Güven KAYA, Yafes YILDIZ, Zeki ŞALTU, Fatma YAMAN, İlksen ATEŞOĞLU

Koşullu Değer Belirleme Çalışmalarında Bilgi Kısıtının Aşılması İçin Bir Öneri: Yaban Hayatının Ekonomik Değerinin Belirlenmesi Örneği

Yaban hayatını koruma ve avcılık için güvenilir koşullu değer belirleme çalışmalarının tasarımı ve geçerli ödeme

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Koşullu değer belirleme, Bilgi eksikliği, Yaban hayatı, Avcılık

A Suggestion for Overcoming Information Constraint in Contingent Valuation Studies: A Case Study of Economic Valuation of Wildlife Resources

Designing sound contingent valuation studies and deriving valid willingness to pay estimates for preservingwildlife and hunting benefits involves that researchers and beneficiaries have enough information about wildliferesources and its active and passive benefits. But present information about many wildlife areas in Turkey isinsufficient for these studies and limits to attempt valuing wildlife in the country. This issue was faced in a casestudy related to valuing wildlife in Bartin County. In this study pre-interview surveys implemented to active andpassive interest groups were used as a solution way. The particular information about wildlife ecosystems anddemands on preservation and utilization of wildlife resources involved in contingent valuation method study inBartin County was collected in detail with this survey. This information was used for preparing an info-cardabout present conditions of wildlife resources and a scenario card that includes a hypothetical conservation andimprovement project and related maps.

Keywords:

Contingent valuation, Insufficient information, Wildlife, Hunting,

PDF

___

o BÇOM 2008. Bartın İli Yılı Av ve Yaban Hayatı. Bartın Çevre ve Orman Müdürlüğü Resmi Kayıtları, Bartın.
o Bergstrom, J. and Dillman, B. 1985. Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17, 139-150.
o Boyle, K. 1989. Commodity Valuation and the Specification of Contingent Valuation Questions. Land Economics, 55, 57-63.
o Boyle, K., Reiling, S. and Philips, M. 1991. Species Substitution and Question Sequencing in Contingent Valuation Surveys. Leisure Sciences, 12, 103-113.
o Davis, R. 1963. Recreation Planning As An Economic Problem. Natural Resources Journal, 3(2), 239-249.
o Hammack, J. and Brown, G. M. Jr. 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. John Hopkins University Press for Resources for The Future, Baltimore.
o Hanley, N. and Munro, A. 1992. The Effects of Information in Contingent Markets for Environmental Goods. Queen’s University Discussion Papers, Queen’s University, Ontario.
o Hanley, N. and Munro, A. 1994. The Effects of Information in Contingent Markets For Environmental Goods. Discussion Papers in Ecological Economics, 94(5), University of Stirling.
o Hanley, N., Shogren, J. F. and White, B. H. 1996. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. Macmillan Ltd. Press, London.
o Kaya, G. 2002. Pazarı Olmayan Ürünler Çerçevesinde Orman Ürünlerinin Değerinin Belirlenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
o Kaya, G., Daşdemir, İ. ve Akça, Y. 2000. Soğuksu Milli Parkının Ekonomik Değerinin Belirlenmesi. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 1-2, 59-87.
o McCollum, D.W. 2003. Nonmarket Valuation in Action. A Primer On Nonmarket Valuation. P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle and T. C. Brown (Eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 483-535
o Munro, A. and Hanley, N. 1999. Information, Uncertainity and Contingent Valuation. Contingent Valuation of Environmental Preferences: Assessing Theory and Practice in the USA, Europe and Developing Countries. I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis (Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
o Pak, M. 2003. Orman Kaynağından Rekreasyon Amaçlı Yararlanmanın Ekonomik Değerinin Tahmin Edilmesi ve Bu Değer Üzerinde Etkili Olan Değişkenler Üzerine Bir Araştırma (Doğu Akdeniz ve Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi Orman İçi Dinlenme Yerleri Örneği), (Doktora Tezi) Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
o Ortaçeşme, V., Özkan B. ve Karagüzel, O. 2002. An Estimation of the Recreational Use Value of Kurşunlu Waterfall Nature Park by the Individual Travel Cost Method. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26, 57-62.
o Samples, K., Dixon, J. and Gower, M. 1986. Information Disclosure and Endangered Species Valuation. Land Economics, 62, 306-312.
o Whitehead, J. and Blomquist, G. 1991. Measuring Contingent Values for Wetlands: Effects of Information About Related Environmental Goods. Water Resources Research, 27, 2523-2531.