___

• Bartholomew, S. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 241-266.
• Bonaccorsi, A. (2008). Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva, 46(3), 285-315. doi:10.1007/s11024-008-9101-3
• Bozkırlıoğlu, B. B. (2011). Who Interacts with Whom? Individual and Organizational Aspects of University-Industry Relations in Nanotechnology: The Turkish Case. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), ODTÜ/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Brettel, M. & Cleven, N. J. (2011). Innovation culture, collaboration with external partners and npd performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4), 253-272. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00617.x
• Castells, M. (2008). Enformasyon Çağı: Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür (Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi). E. Kılıç (Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
• Cesaroni, F. & Abbate, T. (2014). Market Orientation and Academic Spin-off Firms. INDEM.
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing innovation and change, 127(3), 34-41.
• Dahlman, C. (2007). Technology, globalization, and international competitiveness: Challenges for developing countries. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Ed.), Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development içinde (s. 29-84). New York: United Nations.
• Darvish, H. & Tonta, Y. (2016). Diffusion of nanotechnology knowledge in Turkey and its network structure. Scientometrics, 107(2), 569-592. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1854-0
• Day, G. S. & Schoemaker, P. J. (2000). Avoiding the pitfalls of emerging technologies. California management review, 42(2), 8-33.
• Derviş, H. (2014). Assessing the Dİffusion of Nanotechnology in Turkey: A Social Network Analysis Approach. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Edler, J., Fier, H. & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40(6), 791-805. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.003
• Erdil, E. (2011). Nanoteknoloji Alanında Uluslararası Düzeye Erişebilme Yolunda Üniversite-Sanayi İliskilerinin İncelenmesi. Retrieved from TÜBİTAK.
• Feng, H. I., Chen, C. S., Wang, C. H. & Chiang, H. C. (2012). The role of intellectual capital and university technology transfer offices in university-based technology transfer. The Service Industries Journal, 32(6), 899-917. doi:10.1080/02642069.2010.545883
• Fontana, R., Geuna, A. & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
• Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H. & Stern, S. (2000). When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Gaponenko, N. (2007). Building balanced and adoptive sectoral innovation system in nanotechnology to accelerate scientific & technological breakthroughs and improve human conditions. The Millennium Project, Washington.
• Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 203-215.
• Hsu, D. H. (2006). Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Science, 52(2), 204-219.
• Islam, N. & Miyazaki, K. (2009a). NanoSI: exploring nanotechnology research conflation and nano-innovation dynamism in the case of Japan. Science and Public Policy, 36(3), 170-182. doi:10.3152/030234209x427112
• Islam, N. & Miyazaki, K. (2009b). Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 128-140. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.021
• Islam, N. & Ozcan, S. (2013). Nanotechnology Innovation System: An empirical analysis of the emerging actors and collaborative networks. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(4), 687-703. doi:10.1109/tem.2013.2265352
• İşeri, M. (2001). Risk Sermayesi ve Türkiye'deki Geleceği. İstanbul: Türkmen.
• Kaiser, R. & Prange, H. (2004). The reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems—the example of German biotechnology. Research Policy, 33(3), 395-408. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.001
• Kang, K. H. & Kang, J. (2009). How do firms source external knowledge for innovation? Analysing effects of different knowledge sourcing methods. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(01), 1-17.
• Kim, J. & Marschke, G. (2005). Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision. RAND Journal of Economics, 298-317.
• Lee, S. & Bozeman, B. (2016). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359
• Lester, R. (2005). Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies. A Summary Report from the Local Innovation Systems Project - Phase I. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Industrial Performance Center, Working Paper Series.
• Lundvall, B. Å. (2005). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Dynamics of Industry and Innovatıon: Organızatıons, Networks and Systems, 95-119.
• Martin, B. R., Hicks, D. & Salter, A. (1996). The relationship between publicly funded basic research and economic performance: A SPRU review. UK: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
• Mehta, A., Herron, P., Motoyama, Y., Appelbaum, R. & Lenoir, T. (2012). Globalization and de-globalization in nanotechnology research: The role of China. Scientometrics, 93(2), 439-458. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0687-8
• Montobbio, F. & Sterzi, V. (2013). The globalization of technology in emerging markets: A gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. World Development, 44, 281-299. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.11.017
• Nieto, M. J. & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367-377.
• OECD. (1998). Technology, productivity and job creation: Best policy practices.
• OECD. (2009). Opportunities and risks of nanotechnologies.
• Oh, D., Kim, Y. & Ahn, H. (2010). An analysis of international cooperation in the public research and development programs of Korea. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 18(2), 43-67. doi:10.1080/19761597.2010.9668692
• Patel, P. & Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world's technology: an important case of "non-globalisation". Journal of International Business Studies, 1-21.
• Rasmussen, B. (2007). Is the commercialisation of nanotechnology different? A case study approach. Innovation, 9(1), 62-78.
• Remoe, S. & Guinet, J. (2002). Dynamising national innovation systems. OECD Publishing.
• Renn, O. & Roco, M. C. (2006). Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(2), 153-191.
• Roco, M. C. (2005). The emergence and policy implications of converging new technologies integrated from the nanoscale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(2-3), 129-143. doi:10.1007/s11051-005-3733-0
• Rotolo, D., Hicks, D. & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 44(10), 1827-1843. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006
• Shan, W. & Hamilton, W. (1991). Country-specific advantage and international cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 419-432.
• Shapira, P., Youtie, J. & Kay, L. (2011). National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(6), 587-604. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9212-0
• Steensma, H. K. & Lyles, M. A. (2000). Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 831-851. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<831::aid-smj123>3.0.co;2-h
• Wang, C.-H. & Chien, P.-Y. (2013). Exploring the nanotechnology alliances of nanotechnology firms: The roles of network position and technological uncertainty. Science, Technology and Society, 18(2), 139-164. doi:10.1177/0971721813489430
• Wang, J. (2007). Resource Spillover from Academia to High-tech Industry: Evidence from New Nanotechnology-Based Firms in the US. Georgia Institute of Technology.
• Williams, A. M., Baláž, V. & Wallace, C. (2004). International labour mobility and uneven regional development in Europe: Human capital, knowledge and entrepreneurship. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(1), 27-46.
• Wullweber, J. (2015). Innovation Policies and the Competition State: The Case of Nanotechnology. Kees van der Pijl (Ed.), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Production içinde (s. 43-58). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. & Armstrong, J. S. (2002a). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153.
• Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Furner, J., Liu, R. C. & Ma, H. (2007). Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy, 36(6), 850-863.
• Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. & Torero, M. (2002b). Labor mobility from academe to commerce. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 629-660.
• http://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/nano-size (Erişim Tarihi: 18.07.2017)
• https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=100602 (Erişim Tarihi: 04.01.2018)
• http://statnano.com (Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2017)
• https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=192 (Erişim Tarihi: 24.07.2017)
• https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=399 (Erişim Tarihi: 07.10.2016)