FAYDANIN SOSYAL MEDYADAKİ DENEYİM PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ: SOSYAL MEDYAYI SEYREK VE SIK KULLANAN TURİSTİK FAALİYETE KATILMIŞ BİREYLER ARASINDAKİ FARKIN İNCELENMESİ

Öz Günümüzde sosyal medyanın gelişmesi ve yaygınlaşması ile turistler bu mecrada bir araya gelme ve birbirleriyle deneyim ve yorumları paylaşma şansı yakalamaktadırlar.  Turistler seyahat kararı alım aşamasında ve seyahat öncesi/sonrasında deneyimlerini sosyal medyada paylaşmakta ve diğer potansiyel turistler için kolay ulaşılabilir bir bilgi kaynağı yaratmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada sosyal medyayı seyrek ve sık kullanan bireyler için hem fayda değişkeninin alt boyutları (bilgi edinme ve yayma, eğlence, izlenim yönetimi, özdeşleşme ve tanıtım aracılığı) hem de fayda üst yapısının seyahat deneyim paylaşımı üzerindeki etkisine ve gruplar arası farklılıklara odaklanılmaktadır.   Çalışma kapsamında sosyal paylaşım sitesi Facebook’taki seyahat deneyim ve bilgi paylaşımı gruplarında daha önce turistik faaliyete katılmış bireylere anket uygulanmış olup toplamda 279 ankete ulaşılmıştır. Sonuç olarak fayda değişkeninin tüm alt boyutlar üzerinde ve seyahat deneyim paylaşımıyla sosyal medyayı seyrek ve sık kullanan turist gruplarında anlamlı bir etkisi olduğuna, sosyal medyayı seyrek ve sık kullanan turist gruplarında bilgi edinme ve yayma ile tanıtım aracılığında gruplar arası anlamlı bir farkın olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.  

___

  • Atkinson, M., ve Kydd, C. (1997). “Individual Characteristics Associated With World Wide Web Use: An Empirical Study Of Playfulness And Motivation.” Acm Sıgmıs Database, 28(2), 53-62.
  • Beldad, A., ve Kusumadewi, M. C. (2015). “Here‘s My Location, For Your Information: The Impact Of Trust, Benefits, And Social influence On Location Sharing Application Use Among Indonesian University Students.” Computers In Human Behavior, 49, 102-110.
  • Belk, R., ve Yeh, J. H. Y. (2011). “Tourist Photographs: Signs Of Self.” International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5(4), 345–353.
  • Bødker, M.,ve Browning, D. (2012). Beyond Destinations: Exploring Tourist Technology Design Spaces Through Local-Tourist Interactions. Digital Creativity, 23(3-4), 204-224.
  • Bontis, N. (1998). “Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures And Models.” Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
  • Boyd, D. M., Ellison, N. B., (2007) “Social Network Sites: Definition, History And Scholarship” Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, Volume:13, Issue:1, , s. 210-230.
  • Brandtzaeg, P. B., ve Heim, J. (2011). “A Typology Of Social Networking Sites Users.” International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(1), 28- 51.
  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., ve Wang, E. T. (2006). “Understanding Knowledge Sharing In Virtual Communities: An Integration Of Social Capital And Social Cognitive Theories.” Decision Support Systems, 42(3), s. 1872-1888.
  • Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R. M. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. Corsini Encyclopedia Of Psychology. 1–2 John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  • Fehr, E., ve Gächter, S. (2000). “Fairness And Retaliation: The Economics Of Reciprocity”. The Journal Of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181.
  • Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error”. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
  • Goffman, E. (1990). The Presentation Of Self In Everyday Life. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Haldrup, M., ve Larsen, J. (2010). Tourism, Performance And The Everyday: Consuming The Orient. London: Routledge.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., ve Gremler, D. D. (2004). “Electronic Word-Of-Mouth Via Consumer Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers To Articulate Themselves On The Internet?” Journal Of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., ve Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). “The Use Of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling In International Marketing.” Advances In International Marketing, 20(1), 277-319.
  • Hsu, M. H., ve Chiu, C. M. (2004). “Internet Self-Efficacy And Electronic Service Acceptance.” Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369-381.
  • Hsu, C. L., ve Lin, J. C. C. (2008) “Acceptance Of Blog Usage: The Roles Of Techology Acceptance, Social influence And Knowledge Sharing Motivation.” Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.
  • Huang, Y., Basu, C., ve Hsu, M. K. (2010). “Exploring Motivations Of Travel Knowledge Sharing On Social Network Sites: An Empirical Investigation Of US College Students.” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 717-734.
  • Hunt, D., Atkin, D., ve Krishnan, A. (2012). “The Influence Of Computer Mediated Communication Apprehension On Motives For Facebook Use.” Journal Of Broadcasting And Electronic Media, 56, 187–202.
  • Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., ve Maragahh, H. (1995). “Why Do Individuals Use Computer Technology? A Finnish Case Study”. Information & Management, 29(5), 227-238.
  • Jeng, J., ve Fesenmaier, D. R. (2002). “Conceptualizing The Travel DecisionMaking Hierarchy: A Review Ofrecent Developments”. Tourism Analysis, 7(1), 15-32.
  • Kang, M., ve Schuett, M.A. (2013) “Determinants Of Sharing Travel Experience in Social Media”. Journal Of Travel & Tourism Marketing,30(12), 93.
  • Kelman, H.C. (1958) “Compliance, Identification, And Internalization: Three Processes Of Attitude Change.” Journal Of Conflict Resolution, 51-60
  • Kim, Y., Sohn, D., ve Choi, S. M. (2011). “Cultural Difference in Motivations For Using Social Network Sites: A Comparative Study Of American And Korean College Students.” Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 365-372.
  • King, W. R., ve He, J. (2006). “A Meta-Analysis Of The Technology Acceptance Model”. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755
  • Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., ve Hildebrand, T. (2010). “Online Social Networks: Why We Disclose.” Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109-125.
  • Kollock, P. (1999). The Economies Ol Online Cooperation. Communities in Cyberspace, 220.
  • LaRose, R., Mastro, D., ve Eastin, M.S. (2001). “Understanding Internet Usage: A Social-Cognitive Approach To Uses And Gratifications.” Social Sceince Computer Review, 19(4), 396-413.
  • Leary, M. R., ve Kowalski, R. M. (1990). “Impression Management: A Literature Review And Two Component Model”. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
  • Leary, M. R. (1996). Self Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Westview Press.
  • Lee, C., Jarvinen, V., ve Sutherland, J. (2011). “Profiling Social Network Site Users: Who Is the Most Responsive to Marketing Attempts”. In Proc. of The Conf.—American Academy of Advertising (pp. 59-68).
  • Lee, W., Xiong, L., & Hu, C. (2012). “The Effect Of Facebook Users’ Arousal and Valence On Intention To Go To The Festival: Applying An Extension Of The Technology Acceptance Model”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 819-827.
  • Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., ve Pan, B. (2008). “Electronic Word-Of-Mouth in Hospitality And Tourism Management”. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468.
  • Lo, I. S., ve McKercher, B. (2015). “Ideal Image in Process: Online Tourist Photography And İmpression Management.” Annals of Tourism Research, 52, 104-116.
  • Mclure Wasko, M. ve Faraj, S. (2005) “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital And Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks Of Practice”. MIS Quarterly, 29, 1, pp. 35-57.
  • Nahapiet, J., ve Ghoshal, S. (1998). “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, And The Organizational Advantage.” Academy Of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  • Nunnally, J. C., ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). “The Assessment Of Reliability.” Psychometric Theory, 3(1), 248-292.
  • O'neill, M., Palmer, A., ve Charters, S. (2002). “Wine Production As A Service Experience-The Effects Of Service Quality On Wine Sales.” Journal of Services Marketing, 16(4), 342-362.
  • Özata, F. Z., Kılıçer, T., Ağlargöz, F. (2014). “Müptelalardan Mesafelilere Sosyal Ağ Sitesi Kullanıcısı Gençler: Kullanma Motivasyonları ve Davranışları Açısından Profilleri”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(3).
  • Piliavin, J. A. and Cham, H.-W. (1990). “Altruism. A Review of Recent Theory and Research”, Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 27- 65.
  • Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., ve Johnson, B., (2014) “Technology Acceptance Model And Social Media Usage: An Emprical Study On Facebook” Journal Of Enterprise Infromation Management vol.27 pp.6-30.
  • Rigdon, E. E. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling: Nontraditional Alternatives. Wiley Statsref: Statistics Reference Online.
  • Rogers, E.M. (1995) “Diffusion Of Innovations: Modifications Of A Model For Telecommunications. Die Diffusion Von Innovationen In Der Telekommunikation” 17, 25-38.
  • Safko, L. Ve Brake D. K. (2009). The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools & Strategies For Business Succeess. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc
  • Teo, T. S., Lim, V. K., ve Lai, R. Y. (1999). “Intrinsic And Extrinsic Motivation İn Internet Usage”. Omega, 27(1), 25-37.
  • Trammell, K. D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J., ve Sapp, A. M. (2006). “Rzeczpospolita blogów [Republic of Blog]: Examining Polish bloggers through content analysis.” Journal of Computer and Mediated Communication, 11(3)702-722.
  • Van Dick R., (2001) “Identification in Organizational Contexts: Linking Theory And Research From Social And Organizational Psychology”. International Journal Of Management Reviews 3.4 s. 265-283.
  • Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., ve Amato, S. (2010). “PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations To Recent Developments And Open Issues For Model Assessment And Improvement.” In Handbook Of Partial Least Squares (pp. 47-82). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Vogt, C. A., ve Fesenmaier, D. R. (1998). “Expanding The Functional Information Search Model.” Annals of Tourism Research, 25(3), 551- 578.
  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., ve Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). “Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25-33.
  • Zhang, Y. S.R. HiLTZ, (2003) “Factors That Influence Online Relationship Development in A Knowledge Sharing Community,” Proceedings Of The 9thAmerican Conference On Information Systems, 2003, S. 410– 417