İki Tilmikosin Preparatının Koyunlarda Biyoeşdeğerliği

DOI: 10.26650/experimed.2019.19005Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, tilmikosin fosfat içeren bir jenerik ürünün orijinal preparata biyoeşdeğerliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 20 adet Kıvırcık ırkı sağlıklı koyuna tek doz (10 mg/kg, s.c.) çapraz tasarım esasına göre orijinal ve jenerik ürün uygulandı. 0. dakika ve uygulama sonrasında 15., 30. dakika ile 1.,2., 3., 4., 6., 8., 12., 24., 48., 72. ve 96. saatlerde kan örnekleri toplandı. Serum tilmikosin düzeyleri, ekstraksiyon işlemini takiben yüksek basınçlı likit kromatografisi (HPLC) ile ölçüldü. Farmakokinetik parametreler non-kompartmantal model analizi kullanılarak hesaplandı. Biyoeşdeğerlik değerlendirilmesinde EAA(0-72) ve Cmax parametreleri temel alındı. Biyoeşdeğerlik kriteri EAA %80-125 (%90 güven aralığı) olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Orijinal ilaca kıyasla jenerik ilacın EAA(0-72) oranı % 105,7; Cmax oranı ise %106,6 olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, iki ürünün biyoeşdeğer olduğu ve endike oldukları alanlarda birbirlerinin yerine kullanabilecekleri söylenebilir.Cite this article as: Şahin E, Yıldırım M. Bioequivalence in the Sheep of Two Tilmicosin Preparations. Experimed 2019; 9(1): 28-31.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Biyoeşdeğerlik, koyun, tilmikosin fosfat

Bioequivalence in the Sheep of Two Tilmicosin Preparations

DOI: 10.26650/experimed.2019.19005Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic product containing tilmicosin phosphate in comparison to the original preparation. Material and Method: The original and generic products were applied to 20 healthy Kıvırcık sheep at a single dose (10 mg/kg, s.c.) according to a cross- over design. Blood samples were taken before and at 15 and 30th minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96th hours following injections. The serum concentrations of tilmicosin were measured by high pressure liquid chormatography (HPLC) following extraction process. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental model analysis. AUC (0-72) and Cmax were based basis for evaluation of bioequivalence. The bioequivalence criterion was AUC 80-125 % (90 % confidence interval).Result: Compared to the original product, AUC (0-72) of the generic product was 105,7% and the Cmax was 106,6%. Conclusion: It is concluded that the two products are bioequivalent and could be used interchangeably in conditions where they are indicated. Cite this article as: Şahin E, Yıldırım M. Bioequivalence in the Sheep of Two Tilmicosin Preparations. Experimed 2019; 9(1): 28-31.

Keywords:

Bioequivalence, sheep, tilmicosin phosphate,

PDF

___

1. Avcı T (2010): Sığırlarda Parenteral yolla uygulanan bazı makrolid grubu antibiyotiklerin sütteki seviyelerinin Belirlenmesi. (Doktora Tezi) s.29. 2. Caoa X-Y, Dongb M, Shen J-Z et al. Tilmicosin and tylosin have anti-inflammatory properties via modulation of COX-2 and iNOS gene expression and production of cytokines in LPS-induced macrophages and monocytes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006; 27: 431-8. 3. §EMEA (2001): Note for Guıdance on the investigation of bioavailability and Bioequivalence. Londra Committee for proprietary medicinal product (CPMP). 4. EMEA (2010). Guideline on the conduct of bioequivalence studies for veterinary medicinal products. Draft. Londra. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use. 5. FAO (2006): Guidance for Industry Bioequivalence Guidance. U.S.A. Center for veterinary Medicine (CVM). 6. FDA (2005): Micotil 300. Freedom of information summary Supplemental New Animal Drug Application NADA 140-929. 7. Giguère S. (2006). Macrolides, Azalides, and Ketolides. 191-206. In: Prescott JF (Ed), Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. Blackwell Publishing, US. 8. Kaya S. (2002). Makrolidler. 335-343. In: Kaya S, Pirinçci İ, Bilgili A (Ed), Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakoloji. Ankara Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara. 9. Lakritz J, Tyler JW, Marsh A, et al. Tilmicosin reduces lipopolysaccharide-stimulated bovine alveolar macrophage prostaglandin E(2) production via a mechanism involving phospholipases. Vet Ther 2002; 3: 7-21. 10. McNeil FD. Tilmicosin. Food &Drug Administration www.fao.org/docrep/w4601e/w4601e0e.html (10.04.2008). 11. Modric, S, Webb AI, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tilmicosin in sheep and cattle. J Vet Pharmacol Therap 1998; 21: 444-52. 12. Moran JW, Turner JM, Coleman MR. Determination of tilmicosin in Bovine and Porcine Sera by Liquid Chromatography. J AOAC Int 1997; 80: 1183-9. 13. Naccari F, Giofre F, Pellegrino M, et al. Effectiveness and kinetic behavior of tilmicosin in the treatment of respiratory infections in sheep. Vet Rec 2001: 148; 773-6. 14. Ramadan A. Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin in serum and milk of goats. Res Vet Sci 1997: 62; 48-50. 15. Rui P, Shen J, Li J, et al. The Pharmacokinetics of Tilmicosin administrated Intravenously and Subcutaneously in Healthy Sheep. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 2005: 36; 296-300. 16. Shen J, Li C, Jiang H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin after oral administration in swine. AJVR 2005: 66; 1071-4. 17. Tountain PL, Koritz GD. Veterinary drug bioequivalence determination. J. Vet Pharmacol Therap 1997; 20: 79-90. 18. Zhang J, Li J, Miao X, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Tilmicosin in Sheep. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 2004: 35; 560-4.