___

• Aksan, D. (2000). Her yönüyle dil, ana çizgileriyle dilbilim [Language in all aspects, linguistics with its main lines]. Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara.
• Alegria, J., Leybaert, J., Charlier, B., & Hage, C. (1992). On the origin of phonological representations in the deaf: Hearing lips and hands. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junça de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 107-132). Brussels: Elsevier Science.
• Beech, J. R., & Harris, M. (1997). The prelingually deaf young reader: A case of reliance on direct lexical access? Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2), 105-121.
• Breadmore, H. L. (2007). Inflectional morphology in the literacy of deaf children (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Birmingham). Retrieved from https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/591/
• Briscoe, J., Bishop, D. V., & Norbury, C. F. (2001). Phonological processing, language, and literacy: A comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(3), 329-340. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00726
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Manual of data analysis: Statistics, reserach design, SPSS applications and interpretations]. Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
• Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 751-774.
• Center for Assessment and Demographic Studies. (1993). Data from the 1992-93 annual survey of hearing impaired children and youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
• Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R. I. (2000). Theorizing about the relation between ASL and reading. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford & R. I. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 221-259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Clark, D., Gilbert, G., & Anderson, M. (2011). Morphological knowledge and decoding skills of deaf readers. Psychology, 2(2), 109-116.
• Diependaele K., Sandra D.,& Grainger J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Process, 20(1-2), 75-114. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000197
• Domínguez A., de Vega M., & Barber H. A. (2004). Event-related potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 598-608. doi: 10.1162/089892904323057326
• Dyer, A., MacSweeney, M., Szczerbinski, M., Green, L., & Campbell, R. (2003). Predictors of reading delay in deaf adolescents: The relative contributions of rapid automatized naming speed and phonological awareness and decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 215-229.
• Gaustad, M. G., & Kelly, R. R. (2004). The relationship between reading achievement and morpho-logical word analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9(3), 269-285.
• Gaustad, M. G. (2000). Morphographic analysis as a word identification strategy for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 60-80.
• Gaustad, M. G., Kelly, R. R., Payne, J. A., & Lylak, E. (2002). Deaf and hearing students’ morphological knowledge applied to printed English. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(5), 320-324.
• Girgin, Ü. (1997). Eskişehir ili ilkokulları 4. ve 5. sınıf işitme engelli öğrencilerinin okumayı öğrenme durumlarının çözümleme ve anlama düzeylerine göre değerlendirilmesi [To evaluate the reading and learning level of 4th and 5th grade hearing impaired students in Eskişehir according to their level of process and comprehension] (Doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Türkiye) [Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University, Institute of Social Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey]. Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/. (Thesis Number 61171)
• Goldin‐Meadow, S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 222-229.
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
• Guldenoglu, B. (2016). The effects of syllable-awareness skills on the word-reading performances of students reading in a transparent orthography. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 425-442.
• Güldenoğlu, B., Kargin, T., & Miller, P. (2012). İyi ve zayıf okuyucuların kelime işlemleme ve okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin karşılaştırılmalı olarak incelenmesi [Comparing the word processing and reading comprehension of skilled and less skilled reader]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri (KUYEB), 12(4), 2807-2828.
• Hanson, V. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 199-207.
• Hanson, V. L., & McGarr, N. S. (1989). Rhyme generation by deaf adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32(1), 2-11. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3201.02
• Harris, M., & Beech, J. R. (1995). Reading development in prelingually deaf children. In K. E. Nelson & Z. Reger (Eds.), Children’s language (pp. 181-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Hoien T., Lundberg, I., Stanovich, K. E., & Bjaalid, I. K. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 7(2), 171-188.
• Holt, J. A. (1993). Stanford achievement test-8th edition: Reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(2), 172-175. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0684
• Holt, J. A., Traxler, C. B., & Allen, T. E. (1996). Interpreting the scores: A user’s guide to the 9th edition Stanford Achievement Test for educators of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.
• Hoogmoed, A. H., Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Knoors, H. (2011). Morphological sensitivity in deaf readers of Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 619-634.
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127-160.
• Işıkdoğan-Uğurlu, N. (2017). İşitme engelli okuyucuların biçim-sözdizimsel (morpho-syntax) farkındalık becerilerinin eylemlerde uyum ve zaman kategorileri açısından karşılaştırılması [A comparative examination of prelingually deaf readers morpho - syntax awareness skills in verbs terms of tense and agreement categorı̇es] (Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye)
• [Doctoral thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey]. Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/. (Thesis Number 419287)
• Izzo, A. (2002). Phonemic awareness and reading ability: An investigation with young readers who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(4), 18-29.
• Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading. Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology.
• Kargın T., Güldenoğlu, B., & Miller, P. (2014). İşiten ve işitme engelli okuyucuların harf işlemleme ve kelime işlemleme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between letter processing and word processing skills in deaf and hearing readers]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(6), 2213-2238. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.6.2002
• Kargin, T., Guldenoglu, I. B., Miller, P., Hauser, P., Rathmann, C., Kubus, O., & Superegon, E. (2011). Differences in word processing skills of deaf and hearing individuals reading in different orthographies. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(1), 64-83. doi:10.1007/ s10882-011-9255-z
• Kemps, R. J., Wurm, L. H., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1-2), 43-73.
• Kirk, S.A, Gallagher, J.J., & Anastasiow, N.J. (2000). Educating exceptional children (9th ed.). NewYork, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Laçin, E. (2016). İşitme engelli öğrencilerin biçimbilim farkındalık becerilerinin işiten akranları ile karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi [Comparing the morphological awareness skills of deaf and hearing students] (Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye) [Master’s thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey]. Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/. (Tez No. 419274)
• Lewis. R. B., & Doorlag, D. H. (1983). Teaching special studies in mainstream. Ohio, OH: Columbus Charles E. Merill Publishing Company.
• Leybaert, J. (2000). Phonology acquired through the eyes and spelling in deaf children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75(4), 291-318.
• Mahony, D. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 19-44.
• Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading & Writing, 12(3), 191-218.
• Makaroğlu, B., & Ergenç, İ. (2016). Inflectıonal morphologıcal awareness of Turkısh deaf students. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 30-46.
• Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in learning to read: The special case of deaf children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 279-300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Mcguckian, M., & Henry, A. (2007). The grammatical morpheme deficit in moderate hearing impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42(1), 117-136.
• Miller, P. (1997). The effect of communication mode on the development of phonemic awareness in prelingually deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40(5), 1151-1163.
• Miller, P. (2000). Syntactic and semantic processing in Hebrew readers with prelingual deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 14(5), 436-451.
• Miller, P. (2001). Communication mode and the information processing capacity of Hebrew readers with prelingually acquired deafness. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13(1), 83-96.
• Miller, P. (2002a). Another look at the STM capacity of prelingually deafened individuals and its relation to reading comprehension. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(5), 56-70.
• Miller, P. (2002b). Communication mode and the processing of printed words: Evidence from readers with prelingually acquired deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(4), 312-329.
• Miller, P. (2004a). Processing of written words by individuals with prelingual deafness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5), 979-989. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/072)
• Miller, P. (2004b). Processing of written word and non-word visual information by individuals with prelingual deafness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5), 990-1000. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/073)
• Miller, P. (2004c). Processing of written words by individuals with prelingual deafness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5), 979-989.
• Miller, P. (2005a). Reading comprehension and its relation to the quality of functional hearing: Evidence from readers with different functional hearing abilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(3), 305-323. doi: 10.1353/aad.2005.0031
• Miller, P. (2005b). What the word recognition skills of prelingually deafened readers tell about the roots of dyslexia. Journal of Development & Physical Disabilities, 17(4), 369-393.
• Miller, P. (2005c). Changes in the processing of letters, written words, and pseudo-homophones: A comparison of fifth graders and university students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 407-434.
• Miller, P. (2006a). What the processing of real words and pseudo-homophones tell about the development of orthographic knowledge in prelingually deafened individuals. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(1), 21-38. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enj001
• Miller, P. (2006b). What the visual word recognition skills of prelingually deafened readers tell about their reading comprehension problems. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18(2), 91-121. doi: 10.1007/s10882-006-9002-z
• Miller, P. (2010). Phonological, orthographic, and syntactic awareness and their relation to reading comprehension in prelingually deaf individuals: What can we learn from skilled readers? Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 22(6), 549-561. doi: 10.1007/s10882-010-9195-z
• Miller, P., Kargın, T., & Guldenoglu, B. (2012). Differences in the reading of shallow and deep orthography: Developmental evidence from Hebrew and Turkish readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(4), 1-24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01540.x
• Miller, P., Kargin, T., & Guldenoglu, B., (2013). The reading comprehension failure of Turkish prelingually deaf readers: Evidence from semantic and syntactic processing. Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 25(2), 221-239. doi: 10.1007/s10882-012-9299-8
• Nielsen, D. C., & Luetke-Stahlman, B. (2002). Phonological awareness: One key to the reading proficiency of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(3), 11-19. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0213
• Padden, C., & Hanson, V. L. (2000). Search for the missing link: The development of skilled reading in deaf children. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited (pp. 435-447). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Perfetti, C. A., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 32-50.
• Picard, C. J. (2001). Handbook for personel serving students who are deaf or hard hearing. Louisiana Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/37634534/handbook-for-personnel-serving-students-who-are-deaf-or-hard-of-hearing.
• Ross, A. O. (1976). Psychological aspects of learning disabilities and reading disorders. New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Schirmer, B. R. (2001). Psychological, social and educational dimensions of deafness. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Shankweiler, D., Cram, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. M., & Brady, S. A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology and syntax. Psychological Science, 6(3), 149-156. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x
• Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew. Pyschological Bulletin, 114(1), 52-67.
• Sterne, A., & Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological awareness of syllables, rhymes and phonemes in deaf children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(5), 609-625.
• Syverud, S. M., Guardino, C., & Selznick, D. N. (2009). Teaching phonological skills to a deaf first grader: A promising strategy. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(4), 382-388.
• Taft M., Kougious P. (2004). The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain and Language, 90 (1-3), 9-16. 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00415-2
• Taft M., Nguyen-Hoan M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277-296. doi: 10.1080/01690960903043261
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 217-234.
• Transler, C., Gombert, J. E., & Leybaert, J. (2001). Phonological decoding in severely and profoundly deaf children: Similarity judgment between written pseudowords. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(1), 61-82.
• Transler, C., & Reitsma, P. (2005). Phonological coding in reading of deaf children: Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 525-542.
• Traxler, C. (2000). The Stanford achievement test, 9th edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337-348.
• Tunmer, W. E. (2008). Recent developments in reading intervention research: Introduction to special issue. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 299-316. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9108-4.
• Tüfekçioğlu, U. (1992). Kaynaştırmadaki işitme engelli çocuklar. Eskişehir ilindeki normal okullarda eğitim gören öğrencilerin durumu [Hearing-impaired children in mainstreamed: The situation of hearingimpaired students studying in normal schools in Eskişehir]. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 627, Eğitim Fakültesi Yayın No: 24.
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman-Davis, P. (2003). Response to treatment as a means for identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391-410.
• Waters, G. S., & Doehring, D. B. (1990). Reading acquisition in congenitally deaf children who communicate orally: Insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 323-373). San Diego, CA: Academic.
• Wauters, L. N., Van Bon, W. H. J., & Tellings, A. J. M. (2006). Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 49-76.
• Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(1), 66-81.
• Zeshan, U. (2002). Sign language in Turkey: The story of a hidden language. Turkic Languages 6(2), 229-274.