ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ

Bu çalışma, 1970-2009 yılları arası, Pedroni ve Johansen ve Fisher panel veri eş bütünleşme analizi kullanılarak Asya ülkelerinde kültürel benzerlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmıştır. Eş bütünleşme analizi, Asya ülkelerinde, kültü- rel benzerlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasında, uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin var olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu durum, uzun dönemde kültürel yakınlığın uluslararası ticareti etkilediği anlamına gelmektedir.

-

This study investigates the relationship between culture proximity and international trade in Asia, covering the period 1970-2009 using Pedroni and Johansen and Fisher Panel Data cointegration tests. The result of the cointegration analysis indicates that there is a long-run relationship between culture and and international trade. This means cultural proximity/similarity effects the international trade in long run

___

  • Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Balaam David N., Bradford Dillman (2013). Introduction to International Political Economy, 6th Edition,
  • Beckerman, W. “Distance and The Pattern of Intra-European Trade”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956, 38:31-40.
  • Boyd, Robert and Richerson, P. (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.
  • Breitung J., “The local power of some unit root tests for panel data”, Advances in Econometrics, 2000, 15, 161-177.
  • Coase, Ronald , “The Nature of The Firm”, Economica, 1937 Vol. 4, No. 16, 386-405.
  • Combes, Pierre-Philippe, Miren Lafourcade Thierry Mayer, “The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France”, Journal of International Economics, 2004 66, pp.1 –29.
  • Cyrus, Teresa L., “Cultural Distance and Bilateral Trade”, Global Economy Journal. 2011, Volume 12, Issue 4. Dreher, A “Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization”. Applied Economics, 2007 ,vol. 38, No.10, pp. 1091-1110.
  • Dreher, Axel, Martin Gassebner, Lars-H. R. Siemers, “Globalization, Economic Freedom, and Human Rights” 2012 The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 56, No. 3 (June 2012), pp. 516-546.
  • Felbermayr, Gabriel J., Toubal F., “Cultural proximity and trade”, European Economic Review, 2010 Volume 54, Issue 2, 279–293.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E., Wei, S.-J., Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Institute for International Economics, 1997, Washington DC.
  • Gert-Jan M. Linders Arjen Slangen Henri L.F. de Groot Sjoerd Beugelsdijk “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074/3
  • Glaeser, Edward, David Laibson, and Bruce Sacerdote (2002), “An Economic Approach to Social Capital,” Economic Journal, 2002, 112: 437-458.
  • Granger, C.W.J., ve Newbold, P., “Spurious Regression in Economics”, Journal of Econometrics, 1974, vol. 2, Issue 2, 111-120
  • Greif, Avner , Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy, 2006, Cambridge.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., “Does culture affect economic outcomes”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20 (2), 23–48.
  • Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales, “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009, 124 (3), 1095-1131.
  • Guo, Rongxing, ”How culture influences foreign trade: evidence from the U.S. and China”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004, 33, 785–812.
  • Hadri, K., “Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data”, Econometrics Journal, 2000, 3, 148-161.
  • Helliwell, J. F. “National borders, trade and migration”, NBER Working Paper, 1997, 6027, NBER.
  • Henrich, Joseph, “Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon”, American Economic Review, 2000, Vol. 90, No. 4 pp. 973-979.
  • Henrich, Joseph Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colın Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gıntıs, And Rıchard Mcelreath (2001), “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies”, The American Economic Review, 2001, 91 (2), 73-78.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations, Across Nations, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hou, Liyan, Explaining trade flows and determinants of bilaterial trade. Ph.D. thesis, 2010, University of Birmingham.
  • Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shın, Y., “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 2003, 115, 53-74.
  • Jones, Eric L. (2006) Cultures Merging: A Historical and Economic Critique of Culture, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Kunovich Robert M., “The Sources and Consequences of National Identification”, American Sociological Review, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 573-593.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C-F., Chu, C-S. J., “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finitesample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 2002, 108, 1-24.
  • Linder, Staffan Burenstam (1961), An Essay on Trade and Transformation, John Wiley& Sons, New York.
  • Linders, Gert-Jon, Argen Slangen, Henri L.F. De. Groot , “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074.
  • Pedroni P., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 1999, 0305-9049.
  • Pejovich, Svetozar, “Economic Analysis of Institutions and Systems”, International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998,
  • Putnam, R., Leonardi, R. ve Nanetti, R., (1993), Making Democracy Work Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Rauch James E. ve Trindade, Vitor, “Ethnic Chinese Network in International Trade”, NBER Working Paper, 2002, No. w7189.
  • Rauch, J. E., “Networks versus markets in international trade”, Journal of International Economics, 1999, 48: 7–35.
  • Rauch, J., “Business and social networks in international trade”. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39, 1177– 1203.
  • Smith, Adam, (1997 [1776]), Ulusların Zenginliği, çev. Ayse Yunus ve Mehmet Bakırcı, Alan yayıncılık, Istanbul.
  • Tadesse, Bedassa and Roger White, “Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences?” Applied Economics Letters, 2010, 17, 147–152.
  • UNCTAD (2011), UNCTADstat, http://unctadstat.unctad.org.University Press.
  • World Trade Organisation (2011), International Trade Statistics.
Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7262
  • Başlangıç: 1984
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Öğrencilerin şehirlerin markalaşmasına yönelik algıları

Ruziye COP, İlknur AKPINAR

ONLİNE ALIŞVERİŞTE TÜKETİCİLERİN TERCİHLERİNİ ETKİLEYEN UNSURLARIN BELİRLENMESİ

Kader OSKAYBAŞ, Tolga Dursun, Dursun YENER

TÜRKİYE TEKSTİL VE HAZIR GİYİM SEKTÖRÜNDE İTHALAT BAĞIMLILIĞI

Mehmet ŞİŞMAN, Erdem BAĞCI

KÜÇÜK AÇIK EKONOMİLERDE DÖVİZ KURU İLE FAİZ ORANI ARASINDAKİ OYNAKLIK DEĞİŞ-TOKUŞUNUN KESTİRİMİ: HONG KONG ÖRNEĞİ

Aslı ŞEN TAŞBAŞI

Popüler türk dizilerindeki başrol erkek oyuncuların marka denkliği boyutlarının karşılaştırılması ve tüketicinin satın alma niyetine etkileri: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma

Oylum ALTUNA KORKUT, F. Müge ARSLAN

LİDERLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ VE HEDEF BELİRLEME YETKİNLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİNE BİR BAKIŞ: TELEKOMUNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDEN BİR UYGULAMA

Nihan YILDIRIM, Hilal ELBAŞ

TEK PARTİDEN ÇOK PARTİYE GEÇİŞ SIRASINDA BİR GAZETE: YENİ DÜNYA

Meral DEMİREL

POPÜLER TÜRK DİZİLERİNDEKİ BAŞROL ERKEK OYUNCULARIN MARKA DENKLİĞİ BOYUTLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI VE TÜKETİCİNİN SATIN ALMA NİYETİNE ETKİLERİ: ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Oylum KORKUT ALTUNA, F. Müge Arslan

ENTELEKTÜEL SERMAYENİN İŞLETME BAZINDA ÖLÇÜLMESİNDE KULLANILAN YÖNTEMLER VE SİGORTA SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yunus BÖLÜKBAŞI

Küçük açık ekonomilerde döviz kuru ile faiz oranı arasındaki oynaklık değiş-tokuşunun kestirimi: Hong Kong örneği

Aslı TAŞBAŞI ŞEN