Değişen Ve Popülerleşen Bir Kavram Olarak Avrupalılaşma

Öz Bu çalışmada Avrupa Birliği çerçevesinde yaklaşık son yirmi yılda giderek daha fazla kullanılan Avrupalılaşma kavramının hem söz konusu popülerleşmesinin sebepleri açıklanırken hem de içeriği açısından tanımlanmasında yaşanan değişim izah edilecektir Tanımlamaya ilişkin olarak 1980’lere kadar öncelikle aşağıdan yukarıya bir süreç olarak açıklanan kavram; bu tarihten sonra ve özellikle 1990’lardan itibaren yukarıdan aşağıya boyutuyla kullanılmıştır Kavramın popülerleşmesi de yine 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren AB’nin genişleme ve derinleşme süreçlerine bağlı ve eş zamanlı olarak ortaya çıkan bir dizi sebebe dayanmıştır Anahtar Kelimeler: Avrupalılaşma Avrupa Birliği Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Genişlemesi EUROPEANISATION AS A CHANGING AND POPULARISED CONCEPT ABSTACT In this study the concept Europeanisation that is referred more frequently in the last two decades within the context of the European Union will be explained in terms of both the reasons of its rising popularity and contextual change in its definition Regarding the definition while the concept was explained as a bottom up process until 1980s then and especially after 1990s it has been considered as a top down process Also popularisation of the concept again by the 1990s has depended upon some simultaneously emerged reasons related to the widening and deepening processes of the EU Keywords: Europeanisation European Union Central and East European Enlargement

Değişen Ve Popülerleşen Bir Kavram Olarak Avrupalılaşma

___

  • Agh, A. (1998). The Politics of Central Europe, London: Sage. Aron, R. (1974). “Is Multinational Citizenship Possible?”. Social Research. 4 (41): 638- 56.
  • Aron, R. (1976). “The Crisis of the European Idea”. Government and Opposition, 11 (1): 5-19.
  • Bideleux, R. (2001). “‘Europeanisation’ and the Limits To Democratisation In East- Central Europe”. G. Pridham and A. Agh (eds.), Prospects For Democratic Consolidation In East-Central Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 25- 54.
  • Bempt, P., Theelen, G. (1996). From Europe Agreements to Accession: Integration of the Central and Eastern European Countries to the European Union. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
  • Bryant, C. (1994) “Economic Utopianism and Sociological Realism: Strategies for Transformation in East-Central Europe”. C. Bryant ve E. Mokrzycki (eds.), The New Great Transformation?, London: Routledge, 58-78.
  • Delanty, G. (2000). “Social Integration and Europeanization: The Myth of Cultural Cohesion”. Yearbook of European Studies, 14, 221-238.
  • Dermot, K. (1989). Ireland and the Challenge of European Integration, Cork: Hibernian University Press.
  • Emerson, M. (1998). Redrawing the Map of Europe. London: Macmillan.
  • Featherstone, K. (2003). “In the Name of Europe”. K. Featherstone ve C. M. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Pres, 3-26.
  • Featherstone, K., Radaelli, C. M. (2003). “A Conversant Research Agenda”, K. Featherstone ve C. M. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 331-341.
  • Grabbe, G. (2003). “Europeanization Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process”. K. Featherstone ve C. M. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 303-327.
  • Johnson, S., Loveman, G. (1995). Starting Over in Eastern Europe: Entrepreneurship and Economic Renewal, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Ladrech, R. (1994). “Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 32 (1): 69-88
  • Lawton, T. C. (1999). “Governing the Skies: Conditions for the Europeanisation of Airline Policy”. Journal of Public Policy. 19 (1): 91-112
  • Padgett, S., Paterson, W. E., Smith, G. (2003). Developments in German Politics 3. New York: Palgrave Macmillan., 161-183.
  • Papcke, S. (1992). “Who Needs European Identity and What Could It Be?”. Brian Nelson et al (eds.), The Idea of Europe, Oxford: Berg, 61-75.
  • Pridham, G., (1999). “The European Union, Democratic Conditionality and Transnational Party Linkages: the Case of Eastern Europe”. J. Grugel (ed.), Democracy without Borders. London: Routledge, s. 59-76.
  • Radaelli, C. (2001). “Conceptualising Europeanisation: Theories, Methods and the Challenge of Empirical Research”, http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/poli/juc/2001/papers (18 Kasım 2003), 2.
  • Risse, T., Caporaso, J., Cowles, M. G., (2001). “Europeanizaton and Domestic Change: Introduction”. M. G. Cowles et al. (eds), Transforming Europe, Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1-21.
  • Schimmelfenning, F., Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, London: Cornell University Pres.
  • Sedelmeier, U. Constructing the Path to Eastern Enlargement, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Taylor, P. (1983). The Limits of European Integration, Kent: Croom Helm Ltd.
  • Young, S. Z. (1973). Terms of Entry: Britain’s Negotiations with the European Community 1970-72, London: Heinemann.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-8880
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi