___

• Yıldırım, K., Yaşar, Ö. ve Murat, D. (2016). Öğretmen ve Öğrenci Görüşleri Temelinde Akıllı Telefonların Eğitim Öğretim Ortamlarında Kullanılmasının ve Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. [Based On The Views Of Teachers and Students Analysing The Usage Of Smartphones In Teaching and Learning Environments and Effects] International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 2(2), 72-84.
• Yoon, J. Y., Moon, J. S., Kim, M. J., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H. A., Heo, B. R., Kim, J. E., Hong, H. J. (2011). Smartphone addiction and health problem on university students. Journal of Korean Association for Crisis and Emergency Management, 3(2), 92-104.
• Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multitasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58, 365–374.
• Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. doi:10.1111/j.14678535.2007.00809.x.
• TÜİK, (2017) Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, [Household Information Technologies Usage Survey] 2017. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=1062
• Thomas, K., O’Bannon, B. W, & Britt, V. G. (2014). Standing in the schoolhouse door: Teacher perceptions of mobile phones in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 373-395.
• Thomas, K., & Orthober, C. (2011). Using text-messaging in the secondary classroom. American Secondary Education, 39(2), 55-76.
• Tindell, D. R., & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: a survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1-9.
• Tesch, F., Coelho, D., & Drozdenko, R. (2011). We have met the enemy and he is us: Relative potencies of classroom distractions. Business Education Innovation Journal, 3(2), 13-19.
• Smith, A., McGeeney, K., Duggan, M., Rainie, L. & Keeter, S. (2015). US smartphone use in 2015. Pew research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/03/PI_Smartphones_0401151.pdf.
• Ruggiero, D., & Mong, C. J. (2015). The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 161-178.
• Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced taskswitching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948e958.
• Roodt, S., de Villiers, C., Johnston, K., Ophoff, J., & Peier, D. (2014). YouTube as an academic tool for ICT lecturers. Proceedings of the e-Skills for Knowledge Production and Innovation Conference 2014.
• Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-and-technology
• Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
• Olmstead, K. (2017). A third of Americans live in a household with three or more smartphones [monograph on the Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
• O'Bannon, B., Dunn, K., & Park, Y. (2017, March). Validation of Mobile Phone Use in the Classroom Survey. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1033-1041). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
• Nakamura, H., Hanamitsu, N., & Minamizawa, K. (2015). A (touch) ment: a smartphone extension for instantly sharing visual and tactile experience. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference, 223–224. ACM.
• Muñoz, C. F., & García, F. G. (2016). The use of mobile phones as tools for access and knowledge exchange by students in Spain when studying: Access to leisure, persuasive and regulated schooling contents; key factors to take into consideration to plan targeted advertising campaigns. Prisma Social, (1), 190-208.
• Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2005). Protecting youth online: Family use of filtering and blocking software. Child abuse & neglect, 29(7), 753-765.
• McCoy, B. (2013). Digital distractions in the classroom: Student classroom use of digital devices for nonclassroom related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 5-14.
• Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184
• Markett, C., Sanchez, I. A., Weber, S., & Tangney, B. (2006). Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom. Computers and Education, 46, 280-293.
• Macmillan Dictionary Online, (2017) Phubbing Macmillan Publishers Limited, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/entries/phubbing.html
• Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, 20.
• Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343350.
• Lee, J., Cho, B., Kim, Y., & Noh, J. (2015). Smartphone addiction in university students and its implication for learning. In Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 297-305). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Kwon, M., Lee, J.-Y., Won, W.-Y., Park, J.-W., Min, J.-A., Hahn, C., et al. (2013). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PloS One,8(2),
• Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344-365.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).
• Kim, A. Y., Tak, H. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2010). The development and validation of a learning flow scale for adults. Educational Psychology Research, 24(1), 39-59
• Kim, I., Jung, G., Jung, H., Ko, M., & Lee, U. (2017). Let’s FOCUS: Mitigating Mobile Phone Use in College Classrooms. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), 63.
• Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1182-1192.
• Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Emery, L., Zajac, H., & Thulborn, K. R. (2001). Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. NeuroImage, 14(2), 417-426.
• Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56(2), 370-378.
• Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 22362243.
• Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking: the role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70, 194-202.
• Johnston, K. A., Chen, M-M, & Hauman, M. (2013). Changes in use, perception and attitude of Facebook and Twitter. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation (EJISE), 16(3), 200-210
• Johnston, K. A. (2016). The use, impact, and unintended consequences of mobile web-enabled devices in university classrooms. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 13, 25-46. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3464
• Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280.
• Hwang, Ha S., Son, S. H., & Choi, Y. J. (2011). Exploring factors affecting smart-phone addiction - characteristics of users and functional attributes. Korean Association for Broadcasting, 25(2), 277-313
• Hawi, N. S., & Samaha, M. (2016). To excel or not to excel: Strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Computers & Education, 98, 81-89.
• Hartnell-Young, E., & Vetere, F. (2008). A means of personalizing learning: Incorporating old and new literacies in the curriculum with mobile phones. Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 283-292.
• García-Ormaechea, I., González, I., Duplá, M., Andres, E., & Pueyo, V. (2014). Validation of the preverbal visual assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire. Early human development, 90(10), 635–638.
• Gökdaş, İ., Torun, F., & Bağrıaçık, A. (2014). Öğretmen Adaylarının Cep Telefonlarını Eğitsel Amaçlı Kullanım Durumları ve Mobil Öğrenmeye İlişkin Görüşleri. [Teacher Candidates' Mobile Phones Educational Use Situations and Opinions on Mobile Learning] Adnan Menderes University Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 43-61
• Felisoni, D. D., & Godoi, A. S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers & Education, 117, 175-187.
• Echeverria, A., Nussbaum, M., Calderón, J. F., Bravo, C., Infante, C.Vȧsquez, A. (2011). Face-to-face collaborative learning supported by mobile phones. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 351–363. doi:10.1080/10494820903232943
• Duncan, D., Hoekstra, A., & Wilcox, B. (2012). Digital devices, distraction, and student Performance: Does inclass cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11, 010108-1, 10.3847.
• Dietz, S. & Henrich, C. (2014). Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 163-167.
• Dahlstrom, E., & Bichsel, J. (2014). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, (Research Report), 2014. Educause (Louisville, CO: ECAR).
• Dahlstrom, E. (2012). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, (Research Report), 2012. Educause) (Louisville, CO: ECAR).
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow The psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper, Perennial
• Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications Inc.
• Corbeil, R. C., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2007/1/are-you-ready-for-mobile-learning
• Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42.
• Chen, S., & Tzeng, J. (2010). College female and male heavy internet users' profiles of practices and their academic grades and psychosocial adjustment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 257–262.
• Cambridge Dictionary Online, (2017). Phub Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/phub
• Burton, A. (2015). Lecturers’ experiences of using wikis to support student group work. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 2(2).
• Bull, G., & Thompson, A. (2004). Establishing a framework for digital images in the school curriculum. Leading and Learning with Technology, 31(8), 14-17.
• Bolliger, D. U., & Shepherd, C. E. (2016). Instructor and adult learner perceptions of the use of Internet‐enabled devices in residential outdoor education programs. British Journal of Educational Technology.
• Bolkan, S. & Griffin, D.J. (2017). Students’ use of cell phones in class for off-task behaviors: the indirect impact of instructors’ teaching behaviors through boredom and students’ attitudes, Communication Education, 66(3), 313-329, DOI:10.1080/03634523.2016.1241888 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241888)
• Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275289. doi:10.1080/08832323.2011.622814
• Au, M., Lam, J., & Chan, R. (2015). Social media education: Barriers and critical issues. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology, 199–205. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K., & Huda, M. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 1-17.
• Al Hamdani, D. S. (2014). A constructivist approach to a mobile learning environment. International Journal of Computer Applications, 93(4), 41-46.
• Alarabiat, A., & Al-Mohammad, S. (2015). The potential for Facebook application in undergraduate learning: A study of Jordanian students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 10, 81103. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/2283
• Aljomaa, S. S., Al.Qudah, M. F., Albursan, I. S., Bakhiet, S. F., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 155e164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2016.03.041.
• Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Lessmann, S. (2017). To Phub or not to Phub: Understanding OffTask Smartphone Usage and its Consequences in the Academic. Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, 2017