Akdeniz Kıyı Alanının Bütünleyici Çevre Planlamasına Yönelik İşbirlikçi Yaklaşımların Uygulanması: Türkiye Örneği

Bu çalışma, Akdeniz kıyı alanında, özellikle Türkiye’de, bütünleyici çevre planlaması için bir kılavuz olarak

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Çevre Planlaması, Bütünleşik Kıyı Yönetimi, Akdeniz Kıyı Alanı, Türkiye

APPLICATION OF COLLABORATIVE APPROACHES TO THE INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OF MEDITERRANEAN COASTAL ZONE: CASE OF TURKEY

This study, being the assessment of the collaborative land use planning for the coastal zone with theirmethodologies and environmental impact assessment is oriented in such a way that it can also be seen as aguideline for the integrative environmental planning in the Mediterranean coastal zone especially for Turkey.With this study, it is targeted to integrate the techniques of traditional, regional and local land use planning withthose of coastal zone science into application techniques with the potential of developing coastal managementcapabilities for planning. As a result of these, there are some suggestions such as public participation should beused efficiently in each stage of planning processes, local and national authorities should be worked in harmonyand the likes have been made.

Keywords:

Environmental Planning, Integrated Coastal Management, Mediterranean Coastal Zone, Turkey,

PDF

___

o Alexandris, K. and Carroll, B. 1997. Demographic Differences in the Perception of Constraints on Recreational Sport Participation: Results From a Study in Greece. 16: 107–125.
o Annett, S., Dabrowski, C. and Robertson, R.A. 1995. Motivations and Constraints to Spring Break Travel: A Cross Gender. Proceedings of the 1995 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 217– 221.
o Anonim 2010. http://www. turkiyerehberi.gen.tr (alıntının yapıldığı tarih:12.04.2010)
o Baş, T. 2003. Anket, Seçkin Kitapevi, Ankara. sy 222.
o Crawford, D.W. and Godbey, G. 1987. Reconceptualizing Barriers to Family Leisure. Leisure Sciences. 9: 119–127.
o Crompton, J. L. and Kim, S. S. 2004. Temporal Changes in Perceived Constraints to Visiting State Parks. Journal of Leisure Research. 36(2): 160–182.
o Jackson, E. L. 1988. Leisure Constraints: A Survey of Past Research. Leisure Sciences. 10: 203–215.
o Jackson, E. and Henderson, K. 1995. Gender-Based Analysis of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Science. 17: 31–51.
o Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M. and Cordell, K. 2001. Outdoor Recreation Constraints: Au Examination of Race, Gender, and Rural Dwelling. Southern Rural Sociology. 12: 111–133.
o Kinnaird, V. and Hall, D. 1994. Tourism: A Gender Analysis. Chichester, England: John Willey and Sons.
o Müderrisoğlu, H., Kutay, E. L. ve Örnekçi Eşen, S. 2005. Kırsal Rekreasyonel Faaliyetlerde Kısıtlayıcılar. Ankara Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. Cilt:11 Sayı:1, sf 40–44. Düzce.
o Özdamar, K. 1999. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veriler Analizi. Kaan Kitapevi. Eskişehir.
o Raymore, L., Godbey, G. and Crawford, D. 1994. Self-Esteem, Gender and Socioeconomic Status: Their Relation to Perceptions of Constraint on Leisure Among Adolescents. Leisure Sciences. 15: 291–307.
o Stodolska, M. 1998. Assimilation and Leisure Constraints: Dynamics of Constraints on Leisure in İmmigrant Populations. Journal of Leisure Research. 30: 521–551.
o Walker, G. J. and Virden, R. J. 2005. Constraints on Outdoor Recreation. In E. L. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to Leisure (pp. 201–219). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.