JOHN M. ZIMAN’DA “KAMUSAL BİLGİ” YA DA “BİLİM”

Bilimin amacı anlamadır; veri toplamak ya da formül bulmak değildir. Geleneksel bilim felsefeleri bilimdeki usdışı, psikolojik, sosyolojik ve felsefi unsurları bilimden uzaklaştırmaya ve ayıklamaya çabalamışlardır; halbuki asıl olan bilimdeki bu boyutların da hesaba katılmasıdır. Bilimsel bilgi, onu üretenler insanlar oldukları için hiç mi hiç nesnel değildir. Bilim insanlar tarafından insanlar için yapılır; şu halde, bilimde peşin hükümler her zaman söz konusudur ve bilim sağın mantıkla değil kişisel yargıla da bulunularak geçerli kılınır. Bilim maddi çıkarlara, tarihsel deneyime, kültürel geleneklere ve onu yapanların toplumsal ilişkilerine de tabidir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Usdışı unsurlar, bilimsel bilgi, nesnel, peşin hükümler, kültürel gelenekler, toplumsal ilişkiler

“Public Knowledge” or “Science” in John M. Ziman

The goal of science is to understand not to gather data or to get at formulas. Traditional philosophies of sciences have made attempts to keep the irrational, psychological, sociological and philosophical elements out of science and to reject them; whereas, the most important thing is to take into consideration these dimensions of science. Scientific knowledge, which is produced by men of letters, is never ever objective. Science is done by men of science for the sake of human beings; thus preconceived ideas are always dominant in science and so science is validated not by sound logic but by personal judgments. Science is also subject to the material interests, historical experience, cultural traditions and social relations of scientist doing it

Keywords:

Irrational elements, scientific knowledge, objective, preconceived ideas, cultural traditions, social relations,

PDF

___

BOCHENSKI, J.M. The Methods of Contemporary Thought, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1968
ZIMAN, J.M., Real Science, what it is and what it means, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, s.102.
BOCHENSKI, J.M. Çağdaş Düşünme Yöntemleri, (Çev. Talip kabadayı- Mustafa Irmak), Ankara: BilgeSu Yayıncılık, 2008
BRODY, Baruch A. (Ed.). Readings in The Philosophy of Science, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1970
KABADAYI, Talip. “Kuramdan Bağımsız Gözlem ve Deney Dili
Olanaklı mıdır?” FLSF Dergisi, Sayı-2, Güz, ss.29-43, 2006
KABADAYI, Talip. “'Bilim' Tasarımlarının Kısa Tarihi”, FLSF Dergisi, Sayı-3, Bahar, ss. 1.-26, 2007
KABADAYI, Talip. “The Second Verificationists”, EJER, 7, 29, ss. 35- 43, 2007
KABADAYI, Talip. “Larry Laudan'da ‘Araştırma Gelenekleri’nin Yöntembilgisi”, FLSF Dergisi, Sayı-5, Bahar, s. 7-34, 2008
KUHN, Thomas S. The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970
KUHN, Thomas S. The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977
LAUDAN, Larry. Progress and Its Problems, Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977
LAUDAN, Larry. Science and Hypothesis, London: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981
LAUDAN, Larry. Science and Values, The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984
LAUDAN, Larry. Beyond Positivism and Relativism, Theory, Method and Evidence, Boulder: Westview Press, 1996
O’HEAR, Anthony. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990
ZIMAN, J.M., Public Knowledge, an essay concerning the social dimension of science, London: Cambridge University Press, 1968
ZIMAN, J.M., Reliable Knowledge, an exploration of the grounds for belief in science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978
ZIMAN, J.M., Teaching and Learning about Science and Society, London: Cambridge University Press, 1980
ZIMAN, J.M., An Introduction to Science Studies, the philosophical and social aspects of science and technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984
ZIMAN, J.M., Prometheus Bound, science in a dynamic steady state, Cambridge University Press, 1994
ZIMAN, J.M., Real Science, what it is and what it means, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000