___

• Abebe, M.A., Angriawan, A. (2014). Organizational and Competitive Influences of Exploration and Exploitation Activities in Small Firms. Journal of Business Research, 67 (3), 339-345. doi: 10.1016/j. jbusres.2013.01.015
• Akdoğan, S., Akdoğan, A.A., Cingöz, A. (2009). Or-ganizational Ambidexterity: An Empirical Exa-mination of Organizational Factors as Antece-dents of Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 3 (2), 17-27. http://isma.info/uploads/files/017-organizational-ambidexterity-an-empirical-examination-of-organizational-factors-as-antecedents-of-organizational-ambidexterity.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Andriopoulos, C., Lewis, M.W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambi-dexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Or-ganization Science, 20 (4), 696-717. doi: 10.1287/ orsc.1080.0406
• Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402. doi: 10.2307/3150783
• Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability– Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Jo-urnal of Marketing, 69 (4), 61–83. http://www.jstor. org/stable/2640396 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator Me-diator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
• Benner, M. J., Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploration, Exploitation, and Process Management: The Pro-ductivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Ma-nagement Review, 28 (2), 238-256. doi: 10.5465/ AMR.2003.9416096
• Bierly, P. E., Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Or-ganizational Performance in Small Manufactu-ring Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Prac-titioners, 31 (4), 493–516. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x
• Bot, S.D., (2012), Process Ambidexterity for Entrepre-neurial Firms, Technology Innovation Management Review, April, http://timreview.ca/sites/default/ files/article_PDF/Bot_TIMReview_April2012.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997). The Art of Con-tinuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentless Shifting Orga-nizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 1–34. doi: 10.2307/2393807
• Bryant, P. (2009), The Role of Ethics in Developing Entrepreneurial Ambidexterity. Proceedings of Regional Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2009: 6th International Australian Graduate Scho-ol of Entrepreneurship (AGSE) (03-06 February 2009), South Australia, Australia: Entrepreneurs-hip Research Exchange, Adelaide, http://researc-hbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/services/ Download/swin:34336/SOURCE1 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Bryman, A.ve Cramer, D. (2009). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 14, 15,& 16 Guide for Social Scientists, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Burgers, H. Jansen, J.P. (2008). Organızational Am-bidexterity and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Differential Effects on Venturing, Innovation and Renewal Processes. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 28 (19), http://digitalknowledge.babson. edu/fer/vol28/iss19/2 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Burns, P. (2001). Entreprenurship and Small Business, Gordonsville, VA, USA: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Ana-lizi El Kitabı (10. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Chandler, G.N. Hanks, S.H. (1993). Measuring the Performance of Emerging Businesses: A Validation Study. Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (5), 391–408. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(93)90021-V
• Chang, Y.C., Chen, M.H., Chi, H.R., Lee, H. (2014). Ambidextrous Innovation Capabilities, An-tecedents and Performance. 2014 Proceedings of PICMET’14: Infrastructure and Service In-
• tegration. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/ stamp.jsp?arnumber=6921281 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Chen, M.H., Chang, Y.Y., Chang, Y.C. (2015). Entrep-reneurial Orientation, Social Networks, and Crea-tive Performance: Middle Managers as Corporate Entrepreneurs. Creative and Innovation Perfor-mance, 24 (3), 493-507. doi: 10.1111/caim.12108
• Covin, J.G., Slevin, D.P. (1988). The Influence of Or-ganization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepre-neurial Top Management Style. Journal of Manage-ment Studies, 25 (3), 217–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00033.x
• Covin, J.G., Slevin, D. (1991). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behaviour. Entreprene-urship Theory and Practice, 16 (1), 7–26.
• Covin, J.,G., Wales, W.J. (2011), The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurs-hip Theory and Practice, 36 (4), 677-702, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x
• Covin, J.G., Miller, D. (2014). International Entrepre-neurial Orientation: Conceptual Considerations, Research Themes, Measurement Issues, and Future Research Directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38 (1), 11–44. doi: 10.1111/etap.12027
• Douglas, E., Shepherd, D. (2002). Self-employment as a Career Choice: Attitudes, Entrepreneurial Inten-tions, and Utility Maximization. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 26 (3), 81-90. http://eprints. qut.edu.au/5527/1/5527_1.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Duncan, R. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. Kill-man, R. H., Pondy, L. R., Sleven, D. (eds.), The ma-nagement of organization içinde, pp. 167-188, New York: North Holland.
• Efrat, K. (2014). The Direct and Indirect Impact of Culture on Innovation. Technovation, 34 (1), 12-20. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.08.003
• Engelen, A., Gupta, V., Strenger, L., Brettel, M. (2015), Entrepreneurial Orientation, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Transformational Lea-dership Behaviors. Journal of Management, 41 (4), 1069-1097. doi: 10.1177/0149206312455244
• Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizati-onal Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Jour-nal, 47 (2), 209–226. doi: 10.2307/20159573
• Hambrick, D.C., Geletkanycz, M.A., Fredrickson, J.W. (1993). Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo: Some Tests of its Determinants. Strategic Ma-nagement Journal, 14 (6), 401–418. doi: 10.1002/ smj.4250140602
• He, Z.L., Wong, P.K. (2004). Exploration vs. Explo-itation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15 (4), 481-494. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
• Hornsby, J., Bloodgood, J., Turnley, W.H. (2011). The Effect of Strategic Planning Flexibility, Absorbtive Capacity, Ambidexterity, and Entrepreneurial Ori-entation (EO) on Organizational Outcomes: An Empirical Analysis (Summary). Frontiers of Entre-pereneurship Research, Proceedıngs of the Thırty-Fırst Annual Entrepreneurshıp Research Conference, 31 (12), 424 article 11. http://digitalknowledge.babson. edu/fer/vol31/iss12/11 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Huang, S., Ding, D., Chen, Z. (2014). Entrepreneurial Leadership and Performance in Chinese New Ven-tures: A Moderated Mediation Model of Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Environ-mental Dynamism, Creativity and Innovation Ma-nagement, 23 (4), 453-471. doi: 10.1111/caim.12085.
• Kollmann, T, Stöckmann, C. (2012). Filling Entrepre-neurial Orientation-Performance, Gap: The Me-diating Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38 (5), 1001-1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00530.x
• Kortmann, S. (2014). The Mediating Role of Strategic Orientations on The Relationship Between Ambi-dexterity-Oriented Decisions and Innovative Am-bidexterity. Journal of Innovation Management, 32 (5), 666-684. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12151
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive Capacity, Envi-ronmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (4), 822–846. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670902
• Lin, H.E. McDonough, E.F.III, Lin, S.J., Lin, C.Y.Y. (2013). Managing the Exploitation/Exploration Paradox: The Role of a Learning Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity. Journal of Producti-on Innovation Management, 30 (2), 262–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x
• Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integrati-on. Journal of Management. 32 (5), 646-672. doi: 10.1177/0149206306290712
• Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrep-reneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), 135–173. http://www.jstor.org/stable/258632 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2 (1), 71−87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634940
• Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J.T., Özsomer, A. (2002). The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance. Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 18–32. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/3203452 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016).
• Meeks, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial Ambidexterity (In-teractive Paper). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Rese-arch, Proceedıngs of the Thırty-Second Annual Ent-repreneurshıp Research Conference, 32 (12), article 21. http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol32/ iss12/21 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2016).
• Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29 (7), 770–91. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
• Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) Revisited: A Reflection on EO Research and Some Suggestions fort he Fu-ture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (5), 873-894. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00457.x
• Onyemah, V., Pesquera, M.R. (2015). Cognitive Am-bidexterity in Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Four Country Exploratory Study of Women Entreprene-urs’ Early Customer Acquisition Strategies. Organi-zations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 6 (1), 10-28. http://www.om.ef.vu.lt/cms/cache/RePEc_ files/article_65.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2016).
• O’Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, And Future, The Aca-demy of Management Perspectives, 27 (4), 324–338. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025
• Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Pros-pects. Journal of Management, 12 (4), 531–544. doi: 10.1177/014920638601200408
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J., Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common Method Bias in Behavio-ral Research: A Critical Review of The Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Preacher, K.J., Leonardelli, G.J. (2001). An Interac-tive Calculation Tool for Mediation Tests. http:// quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2016).
• Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Perfor-mance, Organization Science, 20 (4), 685–695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
• Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G.T., Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Busi-ness Performance: An Assessment of Past Rese-arch and Suggestions for The Future. Entreprene-urship Theory and Practice, 33 (3), 761–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
• Reyhanoğlu, M., Sırkıntıoğlu Yıldırım, Ş. (2016). Aile İşletmelerinde Aile Değerlerinin Örgüt Kültürüne Etkisi, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Der-gisi, 5 (3 Ekonomi & İşletme Özel Sayı), 574-596.
• Reyhanoğlu, M., Akın, Ö. (2015). Örgüt Kültürü Tipleri İnovasyonda Eşit İki Yönlülüğü (Ambidexterity) Be-lirler mi?. Ege Innovation Network “İnovasyon Eko-sistemleri Aracılığı ile Değer Yaratmak: Disiplinler Arası Yaklaşımlar Kongresi (26-27 Kasım), Bildiri CD içinde, Seferihisar/İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi.
• Rodriguez, P.R., Hechanova, M.R.M. (2012). A Study of Culture Dimensions, Organizational Ambidex-terity, and Perceived Innovation in Teams. Jour-nal of Management Innovation, 9 (3), 21-33. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000300002
• Schillo, S. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Company Performance: Can the Academic Lite-rature Guide Managers?. Technology Innovation Management Review, November, 20-25, http:// timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Schil-lo_TIMReview_November2011.pdf, (Erişim Tari-hi: 06.05.2016)
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J.F., Souder, D. (2009). A Typology for Aligning Organizatio-nal Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Ante-cedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (5), 864–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
• Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Mo-dels. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. doi: 10.2307/270723
• Stubner, S, Blarr, H.W., Brands, C., Wulf, T. (2012), Organizational Ambidexterity and Family Firm Performance, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 25 (2), 217-229. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2012.10593570
• Tuan, L.T. (2016). Organizational Ambidexterity, Ent-repreneurial Orientation, and I-Deals: The Mode-rating Role of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 135 (1), 145-159. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2476-1
• Tushman, M.L., O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revo-lutionary Change. California Management Review, 38 (4), 8-30. doi: 10.2307/41165852
• TÜİK Seçilmiş Göstergelerle Hatay 2013 (2014). Tür-kiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Matbaası, http://www.hatay.gov.tr/ku-rumlar/hatay.gov.tr/İçerikler/İndirme%20Dosya-ları/İstatistikler/hatay_il_ istatistikler.pdf (Erişim Tarihi 19.04.2016).
• Volery, T., Mueller, S., Siemens, B.V. (2015). Entrepre-neur Ambidexterity: A Study of Entrepreneur Be-heviours and Competencies in Growth-Orientede Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Internati-onal Small Business Journal, 33 (2), 109-129. doi: 10.1177/0266242613484777
• Wang, C.L., Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous Organi-zational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High-Tech Firms. British Journal of Management, 25 (1), 58-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
• West, S.G., Finch, J.F., Curran, P.J. (1995). Structu-ral Equation Models with Nonnormal Variables. Problems and Remedies. R.H. Hoyle (Ed.). Struc-tural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and appli-cations içinde, pp. 56-75. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneuri-al Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach. Journal of Busi-ness Venturing, 20 (1), 71–91. doi:10.1016/j.jbus-vent.2004.01.001
• Yu, R., He, J., Liu, Z. (2014). The Co-volution of Orga-nizational Culture Transformation and Ambidext-rous Capability: A Strategic Orientation Perspecti-ve. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 2 (2), 102-105. doi: 10.12720/joams.2.2.102-105
• Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D.O. (1998). Environmental Diversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of New Ventures. Journal of Developmental Entrepre-neurship, 3 (2), 123–140.
• Zhou, K.Z., Yim, C.K., Tse, D.K. (2005). The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations. Jo-urnal of Marketing, 69 (2), 42–60. doi: 10.1509/ jmkg.69.2.42.60756
• Zhou, K.Z. (2006). Innovation, Imitation, and New Product Performance: The Case of China. In-dustrial Marketing Management, 35 (3), 394-402. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.006