An Investigation of the Views on the Integration of Science Technology and Mathematics in a Mathematics Teacher Education Program
Öz
STEM is a new concept for Turkey. Interest is increasing in the academic community of the related fields andespecially in the field of education of science and mathematics. At the practical level there are sparseindividual efforts of practice in high schools by teachers of science and mathematics. Therefore our primaryaim is to understand how this idea is reflected in the minds of teacher candidates of the related fields in a nonintegratedmathematics-science program. We also analyzed the curricula followed in the above programs.Our sample consisted of 349 teacher candidates from the departments of mathematics, science and computereducation and instructional technologies education who were in their final years. For this inquiry we use amixed methods strategy. We use both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data comes from thescale developed by the researchers “The integration of STEM” and also from a questionnaire for thedemographics of the sample. Qualitative data comes from the programs used in the departments. Documentanalysis method and descriptive & inferential statistics techniques, are used to analyze data from the scaleand from the questionnaire. Findings of the study suggest positive attitudes towards STEM integration.Findings also indicate similar and different attitudes with respect to the department. Reasons for these werediscussed with regard to the current literature and to the curricula of the departments under study.
___
- Austin, J.D., Converse, R.E, Sass, R.L. & Tomlins, R. (1992). Coordinating Secondary
School Science and Mathematics, School Science and Mathematics, 92(2), 64-
68.
- Ayas, A., Aydin, E. & Corlu, M.S. (2013). Mathematics and science assessment in the
Turkish educational system. Middle Grades Research Journal, 8, 11-24.
- Aydın, E. & Delice, A. (2007). Experiences of Mathematics Student Teachers in a
Series of Science Experiments 6th World Scientific and Engineering Academy
and Society (WSEAS) International Conference on Education and Educational
Technology. Venice, Italy.
- Aydın, E., Delice, A, Derin, G. & Yaşin, Ö., (2016). Fen, Matematik ve Teknoloji
Eğitiminin Bütünleştirilmesi Ölçek Çalışması. International Journal of
Educational Studies in Mathematics (IJESIM). 2(2), 1-13.
- Berlin, D.F. & White, A.L. (2012). A Longitudinal Look at Attitudes and Perceptions
Related to the Integration of Mathematics. Science, and Technology
Education.112(1), 20–30.
- Corlu, M.S. Capraro, R.M. & Capraro, M.M. (2014). Introducing STEM Education:
Implications for Educating Our Teachers For the Age of Innovation. Education
and Science. 39(171).
- Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Çorlu, M. A. (2015). Investigating the mental readiness
of pre-service teachers for integrated teaching. International Online Journal of
Educational Sciences, 7(1), 17-28.
- Corlu, M.A. & Aydin, E. (2016). Evaluation of learning gains through integrated STEM
projects. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and
Technology, 4(1), 20-29. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.35021.
- Çorlu, M. S. (2014). FeTeMM eğitimi araştırmaları: Alanda merak edilenler, fırsatlar ve
beklentiler [STEM education research: Latest trends, opportunities, and
expectations]. Turkish Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 4-10.
- Delice, A. & Roper, T. (2006). Implications of a comparative study for mathematics
education in the English education system. Teaching Mathematics and its
Applications: An International Journal of the IMA. 2, 64 – 72.
- Derin, G. Yaşin, Ö., Aydın, E. & Delice, A. (2014). Turkish Teacher Candidates’
Attitudes on the Integration of STEM Fields. Paper presented in the
International Society of Educational Research conference. Nevşehir, Türkiye.
- Foss, D. H., & Pinchback, C L. (1998). An interdisciplinary approach to science,
mathematics, and reading: Learning as children learn. School Science and
Mathematics, 98(3), 149-155.
- Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: a
stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &
Technology,3(3), 185–18.
- Hartzler, D. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies conducted on integrated curriculum
programs and their effects on student achievement. Doctoral dissertation.
Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMI No: 9967119).
- Delice, A. and Kertil, M. (2015). Investigating the representational fluency of preservice
mathematics teachers in a modelling process. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education 13(3): 631-656.
- Kertil, M. & Gurel, C. (2016). Mathematical modeling: A bridge to STEM education.
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology,
4(1), 44-55. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.95761.
- Leatham K. R. (2002). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about
teaching with technology. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of
Georgia, Athens, GA.
- McKinsey & Company Report. (2010). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining
top third graduates to careers in teaching. Retrieved from
www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/socialsector.
- Ministry of National Education. (2009a). İlköğretim matematik dersi 1-5. sınıflar
öğretim programı [Primary schools mathematics education program for
grades 1-5]. Ankara, Turkey.
- Ministry of National Education. (2009b). İlköğretim matematik dersi 6-8. Sınıflar
öğretim programı ve kilavuzu [Primary schools mathematics education
program and guide for grades 6-8]. Ankara, Turkey
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for
school mathematics.
- National Research Council (1996). National Committee on Science Education
Standards and Assessment.
- Wilson M., Cooney T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In:
Leder G. C., Pehkonen E., Törner G. (eds), Beliefs: A hidden variable in
mathematics education? Vol. 31. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, pp. 127–147.
- Yağcı, Y. (2010). A different view of the Bologna process: The case of Turkey.
European Journal of Education, 45(4), 588-600.