___

• Dağdeviren, M., ve Eren, T., “Analytical
• Hierarchy Process and Use of 0-1 Goal
• Programming Methods in Selecting Supplier
• Firm”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ.,16 , 2, 41-
• , 2001.
• Kralawski, A., Pedrycz W., ve Nyström L.,
• “Fuzzy Neural Network as Instance Generator for
• Case-Based Reasoning System: An Example of
• Selection of Heat Exchange Equipment in Mixing
• Tanks”, Neural Computing & Applications, 8,
• –113, 1999.
• Kulak, O., Durmuşoglu, M. B., ve Kahraman, C.,
• “Fuzzy multiattribute equipment selection based
• on information axiom”, Journal of Materials
• Processing Technology, 169, 337–345, 2005.
• Dağdeviren, M., “Decision making in equipment
• selection: an ıntegrated approach with AHP and
• PROMETHEE”, Journal of Intelligent
• Manufacturing, 19, 397-406, 2008.
• Ayağ, Z., ve Özdemir, R. G., “A fuzzy AHP
• approach to evaluating machine tool
• alternatives”, Journal of Intelligent
• Manufacturing, 17, 179–190, 2006.
• Başçetin, A., ve Kesimal, A., “A new approach in
• selection of loading-hauling systems in surface
• mining”, 16th Mining Congress of Turkey,
• ISBN 975-395-310-0, 1999.
• Başçetin, A., “A decision support system for
• optimal equipment selection in open pit mining:
• Analytical Hierarchy Process”, İstanbul Üniv.
• Müh. Fak. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 16, 2, 1-11,
• -
• Chan, F. T. S., Ip, R. W. L., ve Lau, H.,
• “Integration of expert system with analytic
• hierarchy process for the design of material
• handling equipment selection system”, Journal
• of Materials Processing Technology, 116, 137–
• , 2001.
• Manassero, G., Semeraro Q., ve Tolio T., “A new
• method to cope with decision makers' uncertainty
• in the equipment selection process”, CIRP
• Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 53, 1,
• -392, 2004.
• Chakraborty, S., ve Banik, D., “Design of a
• material handling equipment selection model
• using Analytical Hierarchy Process”, International Journal of Advanced
• Manufacturing Technologies, 28, 1237-1245,
• -
• İç, Y. T., ve Yurdakul, M., “Decision support
• system for selection of machining centers”, J.
• Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ, 23, 1, 85-95, 2008.
• Decision Lab, 1.01.0388, copyright © 1998-2000,
• Visual Decision Inc., Canada.
• .
• Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process,
• McGraw- Hill International Book Company,
• USA,1980.
• Schniederjans, M. J., ve Wilson, R.L., “Using the
• Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal
• Programming- for Information System Project
• Selection”, Information & Management, 20, 5,
• -342, 1991.
• Suresh, N.C., ve Kaparthi, S., “Flexible
• AutomationInvestments: A Synthesis of Two
• Multi-Objective Modeling Approaches”,
• Computers & Industrial Engineering, 22, 3,
• -272, 1992.
• Ehie, I.C., ve Benjamin, C.O., “An Integrated
• Multiobjective Planning Model: A Case Study Of
• The Zambian Copper Mining Industry”,
• European J. of Operational Research, 68, 2,
• -172, 1993.
• Myint, S., ve Tabucanon, M.T., “A Multiple-
• Criteria Approach to Machine Selection for
• Flexible Manufacturing Systems”, International
• Journal of Production Economics, 33, 1-3, 121-
• , 1994.
• Ramanathan, R., ve Ganesh, L. S., “Energy
• Alternatives for Lighting in Households: An
• Evaluation Using An Integrated Goal
• Programming-AHP Model”, Energy, 20, 1, 63-
• , 1995.
• Ramanathan, R. ve Ganesh, L. S., “Energy
• Resource Allocation Incorporating Qualitative
• and Quantitative Criteria: An Integrated Model
• Using Goal Programming And AHP”, Socio-
• Economic Planning Sciences, 29, 3, 197-218,
• -
• Schniederjans, M.J., ve Garvin, T., “Using the
• Analytic Hierarchy Process and Multi-Objective
• Programming for the Selection of Cost Drivers in
• Activity-Based Costing”, European Journal of
• Operational Research, 100, 1, 72-80, 1997.
• Badri, M. A., “Combining the Analytic Hierarchy
• Process and Goal Programming for Global
• Facility Location-Allocation Problem”,
• International J. of Production Economics, 62,
• , 237-248, 1999.
• Badri, M. A., “A Combined AHP–GP Model for
• Quality Control Systems”, International
• Journal of Production Economics, 72, 1, 27-40,
• -
• Bowen, W.M., “Subjective Judgements and Data
• Envelopment Analysis in Site Selection”,
• Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,
• , 2, 133-144, 1990.
• Shang, J., ve Sueyoshi, T., “A Unified
• Framework for the Selection of a Flexible
• Manufacturing System”, European Journal of
• Operational Research, 85, 2, 297-315, 1995.
• Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A. ve Hadad, Y., “An
• AHP/DEA Methodology for Ranking Decision
• Making Units”, International Transactions in
• Operational Research, 7, 2, 109-124, 2000.
• Yang, T., ve Kuo, C., “A Hierarchical AHP/DEA
• Methodology for the Facilities Layout Design
• Problem”, European Journal of Operational
• Research, 147, 1, 128-136, 2003.
• Mon, D., Cheng, C. ve Lin, J., “Evaluating
• Weapon System Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy
• Process Based on Entropy Weight”, Fuzzy Sets
• and Systems, 62, 2, 127-134, 1994.
• Chang, D., “Applications of the Extent Analysis
• Method on Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of
• Operational Research, 95, 3, 649-655, 1996.
• Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H., ve Rüenauver,
• E., “Evaluating Alternative Production Cycles
• Using the Extended Fuzzy AHP Method”,
• European Journal of perational Research, 100,
• , 351- 366, 1997.
• Zhu, K., Jing, Y., ve Chang, D., “A Discussion
• on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of
• Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational
• Research, 116, 2, 450-456, 1999.
• Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C. ve Kao, S. S., “A Decision
• Support System for Locating Convenience Store
• Through Fuzzy AHP”, Computers & Industrial
• Engineering, 37, 1-2, 323-326, 1999.
• Leung, L. C. ve Cao, D., “On Consistency and
• Ranking of Alternatives in Fuzzy AHP”,
• European Journal of Operational Research,
• , 1, 102- 113, 2000.
• Yu, C.S., “A GP-AHP Method for Solving Group
• Decision-Making Fuzzy AHP Problems”,
• Computers & Operations Research, 29, 14,
• -2001, 2002.
• Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C. ve Ruan, D., “Fuzzy
• Group Decision Making for Selection Among
• Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems”,
• Computers in Industry, 51, 1, 13-29, 2003.
• Kahraman, C., Ruan, D. ve Doğan, I., “Fuzzy
• Group Decision-Making for Facility Location
• Selection”, Information Sciences, 157, 135-153,
• -
• Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. ve Ruan, D., “Multi-
• Attribute Comparison of Catering Service
• Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of
• Turkey”, Int. Journal Production Economics,
• , 171-184, 2004.
• Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C. Ve
• Ruan, D., “Determining the Importance Weights
• for the Design Requirements in the House of
• Quality Using the Fuzzy Analytic Network Approach”, International Journal of Intelligent
• Systems, 19, 443-461, 2004.
• Kulak, O. ve Kahraman, C., “Fuzzy Multi-
• Attribute Selection Among Transportation
• Companies Using Axiomatic Design and
• Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Information
• Sciences, 170, 191-210, 2005.
• Tolga, E., Demircan, M.L. ve Kahraman, C.,
• “Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy
• Replacement Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy
• Process”, Int. J. of Production Economics, 97,
• -117, 2005.
• Dağdeviren, M., Akay, D., Çetinyokus, T. ve
• Kurt, M., “Bulanık Matematiksel Programlama
• Teknigi İle Bir İş Değerlendirme Uygulaması”,
• Teknoloji Z.K.Ü. Karabük Teknik Eğitim
• Fakültesi Dergisi, 5, 1-2,91-96,2002.
• Dağdeviren, M., Yüksel, İ., “Developing a Fuzzy
• Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for
• Behaviour Based Safety Management”,
• Information Sciences, 178, 6, 1717-1733, 2008.
• Saaty, T.,”The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic
• Network Processes”, MCDM XV-th Int. Conf.,
• Ankara, Turkey, 2000.
• Tam, M.C.Y. ve Tummala, V.M.R., ”An
• Application of the AHP in Vendor Selection of a
• Telecommunications System” The Int. J. of
• Management Science, 29, 2, 171-182, 2001.
• Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process for
• Decision Making, Kobe, Japan, 1999.
• Saaty, T., Fundamentals of Decision Making
• and Priority Theory, RWS Publications,
• Pittsburgh, USA, 2000.
• Brans, J. P., ve Vincke, P. H., “A preference
• ranking organization method”, Management
• Science, 31, 647-656, 1985.
• Brans, J. P., Vincke, P. H., ve Mareschall, B.,
• “How to select and how to rank projects: The
• PROMETHEE method”, European Journal of
• Operational Research, 14, 228-238, 1986.
• Goumas, M., ve Lygerou, V., “An extension of
• the PROMETHEE method for decision making in
• fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy
• exploitation projects”, European Journal of
• Operational Research, 123, 606-613, 2000.
• Geldermann J., Spengler, T., ve Rentz, O.,
• “Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment.
• Case study: Iron and steel making industry”,
• Fuzzy Set Systems, 115, 45– 65, 2000.
• Le Téno, J., F., ve Mareschal, B., “An interval
• version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of
• building products’ design with ill-defined data on
• environmental quality”, Eur Journal of
• Operational Research, 109, 522–529, 1998.
• Bilsel, R., U., Büyüközkan, G., ve Ruan, D., “A
• fuzzy prefernce-ranking model for a quality
• evaluation of hospital web sites”, International
• Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21, 1181-1197,
• -
• Briggs, Th., Kunsch, P.L., ve Mareschal, B.,
• “Nuclear waste management: An application of
• the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods”,
• European Journal of Operational Research,
• , 110, 1990.
• Chou, W. C., Lin, W. T., ve Lin, C. Y.,
• “Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE
• technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology
• method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir
• Watershed, Taiwan”, Ecological Engineering,
• , 269–280, 2007.
• Queiruga, D., Walther, G., Gonza’lez-Benito, J.,
• ve Spengler, T., “Evaluation of sites for
• thelocation of WEEE recycling plants in Spain”,
• Waste Management, 28, 1, 181–190, 2008.
• D’Avignon, G., ve Mareschal, B., “An
• application of the PROMETHEE and GAIA
• methods”, Mathematical and Computer
• Modelling, 12, (10–11), 1393–1400, 1989.
• Du Bois, Ph., Brans, J.P., Cantraine, F., ve
• Mareschal, B., “MEDICIS: An expert system for
• computer-aided diagnosis using the
• PROMETHEE multicriteria method”, European
• Journal of Operational Research, 39, 284–292,
• -
• Olson, D.L., “Comparison of three multicriteria
• methods to predict known outcomes”, European
• Journal of Operational Research, 130, 3, 576–
• , 2001.
• Rekiek, B., de Lit, P., ve Delchambre, A., “Hybrid
• assembly line design and user’s preferences”,
• International Journal of Production Research,
• , 5, 1095–1111, 2002.
• Baourakis, G., Doumpos, M., Kalogeras, N., ve
• Zopounidis, C., “Multicriteria analysis and
• assessment of financial viability of
• agribusinesses: The case of marketing cooperatives
• and juice-producing companies”,
• Agribusiness, 18, 4, 543–558, 2002.
• Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K., ve Esfahanipour,
• A., “Decision making in stock trading: An
• application of PROMETHEE”, European
• Journal of Operational Research, 177, 673–683,
• -
• Hyde, K., Maier, H., ve Colby, C., “Incorporating
• uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA
• method”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision
• Analysis, 12, 245–259, 2003.
• Albadvi, A., “Formulating national information
• technology strategies: A preference ranking
• model using PROMETHEE method”, European
• Journal of Operational Research, 153, 290–
• , 2004.
• Johnson, M.P., “Spatial decision support for
• assisted housing mobility counseling”, Decision
• Support Systems, 41, 296–312, 2005.
• Zhang, G., Ni, Y., Churchill, J., ve Kokot, S.,
• “Authentication of vegetable oils on the basis of
• their physico-chemical properties with the aid of
• chemometrics”, Talanta, 70, 293–300, 2006.
• Iniestra, J. G., ve Gutiérrez, J.G., “Multicriteria
• decisions on interdependent infrastructure
• transportation projects using an evolutionarybased
• framework”, Applied Soft Computing, 9,
• –52, 2009.
• Mohamadabadi, H., S., Tichkowsky, G., ve
• Kumar, A., “Development of a multicriteria
• assesment model for ranking of renewable and
• non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles”,
• Energy, 34, 112-125, 2009.
• Brans, J. P., ve Mareschall, B., “The PROMCALC
• & GAIA decision support system for multi-criteria
• decision aid”, Decision Support Systems, 12,
• -310, 1994.
• Ballı, S., Karasulu, B., ve Korukoğlu, S., “En
• uygun otomobil seçimi problemi için bir bulanık
• PROMETHEE yöntemi uygulaması”,
• D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 22, 1, 139-147, 2007.
• DuBois D., ve Prade H., “Operations on fuzzy
• numbers”, Int J Syst Sci, 9, 613– 626, 1978.
• Brans, J. P., ve Mareschal, B., “How to decide
• with PROMETHEE”, Visual Decision Inc.,
• Montreal, Canada,
• http://www.visualdecision.com, 1998.
• Wang, J. J., ve Yang, D. L., “Using a hybrid
• multi-criteria decision aid method for information
• systems outsourcing”, Computers & Operation
• Research, 34, 3691-3700.