Örgütsel Öğrenme Yeteneği ile Örgütsel Yenilik Arasındaki İlişki: Tekstil Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Günümüzde işletmeler küreselleşme ile birlikte ortaya çıkan hızlı değişim ve gelişmeler karşısında hayatta kalma mücadelesi vermektedir. İşletmelerin uzun dönemli başarı sağlayabilmeleri için örgütsel öğrenme yeteneği ve örgütsel yenilik kritik rollere sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı örgütsel öğrenme yeteneği ile örgütsel yenilik çeşitleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın uygulama yeri ve örneklemi; Bursa Sanayi ve Ticaret Odasına üye tekstil ürünleri imalatı gerçekleştiren işletmelerde incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmada ölçüm araçlarının güvenilirlikleri için alfa katsayıları hesaplanmış, faktör analizine tabi tutulmuş teoriye uyumlu sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Araştırmaya ait hipotezlerin test edilmesinde korelasyon ve regresyon analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre örgütsel öğrenme yeteneği ve örgütsel yeniliğin her bir çeşidi arasında anlamlı ve pozitif yönde bir ilişki vardır. Örgütsel yenilik boyutlarındaki değişimi anlamlı bir şekilde açıklayan örgütsel öğrenme yeteneği boyutları her bir örgütsel yenilik boyutu için farklılaşmaktadır.

The Relation Between Organizational Learning Capacity and Organizational Innovation: A research on Textile Sector

Today’s businesses are struggling to survive against rapid changes and advancements resulting from globalization. Organizational learning capacity and organizational innovation have crucial roles for the businesses to be successful in a long-term. In this study, the relations between organizational learning capacity and the types of organizational innovation will be investigated at the businesses manufacturing textile goods as a member of The Chamber of Bursa Industry and Commerce. For the reliability of measurement tools, the alpha coefficient has been calculated and the results have been obtained in conformity with the theory through factor analysis. The methods of correlation and regression analysis were used to test the hypothesis belonging to the research. According to the research results, there are significant and positive relations among the each type of organizational learning capacity and organizational innovation. According to multiple regression analysis, for every type of organizational innovation, the combinations of organizational learning capability dimensions are different

___

  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley Pub. Comp., Mass.
  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II- theory, Method and Practise. Addison-Wesley Pub. Comp., New York.
  • Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: Integrating and extending models of organizational performance. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 9(4), 295-308.
  • Bartell, S. M. (2001). Training's new role in learning organizations. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(4), 354-355.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi yönetimi. Kariyer Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Bolívar-Ramos, M. T., García-Morales, V. J., & García- Sánchez, E. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331-357.
  • Bozfakıoğlu, B. T. (2009). Örgütsel öğrenme yeteneği-örgütsel yenilik ilişkileri ve Türk işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, T. & Y. Zhao (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(1), 515-524.
  • Chiva, R., Ghauri, P., & Alegre, J. (2014). Organizational learning, innovation and internationalization: A complex system model. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 687-705.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta- analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 556-557.
  • Dixon, N. (1997). The hallways of learning. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4), 52.
  • Dolanay, S. (2009). Schumpeter sisteminde yenilikler, ekonomik gelişme ve devresel hareketler. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1(2), 171-188.
  • Fang, C. H., Chang, S. T., & Chen, G. L. (2011). Organizational learning capability and organizational innovation: The moderating role of knowledge inertia. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1864-1870.
  • Geus, A. P. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, 66(2).
  • Goh, S. C. (2003). Improving organizational learning capability: Lessons from two case studies. The Learning Organization, 10(4-5), 216-227.
  • Goh, S. C., Elliott, C., & Quon, T. K. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance: A meta-analytic examination. The Learning Organization, 19(2), 92-108.
  • Gomez, P. J., Lorente, J. C. & Cabrera, R. V. (2004). Training practices and organisational learning capability: Relationship and implications. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(2-4), 234-256.
  • Gomez, P. J., Lorente, J. C. & Cabrera, R. V. (2005). Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58, 715-725.
  • Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 72-84.
  • Hsiao, H. C., & Chang, J. C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621- 631.
  • Hult, M., Tomas, G. & Ferrell, O. C. (1997). Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: Construct and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 40, 97- 111.
  • Hurley, R. F., Tomas, G. & Hult, M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42- 54.
  • Hurley, R. F. (2015). Market orientation, learning and innovation. In Proceedings of the 1997 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 212- 215). Springer International Publishing.
  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417.
  • Jimenéz-Jimenéz, D., Martínez-Costa, M., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2014). Innovation, organizational learning orientation and reverse knowledge transfer in multinationals companies. Management, 12(1).
  • Kimberly, J. R. & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713.
  • Koçel, T. (1993). İşletme yöneticiliği. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Montuori, L. A. (2000). Organizational longevity: Integrating systems thinking, learning and conceptual complexity. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1), 61-73.
  • Neely, A., Filippini, R., Forza, C., Vinelli, A. & Hii, J. (2001). A framework for analysing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors: Perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 114-124.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14-37.
  • OECD, Oslo Manual (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3.bs, OECD/European Communities, Paris.
  • Pınar, İ. (2002). İşletmelerde yenilik kıyaslamaları: İstanbul sanayi odasına bağlı otomotiv sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin analizi. 10. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi.
  • Pınar, İ. (1999). Öğrenen organizasyonların kültürel çerçevesi. İ.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 37-78.
  • Pınar, İ. (2006). Değişim yönetimi anlayışı olarak öğrenen organizasyonlar. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(25), 29-42.
  • Pınar, İ. (2007). Öğrenen organizasyonların yapısal özellikleri. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(27), 103-114.
  • Poell, R. F., Dam, K.V. ve Van Den Berg, P.T. (2004). Organising learning in work contexts, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4): 529-540.
  • Schwarz, R. (2002). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches. 2. bs, Jossey-Bass.
  • Senge, P. M. (1991). Learning organizations. Executive Excellence, 8(9), 7-8.
  • Senge, P. M. (2004). Beşinci disiplin-öğrenen organizasyon düşünüşü ve uygulaması. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Slappendel, C. (1996). Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 17(1), 107-129.
  • Slater, S., John, F. & Narver, C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59, 63- 74.
  • Smith, A. W. (1997). Leadership is a living system: Learning leaders and organizations. Human Systems Management, 16(4), 277-284.
  • Starkey, K. (1998). What can we learn from the learning organization. Human Relations, 51(4), 532.
  • Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R. & Snyder, C. A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 175-218.
  • TUİK, (2015). Türkiye istatistik kurumu. http://www.tuik.gov.tr (Erişim tarihi: 28.09.2015)
  • TÜSİAD, (2003). Ulusal İnovasyon Sistemi, TÜSİAD, İstanbul. http://www.tusiad.org/__rsc/shared/file/ulusal.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 01.11.2014)
  • Ulrich, D., Jick, T. & Glinow, M. A. V. (1993). High-impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capability. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 52-66.
  • Uzkurt, C. (2008). Yenilik yönetimi ve yenilikçi örgüt kültürü. Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Wignaraja, G. (2012). Innovation, learning, and exporting in China: Does R&D or a technology index matter?. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(3), 224-233.
  • Yazıcı, S. (2001). Öğrenen organizasyonlar. Alfa Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Yeo, R. K. (2005). Revisiting the roots of learning organization: A synthesis of the learning organization literature. The Learning Organization, 12(1).