Yükseköğretimde Hedeflenen Dönüşümü Gerçekleştirme Araçlarından Eğitim Programı 4.0

Bu araştırmanın amacı, endüstri, eğitim ve üniversite 4.0 özelliklerine uygun bir eğitim programı 4.0 yoluyla bireylere/öğrencilere hangi temel niteliklerin kazandırılması gerektiğini belirlemek ve böyle bir programın geliştirilmesine yönelik öneriler sunmaktır. Araştırma, bir derleme (review) araştırmasıdır ve araştırmada Pautasso (2013) tarafından önerilen işlem basamakları izlenmiştir. Araştırmada, yapılan alan yazın taraması sonucunda endüstri 4.0 doğrultusunda bireylere kazandırılması amaçlanan temel nitelikler belirlenmiştir. Bunlar arasından özellikle teknoloji bilgi/becerisine sahip olma, iletişim kurma, eleştirel düşünme, problem çözme becerileri, öğrenme isteği gibi niteliklerin pek çok çalışmada ortak olarak vurgulandığı ancak bu niteliklerin büyük bir kısmının alan yazında farklı şekillerde adlandırıldığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca araştırmada eğitim programı 4.0 kavramı açıklanarak programın geliştirilmesi/uygulanmasına yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur: Eğitim programı 4.0’ın genel amaçları ve özellikleri açıklanmış; amaç, içerik, eğitim durumu ve değerlendirme boyutlarına ilişkin ayrıntılı ve uygulamaya dönük öneriler sunulmuştur. Endüstri 4.0 doğrultusunda yükseköğretimde beklenen değişimi/ dönüşümü sağlama için eğitim programı 4. 0 önerilmektedir. 

Curriculum 4.0: One of the Means of Achieving the Targeted Transformation in Higher Education

The aim of that study is to determine what basic qualifications are necessary to obtain individuals through curriculum 4.0, which is in line with industry, education and university 4.0 characteristics, and to make suggestions about developing such a curriculum. The study is a review study and the steps presented by Pautasso (2013) were followed. In the study, the basic qualifications aimed at gaining individuals in line with industry 4.0 were examined. It was found out that technology knowledge / skills, communication, critical thinking, problem solving, learning desire as the most expressed qualifications, and it was also discovered that  the same qualifications are called in different ways in the literature. In addition, the study explained the term curriculum 4.0 and suggestions for the development / implementation of the curriculum were presented. The aims and features of curriculum 4.0 are explained; detailed and practical recommendations regarding the objectives, content, learning experiences and evaluation of the curriculum are presented. Curriculum 4.0 is offered to enhance expected change / transformation in higher education in line with industry 4.0.

___

  • Abersek, B. (2017). Evolution of competences for new era or education 4.0. The XXV. conference of Czech Educational Research Association (CERA/ČAPV) “Impact of Technologies in the Sphere of Education and Educational Research” at 13 – 14 September 2017.Aoun, J. E. (2017). How college students should prepare for our automated future. Retrieved from http://time.com/4957419/college-students-artificial-intelligence-preparation/Arbeit 4.0 (2015), Megatrends digitaler Arbeit – 25 Thesen, Ergebnisse eines Projekts von Shareground und der Universität St. Gallen, Retrieved May 16, 2018 from https://www.telekom.com/static/- /285820/1/150902-Studie-St.-Gallen-siAslangilay A. S., (2016), “Küreselleşme sürecinde inovasyonun öne- mi ve yükseköğretim kurumlarına düşen görevler”, Bolum 10, Eğitim Bilimlerinde yenilikler ve nitelik arayışı, Eds. Demirel Ö, Dincer S., Pegem Akademi, E-ISSN 9786053183563 Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/GlobalCentury_ final.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.Avrupa Komisyonu (2014). Uluslararası bilgisayar ve enformasyon okuryazarlığı anketi Aydagül, B. (2017). Yeni Sanayi Devrimi ve Eğitim. Aydagül, B. (2017). Yeni Sanayi Devrimi ve Eğitim. Eğitim Reformu Girşimi Bastedo, M. N. (2011). Curriculum in higher education: The historical roots of contemporary issues. P. Altbach, R. Berdahl, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political and economic challenges içinde (s.60-83). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. Bates, T. (1997, June). Restructuring the University for Technological Change. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching’de sunulmuş bildiri, London.Bound, 1990; Harvey, Moon, & Gheall, 1997; Leveson, 2000). Braga, T. 2010. Corporate Purpose Impact, Internal study by Burson-Marsteller and IMD Business School. Retrieved from http://burson - marsteller.eu/wp- content/uploads/2011/10/IMD-B-M-Corporate-Purpose-Impact-Study-2010.pdfBrown-Martin, G. (2017). Education and the Fourth Industrial Revolution Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, USA: W. W. Norton & Company.Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers' perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st Century US workforce: ERIC.CEDA – Committee for Economic Development of Australia. (June,2015) Australia’s future workforce? Melbourne, Australia. ISBN: 0 85801 300 2 Retrieved from: Christensen, C., & Eyring, H.J. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of higher education. Forum for the Future of Higher Education. Retrieved from:Cimatti, B. (2016). Definition, role for the quality of development, assessment of soft skills and their organizations and enterprises. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(1), 97–130. Cinque, M. (November, 2015). Comparative analysis on the state of the art of soft skill identification and training in Europe and some Third Countries. Speech at “Soft Skills and their role in employability-New perspectives in teaching, assessment and certification” workshop in Bertinoro, FC, Italy. Conference Board, Corporate Voices for Working Families, Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Society for Human Resource Management. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century workforce. www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF9-29-06.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.Dede, C. (2010). Comparing Frameworks for 21st Century skills. J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st Century skills: Rethinking how students learn içinde (s.51-76). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree. Ehlers, 2018 (https://www.slideshare.net/uehlers/curriculum-40-77000980); European Commission. (2018). e-Skills for growth and jobs [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/digital-economy/e-skills/ [Acessed 01-Mar-2017].Evans, N. & Sawyer, J. (2009). Internet Usage in Small Businesses in Regional South Australia: Service Learning Opportunities for a Local University. Education in Rural Australia, 19 (1): 15–33. FICCI & EY (2017). Leapfrogging to Education 4.0: Student at the coreGallagher, S., & Garrett, G. (2013). Disruptive Education: Technology Enabled Universities’. The United States Studies Centre at The University of Sydney, NSW Government. Retrieved from: http://ussc.edu.au/ussc/assets/media/docs/publications/130801_DisruptiveEducation_ GallagherGarrett.pdfGENERATION Z AND THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATIONGibb, S. (2014). Soft skills assessment: Theory development and the research agenda. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(4), 455-471. Göker, S. D. (2017). Reflective models in teacher supervision introduced by Education 4.0: The teacher in the mirror. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 1(1), 1-17. Günay, D. (2007). Yirmibirinci yüzyılda üniversite, değişim çağında yükseköğretim, C. C. Aktan (Ed.). Değişim Çağında Yükseköğretim içinde (s. 77-88). İzmir: Yaşar Üniversitesi.Harkins. A. M.(2008, March 28). Leap frog Principles and Practices: Core Components of Education 3.0 and 4.0. Futures Research Quarterly draft VIII, 1-15.Hayirsever, F. & Orhan, A. (2018). Ters yüz edilmiş öğrenme modelinin kuramsal analizi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 572-596. DOI: 10.17860/mersinefd.431745. Hayırsever, F., & Kalaycı, N. (2017). A comparative analysis of general culture courses within the scope of knowledge categories in undergraduate teacher education program s “Turkey and the USA”. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(1), 1-18. Hooker, M. (1997). The transformation of higher education. http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/seminars/Hooker.asp sayfasından erişilmiştir.James, R. A. (2003). Implications for community college curricula changes in office technology as compared to the office technology needs of employers (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). University of La Verne, La Verne, CA. http://proquest.umi.com.jproxy.lib.ecu.edu/dissertations/preview_all/3114710 sayfasından erişilmiştir. Jeschke, S. & Heinze, U. (2014). Higher Education 4.0 – Trends and future perspectives for teaching and learning. 02.03.2018 tarihinde www.ima-zlw-ifu.rwth-aachen.de adresinden erişildi. Kalaycı, N. (2008). Yükseköğretim toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamalarında ihmal edilen unsurlardan “TKY Merkezi” ve “Eğitim Programları”. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 163-188.Kechagias, K. (2011). Teaching and assessing soft skills. MASS Project, September.Laptevа, A. V., & Efimov, V. S. (2016). New generation of universities. University 4.0. Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social Sciences, 11(9), 2681– 2696.McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%2 0Digital/Our%20Insights/Disruptive%20technologies/MGI_Disruptive_technologies_ Full_report_May2013.ashxMiller, R. (1997). http:www.sfsu.edu/~uic. September 1997. uic@sfsu.edu. Mourshed, Farrell, Barton (2012). Education to Employment: Designing a System that Works. Mustapha, R. (2018). The Impact of Industrial Revolution 4.0 on Educational Technology, Digital Innovation and Future Learning. Retrieved from http://www.iclist.fiet.kmutt.ac.th/2018/iclist2018/download/Dr.Ramlee_Abstract.pdf National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2015). Job Outlook 2015. http://www.umuc.edu/documents/upload/nace-job-outlook-2015.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.Nedeva, V. & Dineva, S. (2018). New learning innovations with Web 4.0. Retrieved from http://www.icvl.eu/2012/disc/icvl/documente/pdf/tech/ICVL_Technologies_paper11.p df.Nicolescu, B. (2000). The transdisciplinary evolution of learning. Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit. Why democracy needs the humanities. USA: Princeton University. OECD. (2008). Higher education to 2030: Demography. Paris: OECD.OECD. (2016). Getting skills right: Assessing and anticipating changing skill needs. 20.03.2018 tarihinde http://www.oecd.org/els/getting- skills-right-assessing-and-anticipating-changing-skill-needs-9789264252073- en.htm. adresinden erişildi. Ontario Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2016). Towards defining 21 st century competencies – Foundation document for discussion, Winter edition 2016, Page 36. Öztemel, E. (2018). Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimlerin Değerlendirilmesi ve Eğitim 4.0. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 25-30. Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149.Pautasso, M., & Bourne, P. (2013). Ten simple rules for writİng a literature review. Retrieved from htp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/artcles/PMC3715443/ ??????Philipose, L. (2010). Germany: Hard facts about soft skills in universities. University World News, 142. 10. 04.2018 tarihinde http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20101002085623288 adresinden erişildi. Pink, D. (2009). Drive: The Amazing Truth about what really motivates us. New York: Rivergate Books.Pooworawan, Y. (2015). Challenges of New Frontier in Learning: Education 4.0. Document by Innovative Learning Center, Chula- Longkorn University, Bangkok. Pooworawan.Y.(2015, November 12).Challenges of New Frontier in Learning: Education 4.0. Document by Innovative Learning Center, Chulalongkorn University, DusitThani Hotel, Bangkok Powel, 2018 (https://stephenp.net/4-0-innovative-curriculum-design/)Prinz, C., Morlock, F.., Freith, S., Kreggenfeld, N., Kreimeier, D., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2016). Learning Factory modules for smart factories in Industrie 4.0. Science Direct Procedia, 54, 113-118. Puncreobutr R. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Teresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 92-97. Resnick, M. (2002). Rethinking learning in the digital age. In G. Kirkman (Ed) The Global Information Technology Report: Readiness for the Networked World. Oxford University 32-37. Retrieved from: https://llk.media.mit.edu/papers/mres-wef.pdfRifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Macmillan.Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of 5. capitalism. New Yor: St. Martin’s Press. Sackey, S. M. & Bester, A. (2016). Industrıal engineerıng curriculum in industry 4.0 in a South African context. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27 (4), 101-114. Salmi, J. (2009). Dünya çapında üniversiteler kurmanın zorluğu (K. Yamaç, Çev.) Ankara: Eflatun.Schuster, K. & Kerstin G. (2018). Preparing for Industry 4.0 – Collaborative virtual learning environments in engineering education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279243225_Preparing_for_Industry_40_- _Collaborative_Virtual_Learning_Environments_in_Engineering_Education. Schwab, K., & Samans, R. (2016). Future of jobs. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/preface/.Selamat, A. (2017). Higher Education 4.0 : Current status and readiness in meeting the fourth industrial revolution challenges. 21.04.2018 tarihinde https://tr.scribd.com/document/367933437/Higher-Education-4-0-Current-Status-and- Readiness-in-Meeting-the-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-Challenges-1 adresinden erişildi. Sinlarat. P. (2016). Education 4.0 is More than Education. Annual Academic Seminar of the Teacher’s Council 2016 on the topic of Research of the Learning Innovation and Sustainable Educational Management. Bangkok: The Secretariat Office of Teacher’s Council.Stannard-Stockton, S. (2009). T-shaped people & philanthropy. http://www.ssireview.org/opinion/entry/t_shaped_people_philanthropy/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.Teaching tools (edudemic). (2012).10 incredible powerful tools of the future. 02. 03.2018 tarihinde https://educationprospector.wordpress.com/2012/08/18/teaching-tools- edudemic/ adresinden alınmıştır. TEDMEM. (2016). Ulusal eğitim programı 2015-2022. Ankara: TEDMEM. Ten Jobs That Didn’t Exist 10 Years Ago. (2016). 10.01.2018 tarihinde https://digitalmarketing institute.com/blog/10-jobs-didnt-exist-10-years-ago adresinden erişildi. Thiele, A. K., Mai, J. A., & Post, S. (2014). The student-centered classroom of the 21st century: Integrating web 2.0 applications and other technology to actively engage students. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 28(1), 80. Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (1996). Zenginlik devrimi (S. Yeniçeri, Çev.), İstanbul: Koridor. TÜSİAD & BCG (2016). Türkiye’nin küresel rekabetçiliği için bir gereklilik olarak Sanayi 4.0: Gelişmekte olan ekonomi perspektif. İstanbul: TÜSİAD. University leaders divided over fourth industrial revolution (2018). Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/university-leaders-divided-over-fourth- industrial-revolution Varış. F. (1974). Üniversitenin değişen fonksiyonu ve bir kaç sorun. http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/40/494/5841.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.Wallner T. & Wagner G. (2016). Academic Education 4.0. Paper presented at International Conference on Education and New Developments, June 2016, Slovenia.Wallner, T. & Gerold, W. Academic Education 4.0. In M. Carmo (Eds.), END 2016 - International Conference on Education and New Developments, WIARS Publishing, Lisbona, 2016, pp. 155-159.Walsh & Donaldson (2017). Relevant in the era of Industry 4.0 [Power Point Slides]. Retrieved from https://www.eurashe.eu/library/mission-phe/EURASHE_AC_LeHavre_170330- 31_pres_WALSH-DONALDSON.pdf. Wilhelm, W. J., Logan, J., Smith, S. M., & Szul, L. F. (2002). Meeting the demand: Teaching “soft" skills.Yazıcı, E. & Düzkaya, H. (2016). Endüstri devriminde dördüncü dalga ve eğitim: Türkiye dördüncü dalga endüstri devrimine hazir mi? Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 7 (13), 49-88. Yenen, V. & Gözlü, S. (2005). İş çevresinin üniversite mezunlarından ve üniversite eğitiminden beklentileri. “Düşünceden Uygulamaya Değer Yaratma” V. Ulusal Üretim Araştirmalari Sempozyumu bildirileri, 415-420. Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education. University of Bolton: CETIS. Yun, J.J. (2017). Business model design compass: Open innovation funnel to schumpeterian new combination business. Cham: Springer. Zhoa.Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. California: Corwin.
Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1307-1076
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: BAYBURT UNIVERSITESI
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Yabancılara Özel Amaçlı Türkçe Öğretimi: İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesinde Öğrenim Gören Yabancı Uyruklu Öğrenciler İçin İlk 1000 Sözcük Listesi Önerisi

Mustafa ULUTAŞ, Mehmet KARA

Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematik Öğretimine İlişkin Öz-Yeterlik, Matematiksel Problem Çözmeye Yönelik, Matematiksel İnançları ve Bu İnançlar Arasındaki İlişki

Neslihan USTA, Burçin GÖKKURT ÖZDEMİR, Tamer KUTLUCA

Sosyal Beceri Geliştirme Sistemi- Derecelendirme Ölçeği (3-5 Yaş Okul Öncesi Versiyonu) Öğretmen Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Cansu TUTKUN, Çağlayan DİNÇER

Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Barış Algıları (Kırıkkale Örneği)

Gülay EKİCİ, Erdi ERDOĞAN

Göç, Toplumsal Uyum ve Aidiyet

Akif SÖZER

İlkokul Dördüncü Sınıf Öğrencilerine Yönelik Özdüzenlemeli Öğrenme Envanteri’nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Halil ÇOKÇALIŞKAN, Gönül Sakız, Midrabi Cihangir DOĞAN

Matematik Okuryazarlığı Soru Yazma Sürecinde Yer Alan Eylemlerin Belirlenmesi ve Sıralarının Kestirilmesi

Furkan DEMİR

Yabancıların Türkçe Öğrenme Kaygıları Ölçeği: Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması

Oğuzhan SEVİM

Yabancılara Türkçe Öğretenlerin Başvurdukları Kelime Öğretim Stratejilerinin Belirlenmesi

Muhammet MEMİŞ

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmeni Adaylarının Bazı Kimya Konularında Akıl Yürütmelerinin İncelenmesi

Gülay İLHAN, Erol ASİLTÜRK