Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı

Öz Bu çalışmanın amacı değişik koşullarda emniyet kemerikullanımına etki eden faktörleri incelemektir.Sürücülerin emniyet kemeri kullanımı ile ilgili belirtmişoldukları tutumlar ile çeşitli davranış ve tutumlarıincelenerek her ne kadar jandarma ve polis emniyetkemeri kontrolü yapsa da bazı sürücülerin neden emniyetkemeri kullanmadıkları anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır.Sonuçlar, emniyet kemeri ve trafik güvenliğiyle ilgiliprogramları takip eden ve trafikte daha az heyecanarayan kişilerin daha büyük olasılıkla emniyet kemerikullandıklarını göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte, katılımcılarınsaldırgan tutumları ve polis ve kameralarınvarlığı da katılımcıların bazı şartlarda emniyet kemerikullanmalarına yol açtığını göstermiştir. Ancak, sonuçlarsürücülerin kaza geçirme ile ilgili algılarının emniyetkemeri kullanmalarına bir etkisinin olmadığınıgöstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı

___

  • Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  • Akbas, O., Guven, R., Cebeci, G., Bertlek, S. B., Alde- mir, G., & Bal, E. (2010). A study on the effects of seat belt posters on drivers. Procedia-Social and Be- havioral Sciences, 2(2), 1002-1007.
  • Arnett, J. J. (1994). Sensation seeking: A new concep- tualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16 (2), 289-296.
  • Arnett, J. J. (1996). Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 20 (6), 693-702.
  • Arnett, J. J., Offer, D., & Fine, M. A. (1997). Reckless driving in adolescence: "State" and "trait" factors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29 (1), 57-63.
  • Beck, L. F., & Shults, R. A. (2009). Seat belt use in states and territories with primary and secondary laws- -United States, 2006. Journal of safety research,40 (6), 469-472.
  • Bilgic, S., Barut, H. B., Karacasu, M., Er, A., & Yaliniz, P. (2011). The changes in usage of seat belts in Antalya, Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 588-593.
  • Block, A. W. (2002). 2000 motor vehicle occupant safety survey: Seat belt report. US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  • Budd, R. J., North, D., & Spencer, C. (1984). Understanding seat‐belt use: A test of Bentler and Speckart's extension of the "theory of reasoned action". European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 69-78.
  • Campbell, B. J. (1989). The association between enforcement and seat belt use. Journal of safety Research, 19(4), 159-163.
  • Chaudhary, N. K., Solomon, M. G., & Cosgrove, L. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived risk of being ticketed and self-reported seat belt use. Journal of Safety Research, 35(4), 383-390.
  • Cohen, A., & Einav, L. (2003). The effects of mandatory seat belt laws on driving behavior and traffic fatalities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 828-843.
  • Cummings, P., Wells, J. D., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Estimating seat belt effectiveness using matched-pair cohort methods. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(1), 143-149.
  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Filetti, L. B., Dahlen, E. R., & Oetting, E. R. (2003). Anger, aggression, risky behavior, and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(3), 333-349.
  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Yingling, D. A. (2001). Driving anger: Correlates andtest of statetrait theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1321-1331.
  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., & Lynch, R. S. (1994). Development of a driving anger scale. Psychological reports, 74(1), 83-91.
  • Demirer, A., Durat, M., & Hasimoglu, C. (2012). Investigation of seat belt use among the drivers of different education levels. Safety science, 50(4), 1005-1008.
  • Dinh-Zarr, T. B., Sleet, D. A., Shults, R. A., Zaza, S., Elder, R. W., Nichols, J. L., Thompson, R. S., & Sosin, D. M. (2001). Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase the use of safety belts. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21(4), 48-65.
  • European Transport Safety Council (2010). 4th annual road safety performance index (PIN) report. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://etsc.eu/4th- annual-road-safety-performance-index-pin- report/
  • Evans, L. (1986). The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities. Accident Analysis & Preventi- on, 18(3), 229-241.
  • Evans, L. (1988). Rear seat restraint system effective- ness in preventing fatalities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 20(2), 129-136.
  • Evans, L. (1990). Restraint effectiveness, occupant ejection from cars, and fatality reductions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 22(2), 167-175.
  • Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Evans, L. (1996). Safety-belt effectiveness: The influen- ce of crash severity and selective recruitment. Acci- dent Analysis & Prevention, 28(4), 423-433.
  • Evans, L., & Frick, M. C. (1986). Safety belt effectiveness in preventing driver fatalities versus a number of vehicular, accident, roadway, and environmental factors. Journal of Safety Research, 17(4), 143-154.
  • Fernandes, R., Hatfield, J., & Soames Job, R. F. (2010). A systematic investigation of the differential predictors for speeding, drink-driving, driving while fatigued, and not wearing a seat belt, among young drivers. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(3), 179-196.
  • Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 1189- 1208.
  • Hennessy, D. A., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1999). Traffic congestion, driver stress, and driver aggressi- on. Aggressive Behavior, 25(6), 409-423.
  • Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135-150.
  • Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. (2002). Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 33 (8), 1251-1263.
  • Jonah, B. A. (1986). Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18(4), 255-271.
  • Jonah, B. A. (1990). Age differences in risky driving. Health Education Research, 5(2), 139-149.
  • Jonah, B. A. (1997). Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29(5), 651-665.
  • Jonah, B. A., Thiessen, R., & Au-Yeung, E. (2001). Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(5), 679-684.
  • Lajunen, T., & Ozkan, T. (2011). Self-report instruments and methods. In B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of Traffic Psychology (pp.43-59). San Diego, CA: Elseveir.
  • Lajunen, T., & Parker, D. (2001). Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33 (2), 243-255.
  • Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (1995). Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 307-318.
  • Lajunen, T., Parker, D., & Stradling, S. G. (1998). Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 107-121.
  • Lund, A. K., Stuster, J., & Fleming, A. (1989). Special publicity and enforcement of California's belt use law: making a "secondary" law work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17(5), 329-341.
  • Ozkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship between sex and gender‐role on aggressive driving, traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers. Aggressive Behavior, 31(6), 547-558.
  • Ozkan, T., Puvanachandra, P., Lajunen, T., Hoe, C., & Hyder, A. (2012). The validity of self-reported seatbelt use in a country where levels of use are low. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 47, 75-77.
  • Pligt, J. (1996). Risk perception and self-protective behavior. European Psychologist, 1(1), 34-43.
  • Pligt, J. (1998). Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3(1), 1-14.
  • Porter, B. E., Lajunen, T., Ozkan, T., & Will, K. E. (2010). A behavioral observation study of Turkish drivers' and children's safety belt use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1607-1609.
  • Rundmo, T., & Iversen, H. (2004). Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science, 42(1), 1-21.
  • Simsekoglu, O., & Lajunen, T. (2008a). Environmental and psychosocial factors affecting seat belt use among Turkish front-seat occupants in Ankara: Two observation studies. Traffic injury prevention, 9(3), 264-267.
  • Simsekoglu, O., & Lajunen, T. (2008b). Why Turks do not use seat belts? An interview study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 470-478.
  • Simsekoglu, O., & Lajunen, T. (2009). Relationship of seat belt use to health and driver behaviors. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 12(3), 235-241.
  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective. Accident Analysis & Prevention,10(4), 281-285.
  • Stasson, M., & Fishbein, M. (1990). The relation between perceived risk and preventive action: A within‐subject analysis of perceived driving risk and intentions to wear seatbelts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(19), 1541-1557.
  • Stead, M., Tagg, S., MacKintosh, A. M., & Eadie, D. (2005). Development and evaluation of a mass media Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. Health Education Research, 20(1), 36-50.
  • Svenson, O., Fischhoff, B., & MacGregor, D. (1985). Perceived driving safety and seatbelt usage. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 17(2), 119-133.
  • Turkish National Police (2014). Emniyet kemeri neden gereklidir. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http:// www.trafik.gov.tr/Sayfalar/EmniyetKemeriKullanimi.aspx
  • Ulleberg, P. (2002). Personality subtypes of young drivers: Relationship to risk-taking preferences, accident involvement, and response to a traffic safety campaign. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,4(4), 279-297.
  • Williams, A. F., & Wells, J. K. (2004). The role of enforcement programs in increasing seat belt use. Journal of Safety Research, 35(2), 175-180.
  • Williams, A. F., Lund, A. K., Preusser, D. F., & Blomberg, R. D. (1987). Results of a seat belt use law enforcement and publicity campaign in Elmira, New York. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 19(4), 243-249.
  • Williams, A. F., Reinfurt, D., & Wells, J. K. (1996). Increasing seat belt use in North Carolina. Journal of Safety Research, 27(1), 33-41.
  • Williams, A. F., Wells, J. K., McCartt, A. T., & Preus- ser, D. F. (2001). "Buckle up now!" An enforcement program to achieve high belt use. Journal of Safety Research, 31(4), 195-201.
  • Xie, C., & Parker, D. (2002). A social psychological approach to driving violations in two Chinese cities. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5 (4), 293-308.
  • Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

___

APA DEMİRKOL İ, TOSUN H, YÜKSEL Y (2015). Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 139 - 152.
Chicago DEMİRKOL İsmail Cenk,TOSUN Hamza,YÜKSEL Yusuf Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 15, no.2 (2015): 139 - 152.
MLA DEMİRKOL İsmail Cenk,TOSUN Hamza,YÜKSEL Yusuf Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.15, no.2, 2015, ss.139 - 152.
AMA DEMİRKOL İ,TOSUN H,YÜKSEL Y Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015; 15(2): 139 - 152.
Vancouver DEMİRKOL İ,TOSUN H,YÜKSEL Y Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015; 15(2): 139 - 152.
IEEE DEMİRKOL İ,TOSUN H,YÜKSEL Y "Tehlikeli Araç Kullanma: Kamuda Çalışan Şoförlerin Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı." Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15, ss.139 - 152, 2015.
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Çatışma Çözme Becerilerine Yönelik İhtiyaçlar ve Çatışma Durumlarını Yönetme Becerileri Ölçeklerinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Nermin Koruklu, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tarık Totan, Arş. Grv. Ali Serdar Sağkal

Bitmeyen Savaş :Diyarbakır’da Terör-Uyuşturucu İlişkisi

Doç. Dr. Hakan Cem Çetin, Dr. Hacı Duru

Satın Alma Niyetinin Öngörüsünde Planlı Davranış Modeli'nin Farklı Ürün Sınıfları İçin Denenmesi

Taner SIĞINDI, Bahtışen KAVAK

Ülkelerin Ekonomik Performansı Üzerinde Regülasyonun Etkileri: Bir Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Prof. Dr. Kemal Yıldırım, Yrd. Doç. Dr. S. Fatih Kostakoğlu

Neokoros Düşüncesinin Kökeni ve Gelişimi: Tanrı, Kutsal Krallık ve Yönetici İlişkisi

Arş. Grv. Adem Yurtsever

MMPI Profiles of the Students Who Applied and Won Air Traffic Control and Pilot Training Programs at Anadolu University

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rüçhan GÖKDAĞ

Türkiye’de Gıda ve Tarımsal Ürün Fiyatlarını Uluslararası Belirleyicileri

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Arzu Tay Bayramoğlu, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Asuman Koç Yurtkur

Satın Alma Niyetinin Öngörüsünde Planlı Davranış Modeli’nin Farklı Ürün Sınıfları İçin Denenmesi

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Taner SIĞINDI, Prof. Dr. Bahtışen KAVAK

Bitmeyen Savaş :Diyarbakır'da Terör-Uyuşturucu İlişkisi

Hacı DURU, Hakan Cem ÇETİN

İklimsel ve Coğrafi Özelliklerin Vergi Uyumuna Etkisi

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Güner TUNCER, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Taner GÜNEY