Kent Müzeleri ve Küreselleşme

Kent müzesi müzecilik alanında son on yıllık süreçte tartışılmaya başlanan yeni bir konudur. Bu tartışmalarda müzenin kentsel çevreyle ve kent yaşamıyla ilişkisi, kent-toplum-müze ilişkisi ve değişen kent ve toplum öne çıkan konulardır. Bu bağlamda değişen kent küreselleş-me kavramı etrafında ele alınmaktadır. Literatürde küreselleşmenin bugünün kentlerine ve toplumlarına etkisi üzerine çeşitli görüşler sunulmaktadır. Kimi yaklaşımlarda küreselleşme olumsuz bir normalleşme süreci olarak ele alınırken, bazı görüşler de küreselleşmenin gelişti-rici bir süreç olduğu yönündedir. Her ne kadar küreselleşme ile ilgili çeşitli görüşler öne sürülse de, küreselleşme, kent ve kent müzesi ilişkisi hakkında ortak bir yaklaşım ön plana çıkmaktadır: kent müzesi geçmişin, bugünün ve geleceğin analojik etkileşimini sergilemelidir.

City Museums and Globalization

City museum is a new issue in museology, which has been discussed for a decade. Important discussions have been carried out about the museum and its relationship to the urban envi-ronment and urban life, the relationship between the city, society and the museum, and the changing city and society. The changing city is considered in the context of globalization. In the literature, there are several ideas about the relationship between globalization and its impacts on today’s cities and societies. On the one hand, globalization is discussed as a nega-tive normalizing process; and on the other hand, it is considered a process of development. Although there are different thoughts on globalization, there is a common approach to the relationship between globalization, city and the city museum, which is that the city museum should display the analogous relationship with the past, present and future.

___

  • CAMOC. (2005a). In 05.02.2012, retrieved from: http://camoc.icom.museum/about/index.php
  • CAMOC. (2005b). In 05.02.2012, retrieved from: http://camoc.icom.museum/index2.php
  • Gorbacheva, T. (2006). The city museum and its values. Museum International 231, 58(3), 50-54.
  • Jameson, F. (1998). Notes on globalization as a philosophical issue. F. Jameson and M. Miyoshi (Ed.). In the cultures of globalization (pp. 54-77). Durham; London: Duke University Press.
  • Lohman, J. (2006). City Museums: do we have a role in shaping the global communi-ty? Museum International 231, 58(3), 15-20. Lohman, J. (2008). The Prospect of a city museum. I. Jones, R. R. Macdonald et al. (Ed.). In city museums and city development (pp. 60-74). Lanham; New York; Toron-to; Plymouth: AltaMira.
  • Prévélakis, G. (2008). City museums and the geopolitics of globalization. I. Jones, R. R. Macdonald et al. (Ed.). In city museums and city development (pp. 16-26). Lan-ham; New York; Toronto; Plymouth: AltaMira.
  • Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-Space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. M. Featherstone, S. Lash and R. Robertson (Ed.). In global modernities (pp. 25-44). London; California; New Delhi: Sage.
  • UNESCO (2002). Universal declaration on cultural diversity, report for the world summit on sustainable development. New York: United Nations. In 05.02.2012, retrieved
  • from:http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/documents/summit_docs/131302_wssd_report_reissued.pdf