Matematik İşlemlerinde Akıcılığın Geliştirilmesi: Dinleyerek İşlem Yapma Uygulamaları

Bir derleme çalışması olan bu makalenin amacı, matematikte işlem akıcılığının geliştirilmesinde kullanılan tekniklerden biri olan dinleyerek işlem yapmanın (DİY) temel uygulama basamaklarını açıklamak ve öğrencilere ve uygulamacılara sağladığı katkıları alanyazında yer alan bilimsel araştırmalar ışığında tartışmaktır. Çalışmada öncelikle alanyazın araştırmaları ışığında DİY’in uygulama basamakları, uygulama öncesi hazırlıklar, uygulama ve değerlendirme başlıkları altında ele alınarak açıklanmıştır. Uygulama öncesi hazırlıklarda öğrencinin kullanacağı çalışma yaprakları ve ses kayıtlarının nasıl hazırlanması gerektiği açıklanmıştır. Sonra birebir ya da gruba yönelik uygulamaların nasıl yapılması gerektiği açıklanarak değerlendirmede yapılması gereken önemli noktalara değinilmiştir. Daha sonra alanyazında, DİY uygulamalarının etkilerini belirlemeye yönelik araştırmalar, katılımcı sayısı, cinsiyeti, yaşı ve sınıf düzeyi, araştırma deseni, hedeflenen beceri (bağımlı değişken), uygulanan prosedür (bağımsız değişken), uygulama biçimi ve elde edilen sonuçlar ele alınarak açıklanmıştır. Bu değişkenler ışığında sonuçların öğrenciler ve uygulamacılar açısından yararları tartışılmış ve ileri araştırmalara yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dinleyerek işlem yapma, özel eğitim, matematikte akıcılık, temel matematik becerileri

Enhancing Math Facts Fluency: Taped Problems Interventions

The aim of this paper, which is a review, is to explain basic intervention steps of taped problems (TP) technique which is one of the techniques used in enhancing math facts fluency and to discuss the contributions that it provides to students and implementers in the light of scientific studies in the literature. In the light of the literature, first of all, the steps of TP interventions were explained respectively by discussing the titles under preparations prior to the intervention, intervention, and evaluation headings. The worksheets that students will use during the preparation and how the sound recordings should be prepared were explained before the intervention. Then, by explaining how one-to-one or group interventions should be done, important points that need to be addressed in the assessment were referred. Besides, studies aiming to determine the effects of TP interventions, the number of participants, their gender, age and class level, research design, targeted skill (dependent variable), applied procedure (independent variable) intervention method and results were explained. In the light of these variables, the benefits of the results for students and implementers were discussed and recommendations were made for further research.

Keywords:

Taped problems math fluency, basic math skills, low performance students in math, students with special need,

PDF

___

Alptekin, S. (2019). Bir öğrenciye temel bölme işlemlerinde akıcılık kazandırmada dinleyerek işlem yapma uygulamalarının etkililiği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, Erken Görünüm, 20, 1-31. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.455036
Alberto, P. A. & Troutman, A. C. (2013). Applied behaviour analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Aspiranti, K. B., Skinner, C. H., McCleary, D. F. & Cihak, D. F. (2011). Using taped problems and rewards to increase addition-fact fluency in a first-grade general education classroom. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4(2), 25-33. doi:10.1007/BF03391781
Baykul, Y. (2006). İlköğretimde matematik öğretimi (9. Baskı) [Teaching mathematics in primary education] [9th ed.]. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Bliss, S. L., Skinner, C. H., McCallum, E., Saecker, L. B., Rowland-Bryant, E. & Brown, K. S. (2010). A comparison of taped problems with and without a brief posttreatment assessment on multiplication fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(2), 156-168. doi: 10.1007/s10864-010-9106-5
Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., & Lukito, G., (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill by treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 9-83.
Cates, G. L. & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: An instructional hierarchy perspective. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(1), 23-34. doi:1053-0819/03/0300-0023/0
Carnine, D. (1997). Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disablities, 30(2), 130-141.
Carnine, D. W., Dixon, R. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (1994). Math curriculum guidelines for diverse learners. Curriculum/Technology Qarterly, 3(3), 1-3.
Carnine, D., Jitendra, A., & Silbert, J. (1997). A descriptive analysis of mathematics curricular materials from a pedagogical perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 18(2), 66-81.
Charlesworth, R., & Lind, K. K. (2010). Math and science for young children (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
Cressey, J., & Ezbicki, K. (2008). Improving automaticity with basic addition facts: Do taped problems work faster than cover, copy, compare? Paper 12 presented NERA Annunal Conference. Connecticut, USA. Retrived from https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.tr/&httpsredir=1 &article=1003&context=nera_2008
Freeman, T. J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1984). Effects of a taped-words treatment procedure on learning disabled students' sight-word oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7(1), 49-54.
Gagne, R. M. (1982). Some issues in psychology of mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 7-18.
Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539-1552. doi:10.1037/a0025510
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293-304. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380040301
Gurganus, S. P. (2017). Math instruction for learning problems (2nd ed.). Newyork: Routledge.
Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Developing automaticity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 19(3), 30-33.
Hinton, V., Strozier, S. D., & Flores, M. M. (2014). Building mathematical fluency for students with disabilities or students at-risk for mathematics failure. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 257-265.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 281-288.
Kame’enui, E. J., Carnine, D. W., Dixon, R. C., Simmons, D. C., & Coyne, M. D. (2002). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
McCallum, E. (2006). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing multiplication fact fluency using a low-tech time delay intervention (Doctoral dissertation). Retrived from https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article =3251&context=utk_graddiss
McCallum, E., & Schmitt, A. J. (2011). The taped problems intervention: Increasing the math fact fluency of a student with an intellectual disability. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 276-284.
McCallum, E., Schmitt, A. J., Schneider, D. L., Rezzetano, K., & Skinner, C. H. (2010). Extending research on the taped-problems intervention: Do group rewards enhance math fact fluency development? School Psychology Forum, 4(1), 44-61. doi: 10.1080/15377900903175861
McCallum, E., Skinner, C. H., & Hutchins, H. (2004). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing division fact fluency using a low-tech self-managed time-delay intervention. Joumal of Applied School Psychology, 20(2), 129-147. doi: 10.1300/J370v20n02_08
McCallum, E., Skinner, C. H., Turner, H., & Seacker, L. (2006). The taped-problem intervention: Increasing multiplication fact fluency using low-tech classwide, time delay intervention. School Psychology Review, 35(3), 419-434.
Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19-35.
Miller, K. C., Skinner, C. H., Gibby, L., Galyon, C. E., & Meadows-Allen, S. (2011). Evaluating generalization of addition-fact fluency using the taped-problems procedure in a second-grade classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(3), 203-220. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9126-9
Mong, M. D., & Mong, K. W. (2010). Efficacy of two mathematics interventions for enhancing fluency with elementary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(4), 273-288. doi: 10.1007/s10864-011-9143-8
Mong, M.D., & Mong, K.W. (2012). The utility of brief experimental analysis and extended intervention analysis in selecting effective mathematics interventions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(2), 99-118. doi: 10.1007/s10864-011-9143-8
Özyürek, M. (2009). Bilişsel ve devimsel davranışları öğretmeyi kazandırma [Teaching cognitive and kinesthetic behaviors]. İstanbul: Daktylos Yayıncılık.
Poncy, B. C., Jaspers, K. E., Hansmann, P. R., Bui, L., & Matthew, W. B. (2015). A comparison of taped-problem interventions to increase math fact fluency: Does the length of time delay affect student learning rates? Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(1), 63-82. doi: 10.1080/15377903.2014.963273
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Jaspers, K. E. (2007). Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s10864-006-9025-7
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & McCallum, E. (2012). A comparison of class-wide taped problems and cover, copy, and compare for enhancing mathematics fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 49(8), 744-755. doi:10.1002/pits.21631
Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic skills problems, direct assessment and intervention (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press
Skinner, C. H., Pappas, D., & Davis, K. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 389-403. doi: 10.1002/pits.20065
Skinner, C. H., & Smith, E. S. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-managed interventions for increasing academic performance. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 202-210.
Snell, M. E., & Brown, F. (2014). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson. Stein, M., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (2006). Desining effective mathematics instruction a direct instruction approach (3th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Tekin-İftar, E., & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2016). Özel eğitimde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri [Responce prompting methods in special education] (3. baskı) [3rd ed.]. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
Uysal, H. (2017). Zihin yetersizliği olan öğrencilere temel toplama işlemlerinde akıcılık kazandırmada iki farklı uygulamanın karşılaştırılması [The comparison of two treatments for enhancing basic addition facts fluency of students with intellectuel disabilities] (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir [Anadolu University Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey].
Windingstad, S., Skinner, C. H., Rowland, E., Cardin, E., & Fearrington, J. Y. (2009). Extending research on a math fluency building intervention: Applying taped problems in a second-grade classroom. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25(4), 364-381. doi: 10.1080/15377900903175861
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. New York: Longman Publishing Group
Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Diasbility Quarterly, 29(4), 269-289. doi: org/10.2307/30035554
Yıkmış, A., & Kot, M. (2017). Bölme işlemleri [Division facts]. O. Gürsel (Ed.), Özel gereksinimli öğrencilere matematik beceri ve kavramlarının öğretimin planlama ve uygulama içinde (ss. 343-366) [Planning and application of mathematical skills and concepts to students with special needs]. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.