Hüseyin Samet AŞIKKUTLU, Haldun MÜDERRİSOĞLU

Rekreasyonel Kısıtlayıcıların Belirlenmesi: Ankara Harikalar Diyarı Parkı Örneği

Bu çalışmada, kullanıcı özelliklerinin (sosyo-ekonomik özellikler ve alan kullanım alışkanlıkları) kısıtlayıcılar

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Rekreasyon, Kısıtlayıcı, Kent Parkı, Ankara

Determining of the Recreational Conflicts: Case of Ankara Harikalar Diyarı Park

In this study, 250 questionnaires were applied to the users of Harikalar Diyari Park that located in Ankara withthe aim of determining whether the characteristics of users (social-economic characteristics and land -use habits)are effective on conflicts or not. While measuring the conflicts five pointed Likert Scale was used and by theresult of the analyses six conflicts factor groups (lack of the area, economics, crowded, security, using habits andinternal reasons) were determined. According to findings obtained, convenient areas should be created formiddle aged users. Expectations of users in different income groups should be met. The organizations which willkeep the interests of the experienced users alive should be held. Within this scope, determining the conflicts interms of user satisfaction is important.

Keywords:

Recreation, Conflict, City Park, Ankara,

PDF

___

o Alexandris, K. and Carroll, B. 1997. Demographic Differences in the Perception of Constraints on Recreational Sport Participation: Results From a Study in Greece. 16: 107–125.
o Annett, S., Dabrowski, C. and Robertson, R.A. 1995. Motivations and Constraints to Spring Break Travel: A Cross Gender. Proceedings of the 1995 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 217–221.
o Anonim 2010. http://www. turkiyerehberi.gen.tr (alıntının yapıldığı tarih:12.04.2010)
o Baş, T. 2003. Anket, Seçkin Kitapevi, Ankara. sy 222.
o Crawford, D.W. and Godbey, G. 1987. Reconceptualizing Barriers to Family Leisure. Leisure Sciences. 9: 119–127.
o Crompton, J. L. and Kim, S. S. 2004. Temporal Changes in Perceived Constraints to Visiting State Parks. Journal of Leisure Research. 36(2): 160–182.
o Jackson, E. L. 1988. Leisure Constraints: A Survey of Past Research. Leisure Sciences. 10: 203–215.
o Jackson, E. and Henderson, K. 1995. Gender-Based Analysis of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Science. 17: 31–51.
o Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M. and Cordell, K. 2001. Outdoor Recreation Constraints: Au Examination of Race, Gender, and Rural Dwelling. Southern Rural Sociology. 12: 111–133.
o Kinnaird, V. and Hall, D. 1994. Tourism: A Gender Analysis. Chichester, England: John Willey and Sons.
o Müderrisoğlu, H., Kutay, E. L. ve Örnekçi Eşen, S. 2005. Kırsal Rekreasyonel Faaliyetlerde Kısıtlayıcılar. Ankara Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. Cilt:11 Sayı:1, sf 40–44. Düzce.
o Özdamar, K. 1999. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veriler Analizi. Kaan Kitapevi. Eskişehir.
o Raymore, L., Godbey, G. and Crawford, D. 1994. Self-Esteem, Gender and Socioeconomic Status: Their Relation to Perceptions of Constraint on Leisure Among Adolescents. Leisure Sciences. 15: 291–307.
o Stodolska, M. 1998. Assimilation and Leisure Constraints: Dynamics of Constraints on Leisure in İmmigrant Populations. Journal of Leisure Research. 30: 521–551.
o Walker, G. J. and Virden, R. J. 2005. Constraints on Outdoor Recreation. In E. L. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to Leisure (pp. 201–219). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.