Evaluation of the Cittaslow Administrators to the Process of Cittaslow Participation and Sustainability

Öz Cittaslow Movement has developed rapidly around the world in recent years. Cittaslow movement is turning into an important tool for our cities to become sustainable destinations. In this context, cittaslow administrators, who are coordinators and stakeholders in the expansion of the movement, have great importance for the spread of the cittaslow movement and for its sustainability. The aim of this study is to reveal the assessments of cittaslow administrators regarding the destination and cittaslows in terms of cittaslows’ objectives, criteria, involvement process and sustainability by putting forth their profiles. The further aim of this study is to evaluate the factors prominent in the process of participation in the cittaslow movement, aspiring to conserve the original identity of the cities and to develop them in terms of the cittaslows’ administrators. In this study, by taking the opinions of the administrators in the process of their participation, supplying the compulsory conditions which are required and revealing the contributions which the movement will make, identifying the similarities and the differences between the administrators has been aimed. In the study, as a data collection tool, the questionnaire technique was used. Within the scope of the study, the data collection instrument was developed in line with the related literature and with expert opinions. The population of this study included directors of cittaslows. The questionnaires were applied to all Cittaslow administrators (167 administrators), and the feedback was returned from 70 administrators. In addition to the descriptive statistics; Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used for the analysis of the obtained data, and the profiles of cittaslow administrators were determined. The objectives of cittaslows were classified according to their severity, and their criteria were classified in accordance with their degree of difficulty by the administrators. Evaluation of administrators regarding involvement in cittaslow movement was identified, and contribution of cittaslows to sustainability and the sustainability of the destination were evaluated by the directors. Finally, the conclusions and the implications were discussed in detail on the basis of the research findings. In addition, the contributions of the study to the literature were mentioned, and related suggestions were put forward to develop cittaslow movement.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Cittaslow, sustainability, the process of participation in cittaslow movement

PDF

___

Cittaslow, (2016). Association. Retrieved from http://www.cittaslow.org/section/association.
Cittaslow Charter, (2013). Retrieved from http://www.cittaslow.org/download/DocumentiUfficiali/2009/newcharter[1].pdf
Cittaslow Turkey, (2016). Retrieved from http://www.cittaslowturkiye.org.
Coşar, Y. (2013). Yavaş Şehir (Cittaslow) Olgusunun Turist Davranışları ve Yerel Halkın Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi Algısına Etkileri. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi/ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
Dietz, A. (2006). Citta´slow – das gute Leben. Kulturelles Erbe, Nachhaltigkeit und Lebensqualita¨t in Kleinsta¨dten. Magisterarbeit: Universitat Tubingen.
Doğutürk, G. (2010). Mimari ve Yaşam Kalitesi Bağlamında Yavaş Şehir Hareketi ve Seferihisar Örneği. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi/ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Heitmann, S., Robinson, P. & Povey, G. (2011). Slow food, slow cities and slow tourism. S. H. P. Robinson & S. P. Heitmann (Eds.), In Research themes for tourism (pp. 114–127). Wallingford: CAB International.
Jones, P., Shears, P., Hillier, D., Comfort, D., & Lowell, J. (2003). Return to Traditional Values? A Case Study of Slow Food. British Food Journal, 105(4/5), 297-304.
Keskin, E. B. (2010). Sürdürülebilir Kent Kavramına Farklı Bir Bakış Olarak Yavaş Şehirler (Cittaslow): Seferihisar Örneği. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Dumlupınar Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kütahya.
Knox, P. L. (2005). Creating Ordinary Places: Slow Cities in a Fast World. Journal of Urban Design, 10 (1), 1–11.
Kozak, A., M. & Aksöz, E. O. (2012). Eskişehir İli Seyitgazi İlçe Merkezinin Sakin Şehir (Cittaslow) Hareketi Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi. (BAP projesi). Anadolu Üniversitesi/ Proje birimi, Eskişehir.
Loades, C.M. (2005). Tempo Giusto: Slow Cities and the Revitalization of Locality In The Age of Globalization, Institute of Social Anthropology. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Oslo Üniversitesi, Norveç.
Mayer, H. & Knox, P. L. (2006). Slow Cities: Sustainable Places in A Fast World. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(4), 321-334.
Miele, Mara (2008). CittàSlow: Producing Slowness Against The Fast Life, Space and Polity, 12 (1), 135.
Nilsson, J.H., Svärd A., Widarsson Å. ve Wirell T. (2011). “Cittáslow” Eco-Gastronomic Heritage As A Tool For Destination Development, Current Issues İn Tourism, 14(4), 373-386.
Ocha, W. (2004). Briefing Notes, Cittaslow: The Slow City Movements.
Özdemir, G. (2008). Destinasyon Pazarlaması. Ankara: Detay.
Parkins, W. ve Craig G. (2006). Slow Living. New York: Oxford International Publishers.
Petrini, C. (2005). Slow Food, The Case for Taste. New York: Columbia University.
Pink, S. (2006). Cittaslow Movement, The Case Study Ludlow, UK.
Pink, S. (2008a). Re-Thinking Contemporary Activism: From Community to Emplaced Sociality. Ethnos, 73(2), 163-188.
Pink, S. (2008b). Sense and Sustainability: The Case of the Slow City Movement. Local Environment, 13(2), 95-106.
Pink, S. (2009). Urban Social Movements and Small Places: Slow Cities as Sites of Activism. City, 13(4), 451-465.
Radström, S. J. (2005). An Urban Identity Movement Rooted in the Sustainability of Place: A Case Study of Slow Cities and Their Application in Rural Manitoba. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Manitoba Üniversitesi, Kanada.
Radström, S. J. (2011). Identity: An Introduction and History of Cittàslow”, Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 1(1), 90-113.
Sezgin, M. ve Ünüvar, Ş. (2011), Yavaş Şehir; Sürdürülebilirlik ve Şehir Pazarlaması Ekseninde. Konya: Çizgi.
Schneider, S. (2008). Good, Clean, Fair: The Rhetoric of the Slow Food Movement. College English, 70(4).
Yılmazer, A. (2005). Belediye Yöneticilerinin İş Ahlakı ve Sosyal Sorumluluğa Yönelik Tutumlarının İncelenmesi: Adapazarı Büyükşehir ve Merkez Belediyesi’nde Bir Araştırma. (Sempozyumda sunulan bildiri). 2. Siyasette ve Yönetimde Etik, Sakarya.
Yurtseven, H. R., Kaya O. & Harman S. (2010). Yavaş Hareketi. Ankara: Detay.