___

• Barnett, D. A., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 31–54.
• Bolt, S., Krentz, J., & Thurlow, M. (2002). Are we there yet? Accountability for the performance of students with disabilities (Technical Report 33). University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/ TechReport33.pdf
• Bordignon, C., & Lam, T. C. M. (2004). The early assessment conundrum: Lessons from the past, implications for the future. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 737–749.
• Bricker, D., & Waddell, M. (1996). AEPS measurement for three to six years (Vol. 3). Baltimore MD: Brookes.
• Buzhardt, J., Greenwood, C., Walker, D., Carta, J., Terry, B., & Garrett, M. (2010). A web-based tool to support data-based early intervention decision making. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 201–213.
• Deno S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum- based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
• Downs, A., & Strand, P. S. (2006). Using assessment to improve the effectiveness of early childhood education. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 671–680.
• Ergül, C. (2007). Curriculum based decision making in an early literacy program. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Arizona State University, Arizona, ABD.
• Fewell, R. R. (2000). Assessment of young children with special needs: Foundations for tomorrow. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 38–42.
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Curriculum-based measurement: A unifying framework for conceptualizing learning disability. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 13, 204– 219.
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Education, 77 (2), 64–84.
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436–450.
• Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., Kuntz, S., & Leitschuh, C. (2002). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in movement for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 143–157.
• Hebbeler, K., Barton, L. R., & Mallik, S. (2008). Assessment and accountability for programs serving young children with disabilities. Exceptionality, 16, 48–63.
• Hojnoski, R., Gischlar, K., & Missall, K. (2009a). Improving child outcomes with data-based decision making: Collecting data. Young Exceptional Children, 12(3), 32–44.
• Hojnoski, R., Gischlar, K., & Missall, K. (2009b). Improving child outcomes with data-based decision making: Graphing data. Young Exceptional Children, 12(3), 15–30.
• Johnstone, C. J., Altman, J., Thurlow, M. L., & Thompson, S. J. (2006). A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 2002 through 2004 (Technical Report 45). University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/ Tech45/Technical45.pdf
• Losardo, A., & Notari-Syverson, A. (2001). Alternative approaches to assessing young children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
• Macy, M. G., Bricker, D. D., & Squires, J. K. (2005). Validity and reliability of a curriculum-based assessment approach to determine eligibility for Part C services. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 1–16.
• McConnell, S. R. (2000). Assessment in early intervention and early childhood special education: Building on the past to project into our future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 43–48.
• McConnell, S. R., Priest, J. S., Davis, S. D., & McEvoy, M. A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 2, pp.1231–1246). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychology.
• McLean, M. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment to determine eligibility: Time for a paradigm shift? Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 23–27.
• McLean, M., Bailey, D., & Wolery, M. (1996). Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice- Hall.
• McLean, M., Wolery, M., & Bailey, D. (2004). Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Meisels, S. J. (2001). Fusing assessment and intervention: Changing parents’ and providers’ views of young children. Zero to Three, 21, 4– 10.
• Meisels, S. J. (2006). Accountability in early childhood: No easy answers (Occasional Paper 6). Chicago: Herr Research Center for Children and Social Policy, Erikson Institute.
• Meltzer, L., & Reid, D. K. (1994). New directions in the assessment of students with special needs: The shift toward a constructivist perspective. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 338–355.
• Odom, S. L., & McLean, M. E. (1996). Early intervention/early
• childhood special education: Recommended practices. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
• Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: Can early intervention make a difference? Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 50, 471–491.
• Sandall, S., McLean, M. E., & Smith, B. J. (2000). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early education. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
• Sandall, S. R., Schwartz, I. S., & LaCroix, B. (2004). Interventionists’ perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 161–174.
• Sattler, J. M., & Hoge, R. D. (2006). Assessment of children: Behavioral, social, and clinical foundations. San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
• Scott, V. G., & Weishaar, M. K. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading progress. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38, 153-159.
• Snyder, P. A., Wixson, C. S., Talapatra, D., & Roach, A. T. (2008). Assessment in early childhood: Instruction-focused strategies to support response-to-intervention frameworks. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 25– 35.
• Stecker, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 128–134.
• Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795– 819.
• Stecker, P. M., Lembke, E. S., & Foegen, A. (2008).Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 48–58.
• Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2001). State special education outcomes, 2001: A report on state activities at the beginning of a new decade (Research Report 143). Washington, DC; National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
• Vanderheyden, A. M. (2005). Intervention-driven assessment practices in early childhood/early intervention: Measuring what is possible rather than what is present. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 28–33.
• Walker, D., Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., & Buzhardt, J. F. (2008). The use of Individual Growth and Developmental Indicators for progress monitoring and intervention decision making in early education. Exceptionality, 16, 33–47
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Dibenedetto, M. K. (2008).
• Mastery learning and assessment: Implications for
• students and teachers in an era of high-stakes
• testing. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 206–216.