMERS, R. & HESTON, A. (1988). A New Set of International Comparison of Real Product and Price Levels: Estimates for 130 Countries, 1950-1985, Review of Income and Wealth, 34, 1-25. UNCTAD- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2016). World Investment Report, Newyork and Geneva, http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2016_en.pdf. UNCTAD- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development(2016).unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740 (19.04.2018). VERNON, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (2), 190-207. WADHWA, K. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Asian Countries: The Role of Market Seeking, Resource Seeking and Efficiency Seeking Factors, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(11), 219-220. WALSH, J. P. & YU, J. (2010). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Sectoral and Institutional Approach, IMF Working Papers, No. WP/10/187. WORLD BANK, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (19.04.2018).
Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-4796
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2003
  • Yayıncı: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İSTİSMARCI YÖNETİMİN İŞTEN AYRILMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL ETİK İLKELERİN DÜZENLEYİCİ VE ARACI ROLÜ

Kemal KÖKSAL, Ali GÜRSOY

BELEDİYE HİZMETLERİNİN ÖZELLEŞTİRİLMESİ: ŞİRKETLEŞEN BELEDİYE UYGULAMASI

Konur Alp DEMİR

DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR, İSTİHDAM VE GELİR EŞİTSİZLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ: GELİŞMİŞ ÜLKELER ÖRNEĞİ

Hamza ÇEŞTEPE, Havanur ERGÜN TATAR

TÜKETİCİNİN POSTMODERNİZMLE DEĞİŞEN ROLÜ: ONLİNE ÜRÜN KİŞİSELLEŞTİRMESİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Emre YILDIRIM

TÜRKİYE-AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ İLİŞKİLERİNİN ETKİLERİ BAĞLAMINDA TÜRKİYE SOSYAL POLİTİKASININ DEĞİŞİMİ

Kasım KARATAŞ, Mehmet BAŞCILLAR, Ali TAŞCİ

TÜKETİCİLERİN SÜPERMARKET TERCİH KRİTERLERİNİN VE MOBİL UYGULAMA DAVRANIŞLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Kumru UYAR, Burcu ORALHAN

VERGİYE GÖNÜLLÜ UYUMU ETKİLEYEN SOSYAL FAKTÖRLERİN VERGİ TAHSİLAT ORANLARI İLE İLİŞKİSİ: DOĞU KARADENİZ BÖLGESİNDEKİ SEÇİLMİŞ İLLERDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Özgür ÖMÜR, Uğur BELLİKLİ

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FİNANSAL OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYLERİNİN ANALİZİ: KAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ SARIKAMIŞ KAMPÜSÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Erdinç KARADENİZ, Levent KOŞAN, Erol GECGİN, Mehmet BEYAZGÜL

KİŞİSEL HARCAMA VERGİSİ VE ANALİZİ

Burcu DEĞERLİ, Pelin MASTAR ÖZCAN

TÜRKİYE' DE BÖLGE PLANLARININ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA HEDEFLERİ İLE UYUMUNUN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: GAP, DAP, DOKAP VE KOP ÖRNEKLERİ

Bülent DARICI, Mehmet Ali CANBOLAT